102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

Post your comments in regards to recent Articles and Reviews.
User avatar
John Baars Netherlands
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 5
Online
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 9:00 am
4
Location: Schiedam, Netherlands
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#1

Post by John Baars »


102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140
by John Baars

102mm refractor versus 140mm Maksutov Vixen ED102S vs. OMC140 Preface Some years ago I bought an older Japanese Vixen ED 102 f / 9 refractor from the Nineties. Reason: I wanted to get rid of the long cooling time of my OMC Maksutov, but at least retain the image quality of the Maksutov. Preferably with...
Read more...
Refractors in frequency of use : *SW Evostar 120ED F/7.5 (all round ), * Vixen 102ED F/9 (vintage), both on Vixen GPDX.
GrabnGo on Alt/AZ : *SW Startravel 102 F/5 refractor( widefield, Sun, push-to), *OMC140 Maksutov F/14.3 ( planets).
Most used Eyepieces: *Panoptic 24, *Morpheus 14, *Leica ASPH zoom, *Zeiss barlow, *Pentax XO5.
Commonly used bino's : *Jena 10X50 , * Canon 10X30 IS, *Swarovski Habicht 7X42, * Celestron 15X70, *Kasai 2.3X40
Rijswijk Public Observatory: * Astro-Physics Starfire 130 f/8, * 6 inch Newton, * C9.25, * Meade 14 inch LX600 ACF, *Lunt.
Amateur astronomer since 1970.
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#2

Post by notFritzArgelander »


Fine article and well illustrated. The conclusions are about what I would expect based on optical science. Also a nice job demonstrating (among other things) that Maksutovs are good on DSOs.

One point of clarification, although Rutten may have designed this scope, it is not a Rutten-Maksutov Mak if it has a silvered spot secondary on the back of the corrector plate. That is a Gregory-Maksutov. The Rutten-Maksutov has a separately curved secondary which gives an additional degree of freedom for the optical design. Your photo indicates one can see the secondary spot on the corrector, so if I'm interpreting the situation correctly it is a Rutten designed Gregory-Maksutov, likely.
Last edited by notFritzArgelander on Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
Lady Fraktor Slovakia
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 9860
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
4
Location: Slovakia
Status:
Offline

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#3

Post by Lady Fraktor »


A great article John, thank you for putting this together.
See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
The only culture I have is from yogurt
My day was going well until... people
Image
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#4

Post by notFritzArgelander »


notFritzArgelander wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:08 pm Fine article and well illustrated. The conclusions are about what I would expect based on optical science. Also a nice job demonstrating (among other things) that Maksutovs are good on DSOs.

One point of clarification, although Rutten may have designed this scope, it is not a Rutten-Maksutov Mak if it has a silvered spot secondary on the back of the corrector plate. That is a Gregory-Maksutov. The Rutten-Maksutov has a separately curved secondary which gives an additional degree of freedom for the optical design. Your photo indicates one can see the secondary spot on the corrector, so if I'm interpreting the situation correctly it is a Rutten designed Gregory-Maksutov, likely.
It belatedly occurs to me that if the silvered secondary were a meniscus cemented to the back of the corrector then it could be a Rutten designed Rutten Maksutov. Would it be possible to check and see if the reflective coating were on the corrector directly or with and intervening meniscus? Thanks.

PS There is a review on another site that says that while the layout is Gregory-Maksutov, one of the surfaces is aspheric. So I'm curious.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
Bigzmey United States of America
Moderator
Moderator
Articles: 8
Online
Posts: 7548
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:55 pm
4
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#5

Post by Bigzmey »


Thanks for a thorough and well executed review John! Your experience matches mine closely. For me it was 80mm ED vs 127mm Mak. The Mak felt darker than it should on DSOs. Jupiter view was sharper in 80mm, but Mak resolved more details at the moments of better seeing.
Scopes: Stellarvue: SV102ED; Celestron: 9.25" EdgeHD, 8" SCT, 150ST, Onyx 80ED; iOptron: Hankmeister 6" Mak; SW: 7" Mak; Meade: 80ST.
Mounts: SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; iOptron: AZMP; ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; UA: MicroStar.
Binos: APM: 100-90 APO; Canon: IS 15x50; Orion: Binoviewer, LG II 15x70, WV 10x50, Nikon: AE 16x50, 10x50, 8x40.
EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68, 62; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV.
Diagonals: Baader: BBHS mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: 2" prism.
Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S, 6-color set; Astronomik: UHC.

