SWaB: the Standard Model is insufficient

Discuss Astrophysics.
Post Reply
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

SWaB: the Standard Model is insufficient

#1

Post by notFritzArgelander »


Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
AntennaGuy United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 1:20 am
4
Location: Tyler, TX USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: SWaB: the Standard Model is insufficient

#2

Post by AntennaGuy »


Heh. Someone might want to suggest to Ethan that maybe it's actually better that this problem isn't too easy to solve! What would we ever do with all those many subsequently-unemployed particle theorists (that is, the ones insufficiently charismatic to host PBS TV shows or similar entertainment about the universe?) (Note: Experimentalists can typically find employment in industry, doing work as moderately-adequate engineers; that worked out for me!) There are days I regret abandoning the pursuit of particle physics, but stories like this one help me feel much better about it! And I mean that only partly in jest. I am now convinced that basic particle physics experiments will continue until long after I am dead. And perhaps there will still be enough interesting surprises ahead to make it all worthwhile for those who devote their lives to it.
:popcorn:
* Meade 323 refractor on a manual equatorial mount.
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
Prof. Barnhardt to Klaatu in The Day the Earth Stood Still: "There are several thousand questions I'd like to ask you.”
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: SWaB: the Standard Model is insufficient

#3

Post by notFritzArgelander »


AntennaGuy wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:02 am Heh. Someone might want to suggest to Ethan that maybe it's actually better that this problem isn't too easy to solve! What would we ever do with all those many subsequently-unemployed particle theorists (that is, the ones insufficiently charismatic to host PBS TV shows or similar entertainment about the universe?) (Note: Experimentalists can typically find employment in industry, doing work as moderately-adequate engineers; that worked out for me!) There are days I regret abandoning the pursuit of particle physics, but stories like this one help me feel much better about it! And I mean that only partly in jest. I am now convinced that basic particle physics experiments will continue until long after I am dead. And perhaps there will still be enough interesting surprises ahead to make it all worthwhile for those who devote their lives to it.
:popcorn:
I expect that progress is going to become slower, more laborious, and costly.

Theoretical particle physicists typically find employment in quantitative finance. So when the next market crash happens, you know who to blame. :lol: Unemployed theoretical astrophysicists find jobs in bomb factories. :)
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
helicon United States of America
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 592
Online
Posts: 12361
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
4
Location: Washington
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

Re: SWaB: the Standard Model is insufficient

#4

Post by helicon »


It's true that there has been an influx of "quant" guys in the financial industry, enough to be caricatured in the media. For example in the film "The big short" about the packaging up of mortgages into CDOs (collateralized debt obligations). Jeff Bezos was a quant guy at an investment bank before starting Amazon. So yeah, I would expect to see physicists in some of these occupations.
-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Astrophysics”