cosmic rays contribute to supernova luminosity

Discuss Astrophysics.
Post Reply
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

cosmic rays contribute to supernova luminosity

#1

Post by notFritzArgelander »


Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
AntennaGuy United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 1:20 am
4
Location: Tyler, TX USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: cosmic rays contribute to supernova luminosity

#2

Post by AntennaGuy »


Hmm. "...the team ran simulations of the evolution of the shockwaves emanating from supernovae explosions over several million years." I expect that, to be accurate, such computer models would have to be prepared and executed very carefully. (I create much simpler physics models, and yet I always have to worry about possible errors.) It will be interesting to see if this model stands the test of time.
* Meade 323 refractor on a manual equatorial mount.
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
Prof. Barnhardt to Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still: "There are several thousand questions I'd like to ask you.”
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: cosmic rays contribute to supernova luminosity

#3

Post by notFritzArgelander »


AntennaGuy wrote: Tue Jul 20, 2021 3:09 am Hmm. "...the team ran simulations of the evolution of the shockwaves emanating from supernovae explosions over several million years." I expect that, to be accurate, such computer models would have to be prepared and executed very carefully. (I create much simpler physics models, and yet I always have to worry about possible errors.) It will be interesting to see if this model stands the test of time.
Agreed. Running different computer models at radically different length and time scales is required for these results. It's a bit of a black art.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Astrophysics”