Observing: DSOs: 3106 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 2180, S110: 77). Doubles: 2382, Comets: 34, Asteroids: 255
User avatar
Lady Fraktor Slovakia
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 9860
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
4
Location: Slovakia
Status:
Offline

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#6

Post by Lady Fraktor »


From Orion Optics UK page:
The design is not a standard all spherical one with a main mirror the same size as the corrector. That is the traditional Maksutov design but, it lacks off axis performance and suffers from coma. The OMC140 has an ellipsoidal primary which is over 12mm larger in diameter than the Maksutov corrector. This added aspherisation of the primary allows much wider flatter fields to be achieved but it virtually eliminates coma.

https://www.orionoptics.co.uk/OMC/omc140maksutovca.html
See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
The only culture I have is from yogurt
My day was going well until... people
Image
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#7

Post by notFritzArgelander »


Lady Fraktor wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2020 4:40 am From Orion Optics UK page:
The design is not a standard all spherical one with a main mirror the same size as the corrector. That is the traditional Maksutov design but, it lacks off axis performance and suffers from coma. The OMC140 has an ellipsoidal primary which is over 12mm larger in diameter than the Maksutov corrector. This added aspherisation of the primary allows much wider flatter fields to be achieved but it virtually eliminates coma.

https://www.orionoptics.co.uk/OMC/omc140maksutovca.html
Thanks. I dyslexically missed that. It is then neither Gregory-Maksutov nor Rutten-Maksutov both of which have all spherical surfaces but is rather a unique and proprietary design based on a Gregory-Maksutov layout. Thanks again!
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
John Baars Netherlands
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 5
Online
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 9:00 am
4
Location: Schiedam, Netherlands
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#8

Post by John Baars »


H. Rutten designed the optics as far as I know, including the ellipsoidal primary.
But there is more, he also designed the baffle system, which has some 15 mini-baffles within the main central baffle.
The famous Wolfgang Rohr ( at least he is well known all over Europe) tested an OMC140:
http://r2.astro-foren.com/index.php/de/ ... tografisch
Here one can read the following:
The OMC140 has an ellipsoidal mirror which is over 12mm larger in diameter than the Maksutov corrector. This added aspherisation of the primary allows much wider flatter fields to be achieved, but it virtually eliminates coma.
Furthermore one can see an intersection of the baffle in the link.
Refractors in frequency of use : *SW Evostar 120ED F/7.5 (all round ), * Vixen 102ED F/9 (vintage), both on Vixen GPDX.
GrabnGo on Alt/AZ : *SW Startravel 102 F/5 refractor( widefield, Sun, push-to), *OMC140 Maksutov F/14.3 ( planets).
Most used Eyepieces: *Panoptic 24, *Morpheus 14, *Leica ASPH zoom, *Zeiss barlow, *Pentax XO5.
Commonly used bino's : *Jena 10X50 , * Canon 10X30 IS, *Swarovski Habicht 7X42, * Celestron 15X70, *Kasai 2.3X40
Rijswijk Public Observatory: * Astro-Physics Starfire 130 f/8, * 6 inch Newton, * C9.25, * Meade 14 inch LX600 ACF, *Lunt.
Amateur astronomer since 1970.
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#9

Post by notFritzArgelander »


