Yet another flats question...

Discuss how you are able to get those fantastic images!!!
User avatar
Larry 1969 United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:33 am
4
Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Yet another flats question...

#21

Post by Larry 1969 »


Gordon wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:42 pm I've had pretty good results using the "Flats Wizard" in N.I.N.A. You still need to create settings but it really helps dial it in.
I have been using APT's "CCD Flats Aid". I imagine it's similar to NINA. You enter your target ADU and it calculates the exposure time required.

Larry
For visual:
10" Skywatcher collapsible goto dob, various EP's and a Celestron StarSense auto align.

For imaging:
Orion 8" astrograph 800mm @ F3.9
Eq6-R Pro controlled by APT via EQmod with an OTA mounted mini PC
Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 coma corrector
Altair Hypercam 26C
Image
User avatar
SkyHiker United States of America
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 8:40 pm
4
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Yet another flats question...

#22

Post by SkyHiker »


From the aforementioned thread https://groups.io/g/DeepSkyStacker/topi ... 3711653336 , it seems clear that my problem is caused by LP. Larry, this could be the case with yours too because stackers generally can't differentiate between obstruction-related background gradients (flats) and LP, so any LP will introduce flat-originating gradients.
... Henk. :D Telescopes: GSO 12" Astrograph, "Comet Hunter" MN152, ES ED127CF, ES ED80, WO Redcat51, Z12, AT6RC, Celestron Skymaster 20x80, Mounts and tripod: Losmandy G11S with OnStep, AVX, Tiltall, Cameras: ASI2600MC, ASI2600MM, ASI120 mini, Fuji X-a1, Canon XSi, T6, ELPH 100HS, DIY: OnStep controller, Pi4b/power rig, Afocal adapter, Foldable Dob base, Az/Alt Dob setting circles, Accessories: ZWO 36 mm filter wheel, TV Paracorr 2, Baader MPCC Mk III, ES FF, SSAG, QHY OAG-M, EAF electronic focuser, Plossls, Barlows, Telrad, Laser collimators (Seben LK1, Z12, Howie Glatter), Cheshire, 2 Orion RACIs 8x50, Software: KStars-Ekos, DSS, PHD2, Nebulosity, Photo Gallery, Gimp, CHDK, Computers:Pi4b, 2x running KStars/Ekos, Toshiba Satellite 17", Website:Henk's astro images
User avatar
SkyHiker United States of America
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 8:40 pm
4
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Yet another flats question...

#23

Post by SkyHiker »


Larry 1969 wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:28 pm There is a setting in APP under the "Calibrate" tab for master flat integration. "Automatic" is the default. The other choices are "average", "median" and "maximum". According to the help, "automatic" will choose between "average" and "median" depending on the number of flats. Less than 20 it selects "median" and more than 20 gets "average". "Maximum" says Use maximum to show all outliers / artifacts (with too high ADU values) in the data like hot pixels, cosmic rays etc.

I restacked my image using "maximum" and it made no visible difference...

I'll keep fooling around I suppose...

Larry
But those settings only make "micro-level" changes, not the "macro-level" ones that we need to reduce the gradients that we experience, right?
... Henk. :D Telescopes: GSO 12" Astrograph, "Comet Hunter" MN152, ES ED127CF, ES ED80, WO Redcat51, Z12, AT6RC, Celestron Skymaster 20x80, Mounts and tripod: Losmandy G11S with OnStep, AVX, Tiltall, Cameras: ASI2600MC, ASI2600MM, ASI120 mini, Fuji X-a1, Canon XSi, T6, ELPH 100HS, DIY: OnStep controller, Pi4b/power rig, Afocal adapter, Foldable Dob base, Az/Alt Dob setting circles, Accessories: ZWO 36 mm filter wheel, TV Paracorr 2, Baader MPCC Mk III, ES FF, SSAG, QHY OAG-M, EAF electronic focuser, Plossls, Barlows, Telrad, Laser collimators (Seben LK1, Z12, Howie Glatter), Cheshire, 2 Orion RACIs 8x50, Software: KStars-Ekos, DSS, PHD2, Nebulosity, Photo Gallery, Gimp, CHDK, Computers:Pi4b, 2x running KStars/Ekos, Toshiba Satellite 17", Website:Henk's astro images
User avatar
Larry 1969 United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:33 am
4
Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Yet another flats question...

