The numbers don’t lie—NASA’s move to commercial space has saved money

Discuss current topic regarding space exploration.
Post Reply
User avatar
smp United States of America
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 3423
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 10:34 pm
4
Location: NH, USA
Status:
Offline

The numbers don’t lie—NASA’s move to commercial space has saved money

#1

Post by smp »


From Ars Technica:
"When NASA astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken blast off inside a Crew Dragon spacecraft later this month, they will not only launch into space. They will also inaugurate a potentially transformative era for the space agency.

No private company has ever launched humans into orbit before. Therefore the success of their mission, and others to come in the near future, may go a long way toward determining whether the promise of commercial spaceflight and lower cost access to space becomes the new reality."

https://arstechnica.com/features/2020/0 ... ved-money/

smp
Stephen
- - - - -
Telescopes: Questar 3.5 Standard SN 18-11421; Stellina (EAA)
Solar: Thousand Oaks white light filter; Daystar Quark (chromosphere) Hα filter
Mounts: Explore Scientific Twilight I; Majestic heavy duty tripod
Local Club: New Hampshire Astronomical Society
User avatar
smp United States of America
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 3423
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 10:34 pm
4
Location: NH, USA
Status:
Offline

Re: The numbers don’t lie—NASA’s move to commercial space has saved money

#2

Post by smp »


From the Ars Technica Rock Report today:
"Medium Rockets"

"NASA got a stunning value in the Falcon 9. With the first flight of humans atop a Falcon 9 rocket coming as early as next Wednesday, Ars takes a look back at the origins of NASA's commercial crew and cargo programs. As part of its initial investment of $396 million into SpaceX, NASA got development of the Cargo Dragon, Falcon 9, and a launch site at Cape Canaveral.

A cost of 50 times more ... At the same time, NASA was developing the Ares I rocket to fly crew into low Earth orbit. Independent estimates placed the cost of Ares I at about $20 billion. President Obama ultimately canceled the Ares I, projected to have a similar lift capacity to the modern Falcon 9 booster, because it was behind schedule and over budget. The agency, in turn, got a bargain."

https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/05 ... n-delayed/

smp
Stephen
- - - - -
Telescopes: Questar 3.5 Standard SN 18-11421; Stellina (EAA)
Solar: Thousand Oaks white light filter; Daystar Quark (chromosphere) Hα filter
Mounts: Explore Scientific Twilight I; Majestic heavy duty tripod
Local Club: New Hampshire Astronomical Society
User avatar
Ylem United States of America
Universal Ambassador
Articles: 0
Online
Posts: 7562
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 2:54 am
4
Location: Ocean County, New Jersey
Status:
Online

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: The numbers don’t lie—NASA’s move to commercial space has saved money

#3

Post by Ylem »


Really makes Boeing and Lockheed look like Losers...
Clear Skies,
-Jeff :telescopewink:


Member; ASTRA-NJ



Orion 80ED
Celestron C5, 6SE, Celestar 8
Vixen Porta Mount ll
Coronado PST
A big box of Plossls
Little box of filters
:D



Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Space Exploration”