John Baars wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:12 am H. Rutten designed the optics as far as I know, including the ellipsoidal primary.
But there is more, he also designed the baffle system, which has some 15 mini-baffles within the main central baffle.
The famous Wolfgang Rohr ( at least he is well known all over Europe) tested an OMC140:
http://r2.astro-foren.com/index.php/de/ ... tografisch
Here one can read the following:
The OMC140 has an ellipsoidal mirror which is over 12mm larger in diameter than the Maksutov corrector. This added aspherisation of the primary allows much wider flatter fields to be achieved, but it virtually eliminates coma.
Furthermore one can see an intersection of the baffle in the link.
Fine, well, and very good. Not arguing that Rutten didn't design the OMC140. I'm simply clarifying that the OMC140 is not a Rutten-Maksutov. One can see from the linked diagrams that the OMC140 is laid out as a Gregory-Maksutov. It doesn't have a secondary separate from the corrector as the diagram in your link shows. The separate secondary design as in Lourdes linked diagram (originally from Rutten's book) is what makes a Rutten-Maksutov what it is.

Rutten's idea of an aspheric ellipse ideal oversize primary is quite ingenious and it is very nicely baffled indeed. Rohr's test data are quite impressive. I compared them with the theoretical data in Rutten's book and it looks excellent.

I'm simply hoping that folks don't confuse this apparently Rutten designed aspheric Gregory-Maksutov system with a Rumak-Maksutov.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
John Baars Netherlands
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 5
Online
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 9:00 am
4
Location: Schiedam, Netherlands
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#10

Post by John Baars »


To notFritzArgelander:
I have changed the text in:
The OMC was designed by H. Rutten as an aspherical Gregory- Maksutov and is internally equipped with a sophisticated baffle system.
Just to be sure. :D
Refractors in frequency of use : *SW Evostar 120ED F/7.5 (all round ), * Vixen 102ED F/9 (vintage), both on Vixen GPDX.
GrabnGo on Alt/AZ : *SW Startravel 102 F/5 refractor( widefield, Sun, push-to), *OMC140 Maksutov F/14.3 ( planets).
Most used Eyepieces: *Panoptic 24, *Morpheus 14, *Leica ASPH zoom, *Zeiss barlow, *Pentax XO5.
Commonly used bino's : *Jena 10X50 , * Canon 10X30 IS, *Swarovski Habicht 7X42, * Celestron 15X70, *Kasai 2.3X40
Rijswijk Public Observatory: * Astro-Physics Starfire 130 f/8, * 6 inch Newton, * C9.25, * Meade 14 inch LX600 ACF, *Lunt.
Amateur astronomer since 1970.
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#11

Post by notFritzArgelander »


John Baars wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2020 6:38 pm To notFritzArgelander:
I have changed the text in:
The OMC was designed by H. Rutten as an aspherical Gregory- Maksutov and is internally equipped with a sophisticated baffle system.
Just to be sure. :D
Well, that's certainly as precise as one can get! :)

I know that some folks have been confused by the advertising and have claimed it as something else. :)
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
Refractordude
Interdicted
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 1:05 am
4
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#12

Post by Refractordude »


A nice review
User avatar
j.gardavsky Germany
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:52 pm
4
Location: Germany
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#13

Post by j.gardavsky »


Hello John,

thank you for the report you have supported with your excellent sketches!

Best,
JG
6" F/5 Sky-Watcher achro, 2" BBHS Star Diagonal, 2" zenith prism, 1.25" Takahashi prism
Leica 82mm APO Televid
Eyepieces: Docter UWA; Leica B WW and WW Asph. Zoom; Leica HC Plan S and L, monocentric; Pentax SMC XW, O-, XO; Tak MC O, Carl Zeiss B WW, and Pl, E-Pl, S-Pl, W-Pl;
Swarovski SW; Baader Symmetric Diascope Edition; Nikon NAV SW, ; TMB supermonocentric; Rodenstock; Vixen HR; TV Delos
Filters: Astrodon, Astronomik, Baader, Balzers, Zeiss West and East, Lumicon
Binoculars (7x42 up to 15x85): Docter Nobilem, Leica Ultravid, Nikon Astroluxe, Swarovski EL Swarovision; BA8 (Kunming Optical)
User avatar
Ylem United States of America
Universal Ambassador
Articles: 0
Online
Posts: 7477
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 2:54 am
4
Location: Ocean County, New Jersey
Status:
Online

