claim pulsar system of evidence for phase transition in pulsar

Discuss Astrophysics.
Post Reply
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

claim pulsar system of evidence for phase transition in pulsar

#1

Post by notFritzArgelander »


https://phys.org/news/2021-06-astronome ... r-psr.html

the system is odd. this would be a first, a neutron star transitioning to a strange star.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_star

More later after I read the paper.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: claim pulsar system of evidence for phase transition in pulsar

#2

Post by notFritzArgelander »


This is good work!

https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05717
PSR J1946+3417 is a millisecond pulsar (MSP) with a spin period P≃3.17 ms. Harbored in a binary with an orbital period Pb≃27 days, the MSP is accompanied by a white dwarf (WD). The masses of the MSP and the WD were determined to be 1.83 M⊙ and 0.266 M⊙, respectively. Specially, its orbital eccentricity is e≃0.134, which is challenging the recycling model of MSPs. Assuming that the neutron star in a binary may collapse to a strange star when its mass reaches a critical limit, we propose a phase transition (PT) scenario to account for the origin of the system. The sudden mass loss and the kick induced by asymmetric collapse during the PT may result in the orbital eccentricity. If the PT event takes place after the mass transfer ceases, the eccentric orbit can not be re-circularized in the Hubble time. Aiming at the masses of both components, we simulate the evolution of the progenitor of PSR J1946+3417 via \texttt{MESA}. The simulations show that a NS / main sequence star binary with initial masses of 1.4+1.6 M⊙ in an initial orbit of 2.59 days will evolve into a binary consisting of a 2.0 M⊙ MSP and a 0.27 M⊙ WD in an orbit of ∼21.5 days. Assuming that the gravitational mass loss fraction during PT is 10%, we simulate the effect of PT via the kick program of \texttt{BSE} with a velocity of σPT=60 km s−1. The results show that the PT scenario can reproduce the observed orbital period and eccentricity with higher probability then other values.
Bolding is my emphasis. The eccentricity is very unlikely original. Tidal dampening would circularize an initially eccentric orbit. The energetics, a loss of 10% of gravitational mass due to the phase transition, is on the order of what a SN releases in forming a neutron star.
So this is the first credible scenario by which observation provides a clue to the existence of matter at higher than neutron star density. I particularly like that they didn't just run a bunch of computer simulations, there was a serious analytic effort too provide formulae that constrain the phenomenon.

The phase transition happens in the core. The accretion column provides an external asymmetry that provides the velocity kick into the eccentric orbit.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
turboscrew
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 3233
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:22 am
3
Location: Nokia, Finland
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: claim pulsar system of evidence for phase transition in pulsar

#3

Post by turboscrew »


Quite exciting! Probably more work is needed to confirm that (beyound reasonable doubt).
- Juha

Senior Embedded SW Designer
Telescope: OrionOptics XV12, Mount: CEM120, Tri-pier 360 and alternative dobson mount.
Grab 'n go: Omegon AC 102/660 on AZ-3 mount
Eyepieces: 26 mm Omegon SWAN 70°, 15 mm TV Plössl, 12.5 mm Baader Morpheus, 10 mm TV Delos, 6 mm Baader Classic Ortho, 5 mm TV DeLite, 4 mm and 3 mm TV Radians
Cameras: ZWO ASI 294MM Pro, Omegon veLOX 178C
OAG: TS-Optics TSOAG09, ZWO EFW 7 x 36 mm, ZWO filter sets: LRGB and Ha/OIII/SII
Explore Scientific HR 2" coma corrector, Meade x3 1.25" Barlow, TV PowerMate 4x 2"
Some filters (#80A, ND-96, ND-09, Astronomik UHC)
Laptop: Acer Enduro Urban N3 semi-rugged, Windows 11
LAT 61° 28' 10.9" N, Bortle 5

I don't suffer from insanity. I'm enjoying every minute of it.

Image
User avatar
helicon United States of America
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 592
Online
Posts: 12366
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
4
Location: Washington
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

Re: claim pulsar system of evidence for phase transition in pulsar

#4

Post by helicon »


Thanks for sharing the article notFritz. Very interesting.
-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Astrophysics”