Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
Come join the friendliest, most engaging and inclusive astronomy forum geared for beginners and advanced telescope users, astrophotography devotees, plus check out our "Astro" goods vendors.
and isn't it interesting that Black Stars may not need a singularity (solving that part of the problem)?
or are you talking about that when you mention the Planck Density?
for that matter, what does the Black Hole singularity problem come from?
is it that gravity at the BH center becomes infinite?
or something else becomes infinite? (and thus wrong?)
chasmanian wrote: ↑Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:30 am
fascinating nFA. thank you.
and isn't it interesting that Black Stars may not need a singularity (solving that part of the problem)?
yes. singularities always tell me that the theory is incomplete and inapplicable.
or are you talking about that when you mention the Planck Density?
for that matter, what does the Black Hole singularity problem come from?
is it that gravity at the BH center becomes infinite?
or something else becomes infinite? (and thus wrong?)
it's a mix.
even for a vacuum BH with not a speck of matter in it, say the non rotating Schwarzschild case for example, the singularity at the center is a place where the curvature of spacetime is infinite. so General Relativity fails at some point before the singularity is reached.
now for a BH made of matter or some other form of "stuff" the mass density also becomes infinite with the same conclusion.
so for a vacuum BH spacetime curvature becomes infinite, a big bugaboo.
for a matter BH both the spacetime curvature and the matter density become infinite. 2 big bugaboos for the price of one BH. such a deal!
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
chasmanian wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 4:29 am
thank you very much nFA.
so very interesting, all you wrote.
am thinking about neutron stars, etc now.
googling around, saw a comment somewhere, if you throw an apple onto a neutron star,
it will turn into a BH. hmmm.
hmm indeed. it's not quite that simple. it has to be a maximum critical mass for that to happen. and whether or not it is maximum mass there will be fireworks from the apple. about 10% of the apple's rest mass will be converted into energy in the collision. so for a 100 g apple that is about a million billion joules of energy.
wiki:
"4.2×10^15 J Energy released by explosion of 1 megaton of TNT"
which would be 4 apples, but yeah wow, that is one heck of a lot of energy from 1 little piece of fruit.
hahaha
its reminding me of the Monty Python skit with John Cleese and the banana:
would you please tell me if you have any thoughts about this?
could it be possible that Black Stars AND Black Holes both exist?
My understanding is that it is not possible. The underlying physics requires either one or the other.
Let me correct that. I was wrong. There is a loophole. I've had a half cup of tea and realized my error.
Primordial vacuum BHs could coexist with Black Stars. Mergers of BHs and Black Stars would tell us more about the Black Stars than about the Black Holes. So far there is no way to tell apart mergers of vacuum BHs from mergers of non vacuum BHs.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
Sorry I'm late to the party. Is the reason for energy density always being positive a result of the photon being its own anti particle? Or am I confusing this with something else?
Any metaphor will tear if stretched over too much reality.
Gary C
Celestron Astro Master 130mm f5 Newtonian GEM
Meade 114-EQ-DH f7.9 Newtonian w/ manual GEM
Bushnell 90mm f13.9 Catadioptric
Gskyer 80mm f5 Alt/Az refractor
Jason 10x50 Binoculars
Celestron 7x50 Binoculars
Svbony 2.1x42 Binoculars
(And a bunch of stuff I'm still trying to fix or find parts for.)