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#14

Post by Ylem »


Thanks John, I enjoyed this.
Clear Skies,
-Jeff :telescopewink:


Member; ASTRA-NJ



Orion 80ED
Celestron C5, 6SE, Celestar 8
Vixen Porta Mount ll
Coronado PST
A big box of Plossls
Little box of filters
:D



User avatar
John999R United States of America
Earth Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:08 pm
4
Location: California USA
Status:
Offline

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#15

Post by John999R »


Thank you for the fine review and comparison. The Celestron/Orion refractors made by Vixen years ago were outstanding instruments. My first scope was the base model Orion by Vixen 102. I believe the Orion/Celestron by Vixen 102mm series had three OTAs, my base model achromat that acted like an APO, the ED102 you reviewed, and the legendary 102 Flourite APO. All were doublets. I did compare my scope against the ES 152 and the 102 produced sharper stars. I couldn't get over how good this reasonably priced scope really was and I was not alone as I connected with other 102 owners at the time. I actually wanted to step up and buy the fluoride 102, but I just couldn't see paying what they were asking for them when there were many quality and affordable triplets coming on the market at that time. Your review was a nostalgic reminder of a great line up of refractors by Vixen.
User avatar
John Baars Netherlands
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 5
Online
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 9:00 am
4
Location: Schiedam, Netherlands
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#16

Post by John Baars »


Hello John,
Nice to hear from you. Do you still have your Vixen?

I have been surprised too by the excellent performance of this refractor. And so did the optician (a very well known one in the Dutch astronomy society) who re-coated the frontlens for me. He told me never ever to get rid of it and if I did, I should call him...
I am the third owner, I am glad to hear from a first owner of that Vixen line. When these Vixens came out I was still busy scouring the Universe with ATM Newtons.

When Vixen (and other companies) started making the Fluorite doublet line, Fluorite was still a very scarce and expensive crystal. It became that popular that soon a shortage developed on the economic market. Vixen responded with the f/9 ED doublet refractor, made of less expensive glass. The f/9 was necessary to achieve almost the same CA as the Fluorite one. (CA in this f/9 is only seen at the edges of a defocussed star) Soon after newly made, less expensive extra low dispersion glasses like FPL-53 made it possible to construct f/7.5 ( doublet ) refractors again, without the use of the difficult to handle Fluorite. The triumphant decade of the f/9 ED doublets therefore soon came to an end.

Stil, even today it performs like heaven and it is nice to have a (neo)classical among my telescopes.
Refractors in frequency of use : *SW Evostar 120ED F/7.5 (all round ), * Vixen 102ED F/9 (vintage), both on Vixen GPDX.
GrabnGo on Alt/AZ : *SW Startravel 102 F/5 refractor( widefield, Sun, push-to), *OMC140 Maksutov F/14.3 ( planets).
Most used Eyepieces: *Panoptic 24, *Morpheus 14, *Leica ASPH zoom, *Zeiss barlow, *Pentax XO5.
Commonly used bino's : *Jena 10X50 , * Canon 10X30 IS, *Swarovski Habicht 7X42, * Celestron 15X70, *Kasai 2.3X40
Rijswijk Public Observatory: * Astro-Physics Starfire 130 f/8, * 6 inch Newton, * C9.25, * Meade 14 inch LX600 ACF, *Lunt.
Amateur astronomer since 1970.
User avatar
John999R United States of America
Earth Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:08 pm
4
Location: California USA
Status:
Offline

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#17

Post by John999R »


