JayTee wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:53 pm
James,
I have both the Hotech and the AstroTech field flatteners. I prefer the AstroTech. It gives me a better flatter field than does the Hotech.
Cheers,
JT
Jt, I totally believe you, but here is why I am bummed... It took me a very long time to get the spacing just right with the HoTech to have almost a completely flat field, and it was consistent! I have never had such pinpoint stars to the edges!
And now I have to do it all over again with a new field flattener... so either it will perform the way it is supposed to unlike the HoTech and
ES (meaning I don't need the extra 30mm of spacing to achieve 85mm back focus, far above the 55mm), or I will need the same spacing as the
ES and HoTech (85mm, don't know why), but I will have to fine tune like I did with my HoTech to get as close as possible... In other words, I will have to spend a night or two fiddling around with it. To make things worse, it is going to be cloudy all the way until the next new moon, so I will have to waste a
clear night or two on my least favorite part of this hobby--getting a flat field. lol I thought I was done with this T.T
Look how flat this field is:
Also, the HoTech let me unscrew the front end, so I just had the glass piece that allowed me to screw in to the blue fireball 360 degree manual rotator, which was perfect.
But I wanted to try the AstroTech anyway, so I'm not really that bummed
-James W.
Telescope: Explore Scientific 80mm FCD100 Triplet APO Refractor
Mount: EQ6-R Pro
Cameras: ZWO ASI1600mm Pro (Cooled) |
Canon DSLR EOS T7i
Auto-guiding: ZWO ASI120mm-Mini +
Astromania 50mm Guidescope
Filters: ZWO 31mm Ha/Oiii/Sii 7nm + LRGB | Orion 2" Skyglow Filter
Accessories: Explore Scientific 2" Field Flattener, ZWO EFW 8 Position
Software: APT, SharpCap Pro, PHD2, CPWI | PixInsight, DeepSkyStacker, Photoshop
Flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/186194203@N06/18B629