RNA base in asteroid samples suggests origins of life on Earth: Study

Discuss Astrophysics.
Post Reply
User avatar
helicon United States of America
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 592
Online
Posts: 12355
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
4
Location: Washington
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

RNA base in asteroid samples suggests origins of life on Earth: Study

#1

Post by helicon »


-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
User avatar
Ylem United States of America
Universal Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 7542
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 2:54 am
4
Location: Ocean County, New Jersey
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: RNA base in asteroid samples suggests origins of life on Earth: Study

#2

Post by Ylem »


This made our local news a few days ago, pretty fascinating.

So much to discover out there :)
Clear Skies,
-Jeff :telescopewink:


Member; ASTRA-NJ



Orion 80ED
Celestron C5, 6SE, Celestar 8
Vixen Porta Mount ll
Coronado PST
A big box of Plossls
Little box of filters
:D



User avatar
Gmetric Great Britain
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 6:08 am
4
Location: Japan
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: RNA base in asteroid samples suggests origins of life on Earth: Study

#3

Post by Gmetric »


Thanks for that, Michael. Finding uracil within uncontaminated asteroid material is a good catch and certainly bolsters the RNA argument. One wonders about the time scales of when and how uracil formed within the regolith of Ryugu by comparison to the time scales on earth. Ryugu went through some changes during its evolution, some of which were quite recent by comparison to Earth's history. The paper suggests that uracil doesn't hold up too well when subjected to energetic processes, hence the lower values of uracil in comparison to other samples. Given that some of the recent changes on the surface of Ryugu were well after life had started to evolve on earth and were quite energetic, the window of opportunity diminishes quite significantly. I guess it's a question of whether abiogenesis started before or after the late heavy bombardment period and whether the LHB was responsible for depositing all of the necessary material for abiogenesis. Thought-provoking for sure. Thanks again :)
Arry (Bortle 7 area)

Telescopes: Sky-Watcher ED72II, Sky-Watcher PDS130, Sky-Explorer SN F4 200mm astrograph and Vixen F11.1 90mm
Cameras: Nikon D5300 modded, Canon Kiss X8i modded, Cooled Canon kiss X4 modded, Atik 16IC and 383 colour, ASI120MC, QHY5LII
Mount: Sky-Explorer HEQ 5 belt driven
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Astrophysics”