Well that's pretty far out and magical unless you have a calculation. Where is it?metastable wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:09 pm I previously said gravitymetastable wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:05 pm If they’re initially close enough could gravity become significant?
I would assess it as nonexistent. There is no physics, just numerology.metastable wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:29 pm I don't have a calculation other than the charge breakdown (+2/3) + (-3/3) + ((+2/3)+(+2/3)+(+2/3)+(-3/3)+(-3/3)) = (-1/3) so I'm willing to dismiss the idea as I agree the supporting evidence isn't close to overwhelming.
Not clear what you are referencing. If you are referring to the Standard Model SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) symmetry hierarchy and it's spontaneous symmetry breaking, well it is quite successful. There are arguments about the suitability of GR for inclusion in that scheme.
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
