Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:49 am
- 4
- Location: Bangalore
- Status:
Offline
Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
I just got our Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ, We set up the entire telescope but are not being able to view anything. Also I have gone through ytube videos and everything written cant seem to figure it out. Also a couple of lenses are not fixed and popping off is this normal ?
can anyone please help? we can do a video call as well. Thx
- JayTee
- Articles: 2
- Posts: 5651
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:23 am
- 5
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
∞ AP Scopes: #1: TPO 6" f/9 RC #2: ES 102 f/7 APO #3: ES 80mm f/6 APO
∞ G&G Scopes: #1: Meade 102mm f/7.8 #2: Bresser 102mm f/4.5
∞ Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs -- The El Cheapo Bros.
∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM70AG, SW EQ6R, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000
∞ Cameras: #1: ZWO ASI294MC Pro #2: 662MC #3: 120MC, Canon T3i, Orion SSAG, WYZE Cam3
∞ Binos: 10X50,11X70,15X70, 25X100 ∞ AP Gear: ZWO EAF and mini EFW and the Optolong L-eXteme filter
∞ EPs: ES 2": 21mm 100° & 30mm 82° Pentax XW: 7, 10, 14, & 20mm 70°
Searching the skies since 1966. "I never met a scope I didn't want to keep."
- Lady Fraktor
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
- 5
- Location: Slovakia
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Your telescope uses a primary mirror at the bottom and a smaller secondary near the top that redirects the image to the focuser.
The eyepiece sits in the focuser and should be held in place by a set screw on the side of the focuser drawtube.
One other thing, set the 4mm and 3x barlow aside as they are much to powerful for this telescope and you will have a very hard time finding anything let alone seeing anything with them.
See Far Sticks: Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser 127/1200 BV, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS 100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, SXP2, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II, Stellarvue M2C, Argo Navis encoders on both
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Tak prism, TAL, Vixen
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss (1000101)
The only culture I have is from yogurt
- Sky Tinker
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:16 am
- 4
- Location: Mid-South, U.S.
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Hello, and welcome!bernard1981 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:51 am Hi All,
I just got our Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ, We set up the entire telescope but are not being able to view anything. Also I have gone through ytube videos and everything written cant seem to figure it out. Also a couple of lenses are not fixed and popping off is this normal ?
can anyone please help? we can do a video call as well. Thx
I have the same telescope, a 114mm
It's a Meade, but it's the same as your Celestron. Both are made in China, perhaps at the same factory even. This is what it looks like on the inside...
There's the focusser, at the top on the right. Is that where you're having a problem? If not, is it the eyepiece or eyepieces themselves? I have a Celestron "PowerSeeker" 127EQ, and it came with same eyepieces and barlow that your kit came with...
Are you having a problem with one of those? If so, which one?
"Desserts tend to corrupt, and absolutely delicious desserts corrupt absolutely." - Chef Acton
Alan
Apochromat: Takahashi FS-102 4" f/8 - Achromats: Meade S102 102mm f/5.9, Antares 805 80mm f/6(flocked & blackened), Meade "Polaris" 70mm f/12.9, Sears(Towa) #4-6340 50mm f/12(flocked & blackened) - Newtonians: Orion 6" f/5(flocked & blackened) - Catadioptrics: Explore Scientific 127mm f/15 Maksutov-Cassegrain, Celestron "PowerSeeker" 127mm f/8 "Bird Jones" reflector(modified, flocked, blackened, and collimated!) - Mounts: Meade LX70(EQ-5), Astro-Tech Voyager I alt-azimuth
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:49 am
- 4
- Location: Bangalore
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
The problem I see is with 3x Barlow Lens - the 2 lenses inside it are so loose that they keep collapsing inside the case.
However, after a few hours of trial n error, my wife was able to setup the telescope for use & it works fine directly with the eyepiece
But yes, we are still wondering if its normal to have these 2 lenses so loosely fit inside the barlow? Thoughts?
- JayTee
- Articles: 2
- Posts: 5651
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:23 am
- 5
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
The 20mm and 4mm eyepieces (EPs) that came with your scope should be good enough to use for the next few months. You really don't need that barlow because it completely overpowers your scope especially with the 4mm
Cheers,
JT
∞ AP Scopes: #1: TPO 6" f/9 RC #2: ES 102 f/7 APO #3: ES 80mm f/6 APO
∞ G&G Scopes: #1: Meade 102mm f/7.8 #2: Bresser 102mm f/4.5
∞ Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs -- The El Cheapo Bros.
∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM70AG, SW EQ6R, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000
∞ Cameras: #1: ZWO ASI294MC Pro #2: 662MC #3: 120MC, Canon T3i, Orion SSAG, WYZE Cam3
∞ Binos: 10X50,11X70,15X70, 25X100 ∞ AP Gear: ZWO EAF and mini EFW and the Optolong L-eXteme filter
∞ EPs: ES 2": 21mm 100° & 30mm 82° Pentax XW: 7, 10, 14, & 20mm 70°
Searching the skies since 1966. "I never met a scope I didn't want to keep."
- mikemarotta
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:37 pm
- 4
- Location: Austin, Texas, USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
You got some good advice so far. I have the 130EQ. One thing I will say for Celestron is that they have great customer service. Reach out to them about the Barlow lens problem.
I agree that the 20mm will be your best lens.You are looking at 50X which is plenty for most of the things you want to see and probably too much to get the whole Moon in view. Right now, the Moon is going to be too bright to look at. And the full moon will get in the way of a lot of sky. However, you should be able to find the Pleiades and the Orion Nebula easily enough and they will be rewarding.
Welcome to a fascinating life-long hobby.
Michael E. Marotta
Astro-Tech 115 mm APO Refractor Explore Scientific 102 mm f/6.47 Refractor Explore Scientific 102 mm f/9.8 Refractor Bresser 8-inch Newtonian Reflector Plössls from 40 to 6 mm Nagler Series-1 7mm. nonMeade 14 mm. Mounts: Celestron AVX, Explore Twilight I Alt-Az, Explore EXOS German Equatorial
- Lady Fraktor
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
- 5
- Location: Slovakia
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Get used to finding and locating objects using it as you will be able to find targets easier and keep them in view.
When you increase the magnification by using the higher power eyepiece you are also looking through a much smaller field of view (
As I said in my other posting, just set the 4mm and barlow aside for now until you get used to using the equipment.
See Far Sticks: Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser 127/1200 BV, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS 100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, SXP2, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II, Stellarvue M2C, Argo Navis encoders on both
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Tak prism, TAL, Vixen
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss (1000101)
The only culture I have is from yogurt
- Sky Tinker
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:16 am
- 4
- Location: Mid-South, U.S.
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
That barlow that comes with the kit is not very good. I have another one that came with my Meade, and it imparted false-colour to the view. Newtonians are not supposed to exhibit false-colour. That's why Newton developed the design, and to get away from the refractors of his age. At most, with that telescope, a 2x-barlow would be enough.bernard1981 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 11:03 am Thank you for your reply.
The problem I see is with 3x Barlow Lens - the 2 lenses inside it are so loose that they keep collapsing inside the case.
However, after a few hours of trial n error, my wife was able to setup the telescope for use & it works fine directly with the eyepiece
But yes, we are still wondering if its normal to have these 2 lenses so loosely fit inside the barlow? Thoughts?
You've got a good telescope, the spherical primary-mirror at 1/5th-wave, but the eyepieces and accessories are not so much, save the 4mm if you that one. I've tested the ones that have come with my Celestron and Meade kits, and the only decent one is the 4mm that came with the Celestron, but that one would not be used that often. If you have that Celestron 4mm, keep it in a safe place, as it will work very well with your telescope when needed. The 20mm erect-image eyepiece, if you have that one, is not very good for observing at night. It was designed and is best suited for use during the day; birds in trees, ships at sea, that sort of thing.
http://www.tejraj.com/
I would suggest the 32mm and 12mm from that listing, along with the "
http://www.tejraj.com/barlow-lenses.html
There is also the "2X BARLOW LENS Skywatcher1.25" from that listing to consider. You won't ever need a 3x-barlow for that particular telescope, as it already has a long focal-length(900mm).
It's important to note that that
A barlow is good for a number of things. One of those is in transforming two or three eyepieces into four or six powers, magnifications; for economy.
I don't barlow any eyepiece longer than a 12mm(20mm, 32mm, 40mm), myself. To me, a barlow is for achieving the higher powers. A barlow is good for that, too.
These are wide-angle eyepieces that would work very well with your telescope, but only those with 1.25" barrels...
http://www.tejraj.com/
I would suggest the
"Desserts tend to corrupt, and absolutely delicious desserts corrupt absolutely." - Chef Acton
Alan
Apochromat: Takahashi FS-102 4" f/8 - Achromats: Meade S102 102mm f/5.9, Antares 805 80mm f/6(flocked & blackened), Meade "Polaris" 70mm f/12.9, Sears(Towa) #4-6340 50mm f/12(flocked & blackened) - Newtonians: Orion 6" f/5(flocked & blackened) - Catadioptrics: Explore Scientific 127mm f/15 Maksutov-Cassegrain, Celestron "PowerSeeker" 127mm f/8 "Bird Jones" reflector(modified, flocked, blackened, and collimated!) - Mounts: Meade LX70(EQ-5), Astro-Tech Voyager I alt-azimuth
- Sky Tinker
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:16 am
- 4
- Location: Mid-South, U.S.
