SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?

Discuss Astrophysics.
Post Reply
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?

#1

Post by notFritzArgelander »


Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
ThinkerX United States of America
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 595
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2019 11:19 pm
4
Location: Alaska
Status:
Offline

Re: SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?

#2

Post by ThinkerX »


This makes the risky assumption that terrestrial planets all have similar densities. Titan and Mars, for example, are roughly the same size, but differ substantially in mass (according to my admittedly shaky memory). Therefore, a large 'low density' 'super-Earth' could avoid becoming a 'Mini-Neptune.'

Okay...it's way past time for a new planetary classification scheme, one that can be introduced into what's left of the public school system without undo havoc...
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?

#3

Post by notFritzArgelander »


I’m not so sure that a low density super earth is terribly possible. At least not within the ice line. Mars is this side of the ice line while Titan is on the other.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
ThinkerX United States of America
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 595
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2019 11:19 pm
4
Location: Alaska
Status:
Offline

Re: SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?

#4

Post by ThinkerX »


Earth to Mars density, then:

https://phys.org/news/2015-12-mars-earth.html

In terms of their size and mass, Earth and Mars are quite different. With a mean radius of 6371 km and a mass of 5.97×1024 kg, Earth is the fifth largest and fifth most-massive planet in the Solar System, and the largest of the terrestrial planets. Mars, meanwhile, has a radius of approximately 3,396 km at its equator (3,376 km at its polar regions), which is the equivalent of roughly 0.53 Earths. However, it's mass is just 6.4185 x 1023 kg, which is around 15% that of Earth's.
Might be an 'ice line' thing, might be something else.

Venus is closer, about 5% less dense than Earth.

Super-Earths in lower metallicity systems, hmm...could be say twice the size of Earth with only half the density. And have some interesting geologies.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Astrophysics”