Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
We all started somewhere! We are a friendly bunch! Most of your questions can be posted here, but if you are interested in Astrophotography please use the new Beginner Astrophotography forum. The response time will be much better.
Hi all,
I am a begginer as well. Im looking to buy a telescope, my budget is €200-300. Interested in planets, nebulas, deepsky objects,astrophotography. I was looking at this telescope, so i would be more then pleased if you tell me your opinion, and suggest models. This is the model ive been looking at, tho open for more suggestions ,Thanks.
Sky-Watcher Explorer-130PDS (OTA) telescope.
Hello Alek, the telescope you asked about is a good one.
The only issue is that you would require a mount for it which would increase the required budget considerably.
Some refractors, eyepieces, mounts and related equipment The only culture I have is from yogurt
It is great to have you here. Looking forward to hearing about your adventures.
Jim
Scopes: Explore Scientific ED102 APO, Sharpstar 61 EDPH II APO, Samyang 135 F2 (still on the Nikon).
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro with Rowan Belt Mod
Stuff: ASI EAF Focus Motor (x2), ZWO OAG, ZWO 30 mm Guide Scope, ASI 220mm min, ASI 120mm mini, Stellarview 0.8 FR/FF, Sharpstar 0.8 FR/FF, Mele Overloock 3C.
Camera/Filters/Software: ASI 533 mc pro, ASI 120mm mini, ASI 220mm mini , IDAS LPS D-1, Optolong L-Enhance, ZWO UV/IR Cut, N.I.N.A., Green Swamp Server, PHD2, Adobe Photoshop CC, Pixinsight.
Dog and best bud: Jack
Sky: Bortle 6-7
My Astrobin: https://www.astrobin.com/users/Juno16/
What about these three:
Celestron telescope N 127/1000 StarSense Explorer LT 127 AZ
BRESSER Solarix AZ 114/500 Carbon Design Telescopic Starter Set
BRESSER Messier AR-90/900 NANO AZ telescope
The telescope you referenced in your first post is the tube only. It needs a mount upon which to connect it so that the optical tube can move around the sky.
Here is a quick read on all the different telescope mounts and will help you decide which mount is best suited for what you want that telescope to do.
AlekN wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 8:15 pm
What about these three:
Celestron telescope N 127/1000 StarSense Explorer LT 127 AZ
BRESSER Solarix AZ 114/500 Carbon Design Telescopic Starter Set
BRESSER Messier AR-90/900 NANO AZ telescope
When you give us model numbers for gear, it would be nice if there was also a link to where you found it so we can do better research for you.
JT ∞ Primary Scopes: #1: Celestron CPC1100 #2: 8" f/7.5 Dob #3: CR150HD f/8 6" frac ∞ AP Scopes: #1: TPO 6" f/9 RC #2: ES 102 f/7 APO #3: ES 80mm f/6 APO ∞ G&G Scopes: #1: Meade 102mm f/7.8 #2: Bresser 102mm f/4.5 ∞ Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs -- The El Cheapo Bros. ∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM70AG, SW EQ6R, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000 ∞ Cameras: #1: ZWO ASI294MC Pro #2: 662MC #3: 120MC, Plus a Canon T3i, an Orion SSAG, and 3 WYZE Cam3 ∞ Binos: 10X50,11X70,15X70, 25X100 ∞ AP Gear: ZWO EAF and mini EFW and the Optolong L-eXteme filter ∞ EPs: ES 2": 21mm 100° & 30mm 82° Pentax XW: 7, 10, 14, & 20mm 70°
Searching the skies since 1966. "I never met a scope I didn't want to keep."
If you are not opposed to using a mount that will need to be set up on a table or other platform, this telescope has good reviews and is a larger aperture at 130mm than the other 3 scopes and at F/5 (650mm focal length) can show you some of the brighter deep sky objects such as star clusters, nebulae, moon and planets. Read the reviews on it and what's included with the telescope to help you decide. https://www.astroshop.de/teleskope/skyw ... ob/p,14966
Bruce
Refractors: Meade AR-5 127mm f/9.3, Meade ST-80 f/5 and Meade 60mm f/12, Jason 60mm f/15 #313, Jason 60mm f/12 #306 S7, Bushnell Sky Chief III 60mm f/15. Reflectors/Catadioptrics: Meade 10" F/4 Schmidt-Newtonian, Galileo 120mm f/8.3 Newtonian, Meade 2045D 4" f/10 SCT, Meade ETX-90EC f/13.8 & Sarblue 60mm f/12.5 Maksutov-Cassegrains. Mounts: Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro & Meade LXD55 Equatorial mounts, ES Twilight II and Meade 2102 ALT/AZ mounts, a modified 10" SkyQuest Dobsonian mount, various 60mm EQ mounts. Misc: Celestron 20x80mm binoculars, Revolution II Imager/accessories, & lots of optical accessories/eyepieces. Projects: 8" f/2.9 and 65mm f/10 reflectors, Dobson-style binocular mirror mount.