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
It has a very small eye-lens through which to observe. Also, the eye-relief is very tight, and to where you'd need to place your eye to where it almost touches the eyepiece, and touches it even, in order to see the full field-of-view.
Instead, I combine this 12mm eyepiece with a 3x-barlow...
12mm ÷ 3x = a simulated 4mm eyepiece (225x)
I then have a larger eye-lens through which to observe, and I don't have to hold my eye so close to the eyepiece, as the eye-relief is extended, lengthened, with that combination; much more comfortable it is.
In so far as Plossls, try to resist choosing anything shorter than a 9mm(100x), like a 4mm or a 6mm, as those have small eye-lenses and short eye-relief as well.
"Desserts tend to corrupt, and absolutely delicious desserts corrupt absolutely." - Chef Acton
Alan
Apochromat: Takahashi FS-102 4" f/8 - Achromats: Meade S102 102mm f/5.9, Antares 805 80mm f/6(flocked & blackened), Meade "Polaris" 70mm f/12.9, Sears(Towa) #4-6340 50mm f/12(flocked & blackened) - Newtonians: Orion 6" f/5(flocked & blackened) - Catadioptrics: Explore Scientific 127mm f/15 Maksutov-Cassegrain, Celestron "PowerSeeker" 127mm f/8 "Bird Jones" reflector(modified, flocked, blackened, and collimated!) - Mounts: Meade LX70(EQ-5), Astro-Tech Voyager I alt-azimuth
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:49 am
- 4
- Location: Bangalore
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
So, yes, looks like the retaining ring of my Barlow has some issue as the multiple lenses inside it are so loosely fit that they keep falling off
Naturally, I'm away from it ... and we've notified the seller about it. Awaiting to hear from them.
Meanwhile, as recommended by most of you, I am trying to use only the 4mm eyepiece with the 20mm lens ( [mention]JayTee[/mention] )
I then aligned the crosshairs on the finder on Moon today, but the exact view is not really found when I look through eyepeice.
So, I removed the eyepiece to look through aligned the moon position manually and then fixed the eyepeice ... that's when I was able to spot the moon, but only as a huge blob of white ... though the edges of moon were visible... as dots.
probably focus issue?
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:50 pm
- 5
- Location: Leelanau County, Michigan, USA
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
To determine the magnification of the scope with a given eyepiece, divide the focal length of the scope by the focal length of the
However, 225x is too much magnification for your scope. Theoretically, your scope is capable of that, but only under perfect viewing conditions, and those are rare. A realistic USEFUL maximum magnification with that scope is going to be around 110x. That's why people are telling you to set the 4mm
You will want to choose some different eyepieces. You may want to get a 32mm Plossl for low-power, wide-field views at 28x. I regularly use a 17.3mm
But for the planets especially, you WILL want more magnification. When choosing eyepieces, a good rule of thumb is not to use an
I need to say one other thing here. You said "I am trying to use only the 4mm
Here are my suggestions for getting started. Go out in the daytime and point your scope toward a prominent distant object, like a cell tower. Use your 20 mm
Mounts: Vixen SXW/Starbook (original); Stellarvue M2C alt-az.
Eyepieces: Televue: 55mm Plossl, 22mm Panoptic, 17.3mm Delos, 13mm Nagler, c. 1980, 11mm Plossl, 7mm Nagler, 5mm Radian; Meade 15mm Super Plossl; VERNONSCOPE 2.4X BARLOW
Binoculars: Leica 8x32 Trinovids, circa 1997; Orion Megaview 20x80, Orion Paragon Plus mount.
- JayTee
- Articles: 2
- Posts: 5651
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:23 am
- 5
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Put the 4mm eyepiece in a drawer. Do not take it out until you have a telescope with a much shorter focal length.
Cheers,
JT
∞ AP Scopes: #1: TPO 6" f/9 RC #2: ES 102 f/7 APO #3: ES 80mm f/6 APO
∞ G&G Scopes: #1: Meade 102mm f/7.8 #2: Bresser 102mm f/4.5
∞ Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs -- The El Cheapo Bros.
∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM70AG, SW EQ6R, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000
∞ Cameras: #1: ZWO ASI294MC Pro #2: 662MC #3: 120MC, Canon T3i, Orion SSAG, WYZE Cam3
∞ Binos: 10X50,11X70,15X70, 25X100 ∞ AP Gear: ZWO EAF and mini EFW and the Optolong L-eXteme filter
∞ EPs: ES 2": 21mm 100° & 30mm 82° Pentax XW: 7, 10, 14, & 20mm 70°
Searching the skies since 1966. "I never met a scope I didn't want to keep."
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:50 pm
- 5
- Location: Leelanau County, Michigan, USA
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Yep. Can it be that we are sometimes hesitant to make strong, unequivocal statements like that because we are somehow afraid that someone will come along to contradict us with a report on how they made a DIY scope out of an old bathroom hand mirror and a cardboard tube, and used a cheap 4 mm .965
Mounts: Vixen SXW/Starbook (original); Stellarvue M2C alt-az.
Eyepieces: Televue: 55mm Plossl, 22mm Panoptic, 17.3mm Delos, 13mm Nagler, c. 1980, 11mm Plossl, 7mm Nagler, 5mm Radian; Meade 15mm Super Plossl; VERNONSCOPE 2.4X BARLOW
Binoculars: Leica 8x32 Trinovids, circa 1997; Orion Megaview 20x80, Orion Paragon Plus mount.
- JayTee
- Articles: 2
- Posts: 5651
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:23 am
- 5
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Hi Mary,Voyageur wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:11 pmYep. Can it be that we are sometimes hesitant to make strong, unequivocal statements like that because we are somehow afraid that someone will come along to contradict us with a report on how they made a DIY scope out of an old bathroom hand mirror and a cardboard tube, and used a cheap 4 mm .965 EP in it and saw good details on Mars at 450x? Maybe that's just me...
Most of the experienced posters (and there are quite a few) on this site know that in a lot of cases there really is a right way and a wrong way to accomplish a stated goal. My 54 years of observing experiences have taught me many more "wrong" ways than right. Let's let our experience count for something. Actually that's what they pay us for, right...
So if somebody wants to deviate 3 standard deviations away from the norm - I say go for it and let us know how it turned out.
Cheers,
JT
∞ AP Scopes: #1: TPO 6" f/9 RC #2: ES 102 f/7 APO #3: ES 80mm f/6 APO
∞ G&G Scopes: #1: Meade 102mm f/7.8 #2: Bresser 102mm f/4.5
∞ Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs -- The El Cheapo Bros.
∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM70AG, SW EQ6R, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000
∞ Cameras: #1: ZWO ASI294MC Pro #2: 662MC #3: 120MC, Canon T3i, Orion SSAG, WYZE Cam3
∞ Binos: 10X50,11X70,15X70, 25X100 ∞ AP Gear: ZWO EAF and mini EFW and the Optolong L-eXteme filter
∞ EPs: ES 2": 21mm 100° & 30mm 82° Pentax XW: 7, 10, 14, & 20mm 70°
Searching the skies since 1966. "I never met a scope I didn't want to keep."
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:50 pm
- 5
- Location: Leelanau County, Michigan, USA
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Thanks, JT. I know I've learned so much from paying attention to experienced people like you on this forum. There is no substitute for developing experience oneself, but the next best thing is to pay attention to experienced people, especially the highly-paid moderators here .JayTee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:22 pmHi Mary,Voyageur wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:11 pmYep. Can it be that we are sometimes hesitant to make strong, unequivocal statements like that because we are somehow afraid that someone will come along to contradict us with a report on how they made a DIY scope out of an old bathroom hand mirror and a cardboard tube, and used a cheap 4 mm .965 EP in it and saw good details on Mars at 450x? Maybe that's just me...
Most of the experienced posters (and there are quite a few) on this site know that in a lot of cases there really is a right way and a wrong way to accomplish a stated goal. My 54 years of observing experiences have taught me many more "wrong" ways than right. Let's let our experience count for something. Actually that's what they pay us for, right...
So if somebody wants to deviate 3 standard deviations away from the norm - I say go for it and let us know how it turned out.
Cheers,
JT
Mounts: Vixen SXW/Starbook (original); Stellarvue M2C alt-az.
Eyepieces: Televue: 55mm Plossl, 22mm Panoptic, 17.3mm Delos, 13mm Nagler, c. 1980, 11mm Plossl, 7mm Nagler, 5mm Radian; Meade 15mm Super Plossl; VERNONSCOPE 2.4X BARLOW
Binoculars: Leica 8x32 Trinovids, circa 1997; Orion Megaview 20x80, Orion Paragon Plus mount.
- Sky Tinker
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 4:16 am
- 4
- Location: Mid-South, U.S.
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
bernard1981 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 3:36 pm Thank you everyone for your detailed replies.. Truly appreciate it!