Sorry, I didn't back to you sooner John, unfortunately, I no longer have the 102. It was another example of me selling something I regretted later, just like a couple of motorcycles I sold in the past. Just one of those life cycles, making room for something else, something bigger. As I mentioned, I managed to network with four or five base model Vixen/Orion OTAs and all of us were on the same page as far as how good this telescope was relative to its price and specs. It was in the pre-China era and most of us know Vixen makes fine doublets anyway. I recall one memorable night looking through the 102 at Mars. What blew me away was the fact the planetary surface contrast was good enough that I could make out the darker shapes of the "continents", the northern polar region was easy to spot, maybe it was the south, I forget. I was using a 6mm eyepiece.

Soon after I sold the Vixen I fell into the rabbit hole of trying to learn astrophotography. A combination of rewards and many frustrations. I'm still plugging away tho. Thanks for the bits of historical information regarding the series. I pay attention when anyone talks about any of the Orion or Celestron Vixen telescopes. I've bought and sold maybe five telescopes since then and none of them raise any interest like the 102 still does.
User avatar
DeanD Australia
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 7:27 am
4
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#18

Post by DeanD »


Hi guys, I am super late on this one; but just a comment on the Vixen 102 f9. I had a Vixen 114ED which was stolen (long story), and I picked up a used 102 f9 as a partial replacement. It blew the 114 and my later Megrez 110 out of the water as a high power/planetary scope. Sadly I sold it along with the Megrez (not sad about that though) to help fund my TSA 102: and it even gave the Tak a run for its money. A lovely, and I think underrated scope!

- Dean
Telescopes: 12" f5 dob, Celestron CPC800, 150mmf5 Celestron achro, Tak TSA102, TV76, ETX125...
Binos: Steiner Wildlife XP 10x26, Swarovski 8x30 Habicht, Zeiss SFL 8x40, Vanguard Endeavour 10.5x45, Fuji FMTR-SX 10x50, Tak 22x60, Orion Resolux 15x70
Eyepieces: way too many (is that possible?), but I do like my TV 32mm plossl, 13mm Nagler T6, 27mm Panoptic and 3-6mm Nagler zoom, plus Fujiyama 18mm and 25mm orthos and Tak 7.5mm LE
User avatar
John Baars Netherlands
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 5
Online
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 9:00 am
4
Location: Schiedam, Netherlands
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#19

Post by John Baars »


Thanks Dean for your comment!
I always wondered where the owners of the Vixen 102 f/9 were. Too busy enjoying their telescope I presume.
Luckily you and John 999R responded. I know it is a good scope, but it is always nice to hear the experience of other owners who are able to compare it to former or current scopes.
DeanD wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2020 11:49 am it even gave the Tak a run for its money.
Haha, great to hear!
Refractors in frequency of use : *SW Evostar 120ED F/7.5 (all round ), * Vixen 102ED F/9 (vintage), both on Vixen GPDX.
GrabnGo on Alt/AZ : *SW Startravel 102 F/5 refractor( widefield, Sun, push-to), *OMC140 Maksutov F/14.3 ( planets).
Most used Eyepieces: *Panoptic 24, *Morpheus 14, *Leica ASPH zoom, *Zeiss barlow, *Pentax XO5.
Commonly used bino's : *Jena 10X50 , * Canon 10X30 IS, *Swarovski Habicht 7X42, * Celestron 15X70, *Kasai 2.3X40
Rijswijk Public Observatory: * Astro-Physics Starfire 130 f/8, * 6 inch Newton, * C9.25, * Meade 14 inch LX600 ACF, *Lunt.
Amateur astronomer since 1970.
User avatar
helicon United States of America
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 584
Online
Posts: 12276
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
4
Location: Washington
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

Re: 102 mm Refractor versus 140 mm Maksutov; Vixen ED102 vs OMC140

#20

Post by helicon »


Very helpful article John. Thanks (though I am a bit late to the party here).
-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Articles and Reviews”