Thanks a lot, i dont want to be bothering a lot . Last thing, ill send a link for a last telescope im looking at , just need your opinion. It says it comes with EQ mount, tho also i was reading somewhere that barlow lenses are not good. And one more question, do i need mount for any kind of telescope or? Thabks a lot guys. https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B00CYHSZ90?ref ... uage=en-GB
You are certainly not bothering us with scope questions
I would avoid a Newtonian on an EQ, they put the eyepiece in awkward places. Newts really shine as a Dobson.
Also, entry level EQ's aren't made very well.
The 90mm refractor on the alt-az looks decent, also check out Dobsons, they are also simple alt-AZ.
Clear Skies,
-Jeff
Member; ASTRA-NJ
Orion 80ED
Celestron C5, Celestar 8
Celestron ST80
Celestron 102 f9.9
Vixen Porta Mount ll
Coronado PST
Bunch of Binos
A big box of Plossls
Little box of filters
AlekN wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 10:21 pm
tho also i was reading somewhere that barlow lenses are not good.
And one more question, do i need mount for any kind of telescope or?
Bad info, Good barlows are good, bad barlows are bad like anything else, quality matters. I have many.
Absolutely!!! The mount IS the most important part of any telescope. It stabilizes the inherent wobble, the sky moves and you must keep moving the telescope to keep up, you need smooth motions or motor drive, any old tripod you have lying about will not work. Just imagine holding and viewing thru a pair of binoculars, but up the magnification to 50X from 7X, impossible to see anything.
My choice for visual viewing is a Dobson type telescope, the design is inherently stable and you get more aperture for the price (BTW gathering light is the most important part of a scope). Don't spend the money too quickly, like me and about everybody else in this hobby, you will probably regret your first purchase. Read all the FYI articles you can find, then hopefully make an informed purchase.
Good luck,
Steve
Scopes; Meade 16 LX200, AT80LE, plus bunch just sitting around gathering dust
Cameras; Atik 460ex mono, Zwo ASI1600MC-cool, QHY5L-II color and mono
Hello Alek,
To start with I would not really start with the 102 f/4.5 refractor to start. One that would be better after you get more viewing experience.
Will you be viewing from the garden or a balcony? I would really recommend the following newtonian to start out.
This will allow you to do your stated objectives and show you different objects for a very long time.
Second option is mount only, no telescope included. I would go with option #3.
#1 has larger aperture, but if you take in to account the central obstruction the light gathering power of 130mm reflector is about the same as of 102mm refractor. Since the 130mm reflector is larger and heavier than 102mm refractor you will have less vibrations and more enjoyable observing.
Lady Fraktor wrote: Mon Nov 20, 2023 7:49 pm
Hello Alek,
To start with I would not really start with the 102 f/4.5 refractor to start. One that would be better after you get more viewing experience.
Will you be viewing from the garden or a balcony? I would really recommend the following newtonian to start out.
This will allow you to do your stated objectives and show you different objects for a very long time.
First off welcome to astronomy. If you have clear skies its a great hobby. If you have cloudy skies its a terrible hobby lol.
I am going to come at this from a different direction and say STOP. Don't spend a dime on anything. Find a club somewhere, even if you have to drive a couple hours. This is where the real research starts. Dont buy anything until you can actually put your hands on various scopes looking at different kinds of objects. Then you will be able to narrow down what scope you really need. While we are more then willing to help you spend your money we will basically tell you what we would get if we were starting over based on our experiences in our skies. Not that there is anything wrong with that but really only you can determine the kind of scope you need to fulfill what you want to do and the only way to do that is to get some hands on experience