via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
https://time.com/5744094/find-dark-matt ... DRfSCC7H5A
Reasonable article from a former fan of WIMPs.
To be fair, Dr H's POV is: "This article is notable for not even mentioning the possibility that dark matter is not a particle." Dr H has been holding out for alternative gravity theories that have been falsified, though.
The only "non particle" explanations I like are massive topological defects in spacetime. Other particles such as axions and Kaluza-Klein particles have not been adequately explored.
Next project will be to update the scorecard on performance of alternative gravity theories I had at the other place.
Reasonable article from a former fan of WIMPs.
To be fair, Dr H's POV is: "This article is notable for not even mentioning the possibility that dark matter is not a particle." Dr H has been holding out for alternative gravity theories that have been falsified, though.
The only "non particle" explanations I like are massive topological defects in spacetime. Other particles such as axions and Kaluza-Klein particles have not been adequately explored.
Next project will be to update the scorecard on performance of alternative gravity theories I had at the other place.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- Michael131313
- Orion Spur Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 5:39 pm
- 4
- Location: San Jose del Valle , Nayarit, Mexico
- Status:
Offline
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
Thanks n_FA. Waiting for your updated scorecard on performance of alternative gravity theories. Enjoyed them.
ES AR 102 102mm, f/6.5, ES 254mm f/5 DOB, Obie 10x50, GSO SV 30mm, ES 68° 20mm, ES 82° 14mm, 11mm, 8.8 mm, 6.8mm, 4.7mm. Twilight 1 mount.
- pakarinen
- Inter-Galactic Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 4029
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 3:33 pm
- 4
- Location: NE Illinois
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
IIRC, she was / is advocating some kind of superfluid? I just skimmed it, so the details never registered.
=============================================================================
I drink tea, I read books, I look at stars when I'm not cursing clouds. It's what I do.
=============================================================================
AT50, AT72EDII, ST80, ST102; Scopetech Zero, AZ-GTi, AZ Pronto; Innorel RT90C, Oberwerk 5000; Orion Giantview 15x70s, Vortex 8x42s, Navy surplus 7x50s, Nikon 10x50s
I drink tea, I read books, I look at stars when I'm not cursing clouds. It's what I do.
=============================================================================
AT50, AT72EDII, ST80, ST102; Scopetech Zero, AZ-GTi, AZ Pronto; Innorel RT90C, Oberwerk 5000; Orion Giantview 15x70s, Vortex 8x42s, Navy surplus 7x50s, Nikon 10x50s
- AntennaGuy
- Milky Way Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 1:20 am
- 4
- Location: Tyler, TX USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
That's a different Dr. H. You're thinking Hossenfelder. nFA linked to Hooper. (I was initially confused, too.)
* Meade 323 refractor on a manual equatorial mount.
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
Prof. Barnhardt to Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still: "There are several thousand questions I'd like to ask you.”
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
Prof. Barnhardt to Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still: "There are several thousand questions I'd like to ask you.”
- metastable
- Pluto Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:00 pm
- 4
- Location: California
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
I've been wondering whether the down quark could be a composite particle. Suppose it consisted of 3 electrons and 4 up quarks, this would have the same charge as a down quark. Also in the case of a free neutron decay, if the 3 electrons and 4 up quarks split up into the up quark (which remains to form the proton), the electron (beta particle), and another composite of 2 electron and 3 up quarks, this would have 0 charge. Could a 5 particle composite of 2 electrons and 3 up quarks be the neutrino and dark matter?
- AntennaGuy
- Milky Way Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 1:20 am
- 4
- Location: Tyler, TX USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
It's been too long since I studied particle physics, but I strongly suspect your speculations are inconsistent with established QED/QCD physics and experimental confirmations thereof. But if not, then this could get interesting...metastable wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 4:45 pm I've been wondering whether the down quark could be a composite particle. Suppose it consisted of 3 electrons and 4 up quarks, this would have the same charge as a down quark. Also in the case of a free neutron decay, if the 3 electrons and 4 up quarks split up into the up quark (which remains to form the proton), the electron (beta particle), and another composite of 2 electron and 3 up quarks, this would have 0 charge. Could a 5 particle composite of 2 electrons and 3 up quarks be the neutrino and dark matter?
* Meade 323 refractor on a manual equatorial mount.
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
Prof. Barnhardt to Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still: "There are several thousand questions I'd like to ask you.”
