Nuclear rockets revisited?

Discuss current topic regarding space exploration.
Post Reply
User avatar
AntennaGuy United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 1:20 am
4
Location: Tyler, TX USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Nuclear rockets revisited?

#1

Post by AntennaGuy »


See
https://phys.org/news/2019-07-earth-mar ... clear.html
Note: Not to be confused with:

:whistle:
* Meade 323 refractor on a manual equatorial mount.
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
Prof. Barnhardt to Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still: "There are several thousand questions I'd like to ask you.”
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Nuclear rockets revisited?

#2

Post by notFritzArgelander »


What could possibly go wrong? :lol:
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
GCoyote United States of America
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 2709
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 2:53 am
4
Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Status:
Offline

Re: Nuclear rockets revisited?

#3

Post by GCoyote »


I would like to see further development of this concept which would take a nuclear reactor to power.
http://www.adastrarocket.com/aarc/VASIMR
Any metaphor will tear if stretched over too much reality.
Gary C

Celestron Astro Master 130mm f5 Newtonian GEM
Meade 114-EQ-DH f7.9 Newtonian w/ manual GEM
Bushnell 90mm f13.9 Catadioptric
Gskyer 80mm f5 Alt/Az refractor
Jason 10x50 Binoculars
Celestron 7x50 Binoculars
Svbony 2.1x42 Binoculars
(And a bunch of stuff I'm still trying to fix or find parts for.)
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Nuclear rockets revisited?

#4

Post by notFritzArgelander »


GCoyote wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2019 7:48 pm I would like to see further development of this concept which would take a nuclear reactor to power.
http://www.adastrarocket.com/aarc/VASIMR
This is much more interesting than nukes! :)
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
helicon United States of America
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 592
Online
Posts: 12370
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
4
Location: Washington
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Nuclear rockets revisited?

#5

Post by helicon »


I hope there will be some future with nuclear rockets, but I imagine it will take time to develop the technology and guarantee safety.
-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
User avatar
Chich Canada
Pluto Ambassador
Articles: 0
Online
Posts: 492
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:40 am
4
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Nuclear rockets revisited?

#6

Post by Chich »


As long as they build it and fire it up in orbit. Project Orion from the cold war was a scary proposal.

Then there was SLAM, which would have been able to fly for weeks or months at a time. Not able to work in space but cool in a freaky 50's kind of way. If only it didn't have that nasty potential to poison everything it flew over.

Ah, such simple times when anything was possible and damned the safety features :)

But the ideas were workable and technology is much more advanced. Sounds like they may be on to something.
Image
Keep calm and set SCE To AUX

Wildland fire: a strong tradition since 440,000,000 BCE
NEW for 345,000,000 BCE - Crown fires!
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Nuclear rockets revisited?

#7

Post by notFritzArgelander »


Launch from Earth is hazardous. Building in space is more interesting.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
Gfamily Wales
Saturn Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 315
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 12:47 pm
4
Location: North Cheshire, UK
Status:
Offline

Re: Nuclear rockets revisited?

#8

Post by Gfamily »


With the Tintin books having been written in the 50s, their propulsion was by Nuclear Power

Image
LS8 Meade SCT, SW 127 Mak, 72mm Lightwave Refractor
Star Adventurer
AZ Gti mount
www.midcheshireastro.co.uk for astro company
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Space Exploration”