House introduces NASA authorization bill that emphasizes Mars over moon

Discuss current topic regarding space exploration.
Post Reply
User avatar
smp United States of America
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Online
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 10:34 pm
4
Location: NH, USA
Status:
Online

House introduces NASA authorization bill that emphasizes Mars over moon

#1

Post by smp »


From SpaceNews.com:
"WASHINGTON — The leadership of the House Science Committee introduced a NASA authorization bill Jan. 24 that seeks to significantly alter NASA’s current plans to return humans to the moon and make them part of an effort to send humans to Mars."

https://spacenews.com/house-introduces- ... over-moon/

Here we go again. Let's end up with a bunch of competing ideas in Washington, instead of a unified goal the Government can fund and stick to. SIGH!

smp
Stephen
- - - - -
Telescopes: Questar 3.5 Standard SN 18-11421; Stellina (EAA)
Solar: Thousand Oaks white light filter; Daystar Quark (chromosphere) Hα filter
Mounts: Explore Scientific Twilight I; Majestic heavy duty tripod
Local Club: New Hampshire Astronomical Society
User avatar
GCoyote United States of America
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 2709
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 2:53 am
4
Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Status:
Offline

Re: House introduces NASA authorization bill that emphasizes Mars over moon

#2

Post by GCoyote »


Agreed. Neither project that can make any progress when a new crop of Congress-Critters shows up every two years and rearranges the furniture for 40th time.
Any metaphor will tear if stretched over too much reality.
Gary C

Celestron Astro Master 130mm f5 Newtonian GEM
Meade 114-EQ-DH f7.9 Newtonian w/ manual GEM
Bushnell 90mm f13.9 Catadioptric
Gskyer 80mm f5 Alt/Az refractor
Jason 10x50 Binoculars
Celestron 7x50 Binoculars
Svbony 2.1x42 Binoculars
(And a bunch of stuff I'm still trying to fix or find parts for.)
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: House introduces NASA authorization bill that emphasizes Mars over moon

#3

Post by notFritzArgelander »


GCoyote wrote: Tue Jan 28, 2020 1:38 am Agreed. Neither project that can make any progress when a new crop of Congress-Critters shows up every two years and rearranges the furniture for 40th time.
Although NASA program management has not been stellar ( ;) ) IMO Congress and politicians can be counted on to REALLY screw things up.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
smp United States of America
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Online
Posts: 3424
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 10:34 pm
4
Location: NH, USA
Status:
Online

Re: House introduces NASA authorization bill that emphasizes Mars over moon

#4

Post by smp »


Here's a new article from SpaceNews.com:
"Bridenstine concerned about aspects of House NASA authorization bill"

""I am concerned that the bill imposes some significant constraints on our approach to lunar exploration,” Bridenstine said in a statement posted on the NASA website, referring specifically to language in the bill that would make NASA change its approach to developing a human lunar lander.

In particular, we are concerned that the bill’s approach to developing a human lander system as fully government-owned and directed would be ineffective,” he wrote. “The approach established by the bill would inhibit our ability to develop a flexible architecture that takes advantage of the full array of national capabilities — government and private sector — to accomplish national goals.""

https://spacenews.com/bridenstine-conce ... tion-bill/

smp
Stephen
- - - - -
Telescopes: Questar 3.5 Standard SN 18-11421; Stellina (EAA)
Solar: Thousand Oaks white light filter; Daystar Quark (chromosphere) Hα filter
Mounts: Explore Scientific Twilight I; Majestic heavy duty tripod
Local Club: New Hampshire Astronomical Society
User avatar
GCoyote United States of America
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 2709
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 2:53 am
4
Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Status:
Offline

Re: House introduces NASA authorization bill that emphasizes Mars over moon

#5

Post by GCoyote »


He has a point. The greatest advance in global space exploration over the past decade has not been any particular mission or system. It's been the tremendous expansion of competition by and between new commercial space businesses.
Any metaphor will tear if stretched over too much reality.
Gary C

Celestron Astro Master 130mm f5 Newtonian GEM
Meade 114-EQ-DH f7.9 Newtonian w/ manual GEM
Bushnell 90mm f13.9 Catadioptric
Gskyer 80mm f5 Alt/Az refractor
Jason 10x50 Binoculars
Celestron 7x50 Binoculars
Svbony 2.1x42 Binoculars
(And a bunch of stuff I'm still trying to fix or find parts for.)
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Space Exploration”