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
Prof. Barnhardt to Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still: "There are several thousand questions I'd like to ask you.”
- helicon
- Co-Administrator
- Articles: 592
- Posts: 12356
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
- 4
- Location: Washington
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
Thanks for posting this article notFritz - highly interesting and there are future research ramifications.
-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
She's been pushing the limp noodle of Verlinde's emergent gravity, which is a relativistic version of MOND.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
Sorry. I quoted Sabine Hossenfelder's (Dr H) criticism of Hooper's article. You can get ok galaxy rotation curves only for galaxies with "the average" dark matter content. For different DM abundances Verlinde's theory and MOND fail. Hooper knows this but Hossenfelder's not acknowledged it yet.AntennaGuy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 4:18 pmThat's a different Dr. H. You're thinking Hossenfelder. nFA linked to Hooper. (I was initially confused, too.)
For anything else (Big Bang nucleosynthesis, large structure and galaxy formation) MOND and Verlinde's are useless.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
The electron does not interact via the strong interaction so the size of a down quark structure you propose would be fixed by the electromagnetic interaction alone. It would be on the order of a hydrogen atom's size. This is contradicted by deep inelastic scattering results that show that down quarks are smaller than the proton.metastable wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 4:45 pm I've been wondering whether the down quark could be a composite particle. Suppose it consisted of 3 electrons and 4 up quarks, this would have the same charge as a down quark. Also in the case of a free neutron decay, if the 3 electrons and 4 up quarks split up into the up quark (which remains to form the proton), the electron (beta particle), and another composite of 2 electron and 3 up quarks, this would have 0 charge. Could a 5 particle composite of 2 electrons and 3 up quarks be the neutrino and dark matter?
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- metastable
- Pluto Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:00 pm
- 4
- Location: California
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
If they’re initially close enough could gravity become significant?
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
There are two answers depending on how close they are. The distance at which the answers differ is the Planck length.metastable wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:05 pm If they’re initially close enough could gravity become significant?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length
1) For separations larger than the Planck length the answer is definitely no. The reason is that for such separations we know that gravitation is extremely weak compared to electromagnetism. Comparing the dimensionless fine structure constants of the two forces shows this.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravita ... g_constant
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
2) For smaller than Planck length separations the answer is that there is no answer. A quantum gravity theory would be required and we don't have a clear winner there.
However any hypothesis that the down quark is a composite particle would have to make a prediction that differs from the Standard Model and is confirmed experimentally.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
The above was a purely theoretical answer. The experimental situation is that deep inelastic scattering first revealed that quarks were point like entities within hadrons, not mere mathematical conveniences. This was established in the 1960s and 1970s so, old hat.notFritzArgelander wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:45 pmThere are two answers depending on how close they are. The distance at which the answers differ is the Planck length.metastable wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:05 pm If they’re initially close enough could gravity become significant?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length
1) For separations larger than the Planck length the answer is definitely no. The reason is that for such separations we know that gravitation is extremely weak compared to electromagnetism. Comparing the dimensionless fine structure constants of the two forces shows this.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravita ... g_constant
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
2) For smaller than Planck length separations the answer is that there is no answer. A quantum gravity theory would be required and we don't have a clear winner there.
However any hypothesis that the down quark is a composite particle would have to make a prediction that differs from the Standard Model and is confirmed experimentally.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_inelastic_scattering
The experimental situation has not changed much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark#Size
In QCD, quarks are considered to be point-like entities, with zero size. As of 2014, experimental evidence indicates they are no bigger than 10^−4 times the size of a proton, i.e. less than 10^−19 metres.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- metastable
- Pluto Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:00 pm
- 4
- Location: California
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
Is there any way this could be tested? It seems like at least a mildly significant coincidence that 3 electrons and 4 up quarks have the same charge as a down quark, and dividing them in the manner described gives the same composite charges as the free neutron decay products as well...metastable wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 4:45 pm Suppose it consisted of 3 electrons and 4 up quarks, this would have the same charge as a down quark. Also in the case of a free neutron decay, if the 3 electrons and 4 up quarks split up into the up quark (which remains to form the proton), the electron (beta particle), and another composite of 2 electron and 3 up quarks, this would have 0 charge. Could a 5 particle composite of 2 electrons and 3 up quarks be the neutrino and dark matter?
