Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
Don Pensack wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 3:39 pm
Zooms can be sharp, but they have very narrow fields of view in general.
The Leica Aspherical and the APM Super Zoom are two exceptions.
The Svbony 3-8mm Zoom also has a wider field than most.
Here is a page of Zoom measurements taken in a lab: https://astro-talks.ru/forum/viewtopic. ... 83#p101290
yellow = exceptional image quality.
Blue = poor image quality
thx Don .
REFRACTORS , . Lunt 80mm MT Ha Doublet Refractor . William Optics ZenithStar 81 Doublet APO f/6.9 .
BINOS REFRACTOR , apm 82mm sd .
BINOS , Celestron 7x50 made in Japan .
Seestar S50 Smart Telescope .
EYEPIECES, 26mm Nagler t5 , 2-zoom Svbony 7-21 ,2 x Baader Hyperion Universal Zoom Mark IV 8-24mm 68° ,2 x 18mm apm flat field , Orion Premium Linear BinoViewer .
FILTERS, Nebustar 2 tele vue .Celestron uhc . Apm solar wedge . contrast booster 2 inches and 2 x 1,25 inche .
MOUNTS , cg-4 ,MANFROTO 028 B and fluide head 608 .
Starbound Adjustable Observing Chair .
Jean-Yves
I am the result of a star that died a very long time ago, I am being warmed up by another today.
Mike Q wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:02 pm
Testing a 60 dollar eyepiece vs a 300 dollar eyepiece... that isn't evej sporting lol
I know, but those were the only ones I had. Life is hard sometimes.
Testing the 8 to 24 Orion would have been a better test, the Baader still would have won, but by a significantly less margin. I have had them side by side. There is no doubt the Baader is superior but i didnt think it was 100 bucks superior.