The Photoacoustic Effect

Discuss the latest astronomy news!
Post Reply
User avatar
SparWeb Canada
Jupiter Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 3:16 am
4
Location: Irricana, Alberta, Canada
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

The Photoacoustic Effect

#1

Post by SparWeb »


I'm having trouble believing this.

Apparently, the sound that some people report hearing when they see a meteor flash overhead is not necessarily in their imagination.
The authors of this paper have extracted from the principles of the photoacoustic effect (studied in experiments by Alexander G. Bell in the late 1800's) and done their own models and tests to show that the effect of light flashing from a bright fireball can generate a noise that the observer will hear immediately. It is normally agreed that the sound of impact, ablation, and vaporization is too far away to be heard by the observer of a meteorite. And if possible, there would be a substantial time delay. I myself have seen some very bright fireballs and waited for a possible noise, only to hear nothing. The authors of this paper propose a new source of the noise that the observers can hear immediately as they see the flash. Due to the photoacoustic effect, the observers can hear a noise from a bright meteor generated by their own hair. Let me repeat that... from their hair. And their clothes.

It's published by Nature magazine. I've always considered Nature to be fairly reputable. Well, I think it's reputable...

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep41251
https://www.osti.gov/pages/servlets/purl/1345579

Just circling back to my own observations for a moment. As I said, I have seen some bright fireballs. Two bright enough to be worth reporting, and one of them was surprisingly photographed in Idaho! (I'm in Calgary, so that should give you an idea how bright it was). I did not hear a sound. It was a very quiet night. I do have hair. Not much, mind you... ...and I was wearing clothes at the time... ...so why couldn't I hear the photoacoustic sound?

I'm still very puzzled by this article.
Steven Fahey
51.248N, 113.53W, 995m ASL
Image
https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/IALBERTA147
Canon 6D (unmodified) + Lunt 4" (102mm) achromat refractor (7.1 focal ratio) + Celestron AVX mount
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: The Photoacoustic Effect

#2

Post by notFritzArgelander »


The article seems very well reasoned to me. Whether or not one would hear a sound from a meteor would depend on the detailed physical properties of the hair and clothing of the observer. Some materials would be more efficient as photoacoustic transducers than others.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Astronomy News”