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
Is there any chance that one could get funding for such a test? No. It already fails consistency tests with known physics. For the reasons given above it's physical nonsense. Physics tests require physics ideas not numerological coincidences.metastable wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 6:53 pmIs there any way this could be tested? It seems like at least a mildly significant coincidence that 3 electrons and 4 up quarks have the same charge as a down quark, and dividing them in the manner described gives the same composite charges as the free neutron decay products as well...metastable wrote: ↑Sat Dec 14, 2019 4:45 pm Suppose it consisted of 3 electrons and 4 up quarks, this would have the same charge as a down quark. Also in the case of a free neutron decay, if the 3 electrons and 4 up quarks split up into the up quark (which remains to form the proton), the electron (beta particle), and another composite of 2 electron and 3 up quarks, this would have 0 charge. Could a 5 particle composite of 2 electrons and 3 up quarks be the neutrino and dark matter?
Your idea is DOA, dead on arrival, since it is incompatible with experiments already done.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- metastable
- Pluto Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:00 pm
- 4
- Location: California
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
Well I know that under ordinary circumstances color confinement forbids it, but not necessarily in quark gluon plasma--
"Since the energy scale of inflation and the Planck scale are relatively close, some of the quantum fluctuations that have made up the structure in our universe were smaller than the Planck length before inflation. Therefore, there ought to be corrections from Planck-scale physics, in particular the unknown quantum theory of gravity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)
You had said that there is no answer if they are closer than the planck length... but I thought during inflation the whole universe was smaller than the planck length and at temperatures necessary for quark gluon plasma. The prediction would be that neutrinos are heavier than thought unless the binding energy negates some of that mass discrepency.
"Since the energy scale of inflation and the Planck scale are relatively close, some of the quantum fluctuations that have made up the structure in our universe were smaller than the Planck length before inflation. Therefore, there ought to be corrections from Planck-scale physics, in particular the unknown quantum theory of gravity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)
You had said that there is no answer if they are closer than the planck length... but I thought during inflation the whole universe was smaller than the planck length and at temperatures necessary for quark gluon plasma. The prediction would be that neutrinos are heavier than thought unless the binding energy negates some of that mass discrepency.
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
FALSE! Contradicted by deep inelastic scattering results since the 1960s-1970s AND experiments on quark gluon plasmas done at SPS and LHC at CERN, and at RHIC. All these use point quarks. A composite quark would give different results.metastable wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:18 pm Well I know that under ordinary circumstances color confinement forbids it, but not necessarily in quark gluon plasma--
A person competent to think about the idea of the down quark being composite would have the ability to self criticize and discard the idea as already incoherent with what is known.
FALSE! The whole universe is infinite and flat always even while the observable universe gets close to being Planck length small."Since the energy scale of inflation and the Planck scale are relatively close, some of the quantum fluctuations that have made up the structure in our universe were smaller than the Planck length before inflation. Therefore, there ought to be corrections from Planck-scale physics, in particular the unknown quantum theory of gravity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)
You had said that there is no answer if they are closer than the planck length... but I thought during inflation the whole universe was smaller than the planck length and at temperatures necessary for quark gluon plasma.
What prediction? You have no prediction. You only have an appeal to quantum gravity as though it were Harry Potter's magic wand.The prediction would be that neutrinos are heavier than thought unless the binding energy negates some of that mass discrepency.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- metastable
- Pluto Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:00 pm
- 4
- Location: California
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
I'm willing to dismiss the idea while noting the QGPs done at the SPS, LHC and RHIC didn't reach the same temperatures and densities as inflation QGP.
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
More magical thinking. Why do you think that the composite nature of the down quark would reveal itself at higher energies? What binds your proposal so tightly that it looks point like at all available energies? You need a new magical force field. What's your proposal?metastable wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:00 pm I'm willing to dismiss the idea while noting the QGPs done at the SPS, LHC and RHIC didn't reach the same temperatures and densities as inflation QGP.
Is it another Yang-Mills field? What is its gauge symmetry?
So far it looks more like Hogwarts Academy than the Institute for Advanced Study.
Last edited by notFritzArgelander on Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- metastable
- Pluto Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 9:00 pm
- 4
- Location: California
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: via Dr H: will we ever find DM?
I previously said gravity
metastable wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:05 pm If they’re initially close enough could gravity become significant?
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute