SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- ThinkerX
- Orion Spur Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2019 11:19 pm
- 4
- Location: Alaska
- Status:
Offline
Re: SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?
This makes the risky assumption that terrestrial planets all have similar densities. Titan and Mars, for example, are roughly the same size, but differ substantially in mass (according to my admittedly shaky memory). Therefore, a large 'low density' 'super-Earth' could avoid becoming a 'Mini-Neptune.'
Okay...it's way past time for a new planetary classification scheme, one that can be introduced into what's left of the public school system without undo havoc...
Okay...it's way past time for a new planetary classification scheme, one that can be introduced into what's left of the public school system without undo havoc...
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?
I’m not so sure that a low density super earth is terribly possible. At least not within the ice line. Mars is this side of the ice line while Titan is on the other.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- ThinkerX
- Orion Spur Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2019 11:19 pm
- 4
- Location: Alaska
- Status:
Offline
Re: SWaB: Ask Ethan: Are “super-Earths” really the most common planets in the Universe?
Earth to Mars density, then:
https://phys.org/news/2015-12-mars-earth.html
Venus is closer, about 5% less dense than Earth.
Super-Earths in lower metallicity systems, hmm...could be say twice the size of Earth with only half the density. And have some interesting geologies.
https://phys.org/news/2015-12-mars-earth.html
Might be an 'ice line' thing, might be something else.
In terms of their size and mass, Earth and Mars are quite different. With a mean radius of 6371 km and a mass of 5.97×1024 kg, Earth is the fifth largest and fifth most-massive planet in the Solar System, and the largest of the terrestrial planets. Mars, meanwhile, has a radius of approximately 3,396 km at its equator (3,376 km at its polar regions), which is the equivalent of roughly 0.53 Earths. However, it's mass is just 6.4185 x 1023 kg, which is around 15% that of Earth's.
Venus is closer, about 5% less dense than Earth.
Super-Earths in lower metallicity systems, hmm...could be say twice the size of Earth with only half the density. And have some interesting geologies.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute