Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
Nothing better to do on a day off when it's raining... Decided to dig through some old data again.
Captured 09/04/2021
ZWO2600mm
15x120sec, RGB each = 90min.
20x600sec Ha & OIII each = 6hrs,20min
Total Integration time = 7hrs50mins
Explore Scientific ED152 w/1.0x flattener = 1220mm fl.
iOptron CEM70EC mount
Captured with NINA
Processed with PixInsight
Funny thing, when I do this, I always think the new version is better than the old...till I look at the old version again. I try not to look at the old version while I'm re-processing my images.
Here's the old version. Thoughts?
Honestly Greg, I feel bad saying this, but I'm partial to the old one... Though the reprocess is good, to me it just doesn't have the "ooomph" the original does. But that's me, I know nothing about DSOAP, so I'd take it with a grain of salt
Hope your weather clears!!
All the best,
Mark
"The Hankmeister" Celestron 8SE, orange tube Vixen made C80, CG4, AZ-EQ5 and SolarQuest mounts.
Too much Towa glass/mirrors.
Solar:
H/A - PST stage 2 mod with a Baader 90mm ERF on a Celestron XLT 102 (thanks Mike!)
Ca-K - W/O 61mm, Antares 1.6 barlow, Baader 3.8 OD and Ca-K filters with a ZWO ASI174mm.
W/L - C80-HD with Baader 5.0 & 3.8 Solar film, Solar Continuum 7.5nm and UV/IR filters with a Canon EOS 550D. Member of the RASC
@Thefatkitty , I almost feel the same and I ALWAYS appreciate honest critiques. Personally, I like the stars in the new version and the nebula in the original version. To me, that would be great.
Thanks Mark.
It's crazy how different the same exact data can turn out. It just shows how much of what we do as astrophotographers is a bit of art.
After seeing the two side-by-side, I seriously considered that. I might work on that tonight or tomorrow. Nothing but clouds here from the Pacific atmospheric river.
Anyway, it turned out that with the original version, I only had a finished jpg. So rather then attempt to modify it I just reprocessed the entire image again. This time looking at the original and trying to copy the nebula look in the original one but the stars in the new one. This is what I came up with. It's not a perfect match, but much closer than the first new version I posted today.
Nice reprocess Greg. I do think it is an improvement over the original image. I think the main areas of improvement is the color palette and better control of the star field. Nicely done.
Jim Thommes Jim's Astrophotography
David Levy Maksutov Newtonian, Celestron Edge 9.25, FSQ-106N Refractor (on loan), WO ZenithStar 66 APO Refractor, WO Megrez II APO, Sigma 150 mm EOS Lens
Losmandy G11/Gemini, iOptron GEM45, Celestron Advanced VX, iOptron CEM70
ST8300M Camera, Atik 383L, Canon 350D (IR cut modified), ASI1600M, ASI294M, ASI260M
Observatory - Desert Astronomy Association (Shelter Valley, CA)