This article does not fully tell the story that the work challenges the EHT image as being an artifact!
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3 ... 357/ac6ddb
We report the result of our independent image reconstruction of the M87 from the public data of the Event Horizon Telescope Collaborators (EHTC). Our result is different from the image published by the EHTC. Our analysis shows that (a) the structure at 230 GHz is consistent with those of lower-frequency very long baseline interferometry observations, (b) the jet structure is evident at 230 GHz extending from the core to a few milliarcsecond, although the intensity rapidly decreases along the axis, and (c) the "unresolved core" is resolved into three bright features presumably showing an initial jet with a wide opening angle of ∼70°. The ring-like structures of the EHTC can be created not only from the public data but also from the simulated data of a point image. Also, the rings are very sensitive to the field-of-view (FOV) size. The u−v coverage of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) lacks ∼ 40 μas fringe spacings. Combining with a very narrow FOV, it created the ∼40 μas ring structure. We conclude that the absence of the jet and the presence of the ring in the EHTC result are both artifacts owing to the narrow FOV setting and the u−v data sampling bias effect of the EHT array. Because the EHTC's simulations only take into account the reproduction of the input image models, and not those of the input noise models, their optimal parameters can enhance the effects of sampling bias and produce artifacts such as the ∼40 μas ring structure, rather than reproducing the correct image.