#24

Post by Larry 1969 »


SkyHiker wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 8:50 pm But those settings only make "micro-level" changes, not the "macro-level" ones that we need to reduce the gradients that we experience, right?
I'm sure you're right. Most of this is over my head...

Larry
For visual:
10" Skywatcher collapsible goto dob, various EP's and a Celestron StarSense auto align.

For imaging:
Orion 8" astrograph 800mm @ F3.9
Eq6-R Pro controlled by APT via EQmod with an OTA mounted mini PC
Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 coma corrector
Altair Hypercam 26C
Image
han.k
Earth Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:45 am
3
Location: the Netherlands
Status:
Offline

Re: Yet another flats question...

#25

Post by han.k »


There must be something wrong in the processes.

1) The gain used for the lights, darks, flat and flat-darks must be same.
2) Exposure time and temperature of the lights & darks should be the same
3) Exposure time and temperature of the flats & flat-darks should be the same
4) Flats should be made with the same filter as the lights.
5) Flats should not be overexposed (saturated)



Han
User avatar
Larry 1969 United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:33 am
4
Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Yet another flats question...

#26

Post by Larry 1969 »


han.k wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:42 am There must be something wrong in the processes.

1) The gain used for the lights, darks, flat and flat-darks must be same.
2) Exposure time and temperature of the lights & darks should be the same
3) Exposure time and temperature of the flats & flat-darks should be the same
4) Flats should be made with the same filter as the lights.
5) Flats should not be overexposed (saturated)



Han
Thanks but I think I'm doing it right.
1) Yes. I never adjust the gain.
2) I don't use dark frames anymore but, when I did, the exposure and temp was the same as lights.
3) I shot the flats and flat darks at the end of the imaging session and camera cooler was still on.
4) I don't use any filters.
5) My flats were set to 20,000 ADU which is about 1/3 of my 65,000.

Larry
For visual:
10" Skywatcher collapsible goto dob, various EP's and a Celestron StarSense auto align.

For imaging:
Orion 8" astrograph 800mm @ F3.9
Eq6-R Pro controlled by APT via EQmod with an OTA mounted mini PC
Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 coma corrector
Altair Hypercam 26C
Image
User avatar
Larry 1969 United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:33 am
4
Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Yet another flats question...

#27

Post by Larry 1969 »


UPDATE... PROBLEM SOLVED!!!

It turns out I had some loose adapters and spacers allowing my camera to rotate a bit. I pulled everything apart and put a few drops of blue Loctite on the threads then tightened everything securely. My flats seemed to correct properly last night resulting in an image that required very little cropping.

Thanks for the replies and suggestions!

Larry
For visual:
10" Skywatcher collapsible goto dob, various EP's and a Celestron StarSense auto align.

For imaging:
Orion 8" astrograph 800mm @ F3.9
Eq6-R Pro controlled by APT via EQmod with an OTA mounted mini PC
Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 coma corrector
Altair Hypercam 26C
Image
User avatar
JayTee United States of America
Universal Ambassador
Articles: 2
Online
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:23 am
4
Location: Idaho, USA
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Yet another flats question...

#28

Post by JayTee »


I would not have thought of Loctite as a solution. Thanks for this post.
∞ Primary Scopes: #1: Celestron CPC1100 #2: 8" f/7.5 Dob #3: CR150HD f/8 6" frac
∞ AP Scopes: #1: TPO 6" f/9 RC #2: ES 102 f/7 APO #3: ES 80mm f/6 APO
∞ G&G Scopes: #1: Meade 102mm f/7.8 #2: Bresser 102mm f/4.5
∞ Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs -- The El Cheapo Bros.
∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM70AG, SW EQ6, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000
∞ Cameras: #1: ZWO ASI294MC Pro #2: 662MC #3: 120MC, Canon T3i, Orion SSAG, WYZE Cam3
∞ Binos: 10X50,11X70,15X70, 25X100
∞ EPs: ES 2": 21mm 100° & 30mm 82° Pentax XW: 7, 10, 14, & 20mm 70°

Searching the skies since 1966. "I never met a scope I didn't want to keep."

Image
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Image processing”