So, yes, looks like the retaining ring of my Barlow has some issue as the multiple lenses inside it are so loosely fit that they keep falling off
Naturally, I'm away from it ... and we've notified the seller about it. Awaiting to hear from them.
Meanwhile, as recommended by most of you, I am trying to use only the 4mm eyepiece with the 20mm lens ( @JayTee )
I then aligned the crosshairs on the finder on Moon today, but the exact view is not really found when I look through eyepeice.
So, I removed the eyepiece to look through aligned the moon position manually and then fixed the eyepeice ... that's when I was able to spot the moon, but only as a huge blob of white ... though the edges of moon were visible... as dots.
probably focus issue?
The 4mm that came with your kit, and my own, performed wonderfully with my Celestron 127EQ, a "Bird Jones" no less, and with a longer focal-length(1000mm @ 250x) than that of your own telescope(900mm @ 225x)...
That's just a little snapshot I took through the 4mm using that telescope...
The live view, with my right eye, was sharper, of course, therefore no need to wait to use it with a telescope with a shorter focal-length.
You'll need to shim the holder of the finder-scope to make it easier to align...
You can use masking-type tape even, about 1/2" wide. You want the little scope to fit snugly, not too tightly, nor loosely. You will then find it much easier to adjust with the three screws at the back of the holder, and align it much more easily with the telescope.
Even that 20mm erecting-eyepiece should be throwing up a sharp view of the Moon, but only if the telescope is collimated. I suspect that that may be your problem, although that's unusual for an
Collimation tutorials for a Newtonian abound online; for example...
https://garyseronik.com/a-beginners-gui ... llimation/
It helps to center-spot the primary-mirror beforehand... https://garyseronik.com/centre-dotting- ... ry-mirror/
Then, there's the no-tools and no-spot procedure...
https://garyseronik.com/no-tools-telescope-collimation/
"Desserts tend to corrupt, and absolutely delicious desserts corrupt absolutely." - Chef Acton
Alan
Apochromat: Takahashi FS-102 4" f/8 - Achromats: Meade S102 102mm f/5.9, Antares 805 80mm f/6(flocked & blackened), Meade "Polaris" 70mm f/12.9, Sears(Towa) #4-6340 50mm f/12(flocked & blackened) - Newtonians: Orion 6" f/5(flocked & blackened) - Catadioptrics: Explore Scientific 127mm f/15 Maksutov-Cassegrain, Celestron "PowerSeeker" 127mm f/8 "Bird Jones" reflector(modified, flocked, blackened, and collimated!) - Mounts: Meade LX70(EQ-5), Astro-Tech Voyager I alt-azimuth
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:49 am
- 4
- Location: Bangalore
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Update: Just using my 4mm eyepiece, I was finally able to spot Moon in its full glory! it was so majestic!
But the only problem now is the telescope assembly isn't too sturdy. I still need to figure out how to keep it steady.
Should figure that soon!
I've contacted the seller for replacing the barlow, he too suspects its faulty.
Let's see how that goes.
- Lady Fraktor
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
- 5
- Location: Slovakia
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
This is such a great statement, and happens all to frequently on some sites.Voyageur wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:11 pm Yep. Can it be that we are sometimes hesitant to make strong, unequivocal statements like that because we are somehow afraid that someone will come along to contradict us with a report on how they made a DIY scope out of an old bathroom hand mirror and a cardboard tube, and used a cheap 4 mm .965 EP in it and saw good details on Mars at 450x? Maybe that's just me...
See Far Sticks: Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser 127/1200 BV, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS 100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, SXP2, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II, Stellarvue M2C, Argo Navis encoders on both
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Tak prism, TAL, Vixen
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss (1000101)
The only culture I have is from yogurt
- Lady Fraktor
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
- 5
- Location: Slovakia
- Status:
Offline
Re: Need Help Please... Celestron Powerseeker 114EQ
Get them to replace it with a 2x barlow as the 3x is way to much power for this telescope if you feel you need one.bernard1981 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:48 pm Thank you
Update: Just using my 4mm eyepiece, I was finally able to spot Moon in its full glory! it was so majestic!
But the only problem now is the telescope assembly isn't too sturdy. I still need to figure out how to keep it steady.
Should figure that soon!
I've contacted the seller for replacing the barlow, he too suspects its faulty.
Let's see how that goes.
See Far Sticks: Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser 127/1200 BV, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS 100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, SXP2, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II, Stellarvue M2C, Argo Navis encoders on both
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Tak prism, TAL, Vixen
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss (1000101)
The only culture I have is from yogurt
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute