using Jupiter to find BHs
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
using Jupiter to find BHs
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- seigell
- Jupiter Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 4:59 pm
- 4
- Location: Florida, USA
- Status:
Offline
Re: using Jupiter to find BHs
Well, in this article, they did at least commit to answer the "within or outside the volume of the Sun" question. But not with any degree of accuracy: "...rather it is closer to the surface of the star."
(Which, if one scans the semantics, doesn't actually answer the inside vs outside question after all...)
(Which, if one scans the semantics, doesn't actually answer the inside vs outside question after all...)
ES AR152 / ES 80ED Apo / Orion 8in F/3.9 / C9.25-SCT / C6-SCT / C10-NGT / AT6RC / ST-80 / AstroView 90 / Meade 6000 APO 115mm
CGEM (w HyperTune and ADM bling) / 2x CG5-AGT / Forest of Tripod legs / Star Adventurer / Orion EQ-G
550D (Modded-G.Honis) / 60D / 400D / NexImage / NexGuide / Mini 50 SSAG / ST-8300C / ASI120MM-S / ASI1600MM-Cool
Dark Skies in SW CO when I can get there, and badly light polluted backyard when I can't... (Currently Self-Exiled to Muggy Central Florida...)
CGEM (w HyperTune and ADM bling) / 2x CG5-AGT / Forest of Tripod legs / Star Adventurer / Orion EQ-G
550D (Modded-G.Honis) / 60D / 400D / NexImage / NexGuide / Mini 50 SSAG / ST-8300C / ASI120MM-S / ASI1600MM-Cool
Dark Skies in SW CO when I can get there, and badly light polluted backyard when I can't... (Currently Self-Exiled to Muggy Central Florida...)
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: using Jupiter to find BHs
The purpose of the research is not to answer that question, though. In fact depending on the position of the planets it could be inside or outside the Sun's surface. In that context "closer to the surface" simply means that when it is inside it's closer to the surface and when it is outside it is closer to the surface.seigell wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2020 8:40 pm Well, in this article, they did at least commit to answer the "within or outside the volume of the Sun" question. But not with any degree of accuracy: "...rather it is closer to the surface of the star."
(Which, if one scans the semantics, doesn't actually answer the inside vs outside question after all...)
The location of the solar system barycenter is dynamic and depends of how the planets are distributed at any given time. So it depends.
The original paper is here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.00595.pdf
A Wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycente ... e_the_Sun?
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- seigell
- Jupiter Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 4:59 pm
- 4
- Location: Florida, USA
- Status:
Offline
Re: using Jupiter to find BHs
Interesting read - at least the methodology (statistics employed were over my head).
It still didn't express an opinion on the Intra/extra-Solarity of the SSB (not that I could see).
However, it is rather difficult to see how the non-Jovian Planets could exert much of an impact on the SSB. Saturn contributes only 1/11th the Gravitation of Jupiter, the Ice Planets even less.
It still didn't express an opinion on the Intra/extra-Solarity of the SSB (not that I could see).
However, it is rather difficult to see how the non-Jovian Planets could exert much of an impact on the SSB. Saturn contributes only 1/11th the Gravitation of Jupiter, the Ice Planets even less.
ES AR152 / ES 80ED Apo / Orion 8in F/3.9 / C9.25-SCT / C6-SCT / C10-NGT / AT6RC / ST-80 / AstroView 90 / Meade 6000 APO 115mm
CGEM (w HyperTune and ADM bling) / 2x CG5-AGT / Forest of Tripod legs / Star Adventurer / Orion EQ-G
550D (Modded-G.Honis) / 60D / 400D / NexImage / NexGuide / Mini 50 SSAG / ST-8300C / ASI120MM-S / ASI1600MM-Cool
Dark Skies in SW CO when I can get there, and badly light polluted backyard when I can't... (Currently Self-Exiled to Muggy Central Florida...)
CGEM (w HyperTune and ADM bling) / 2x CG5-AGT / Forest of Tripod legs / Star Adventurer / Orion EQ-G
550D (Modded-G.Honis) / 60D / 400D / NexImage / NexGuide / Mini 50 SSAG / ST-8300C / ASI120MM-S / ASI1600MM-Cool
Dark Skies in SW CO when I can get there, and badly light polluted backyard when I can't... (Currently Self-Exiled to Muggy Central Florida...)
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: using Jupiter to find BHs
As I said, depending on where the planets are, it’s possible for it to be inside or outside the solar surface.seigell wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:51 pm Interesting read - at least the methodology (statistics employed were over my head).
It still didn't express an opinion on the Intra/extra-Solarity of the SSB (not that I could see).
However, it is rather difficult to see how the non-Jovian Planets could exert much of an impact on the SSB. Saturn contributes only 1/11th the Gravitation of Jupiter, the Ice Planets even less.
It’s a conceptual error to consider mass alone. The product of the mass and the radius vector determines the position of the barycenter. If you multiply mass times the distance you’re going to see how it works.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
- Graeme1858
- Co-Administrator
- Articles: 1
- Posts: 7443
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 7:16 pm
- 4
- Location: North Kent, UK
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
I Broke The Forum.
Re: using Jupiter to find BHs
like a spider sitting in stillness in the middle of her web
That conjures up quite a picture, a spider web the size of the solar system!
It will be interesting to see where NANOGrav goes with this as more data comes in.
Regards
Graeme
______________________________________________
Celestron 9.25 f10 SCT, f6.3FR, CGX mount.
ASI1600MM Pro, ASI294MC Pro, ASI224MC
ZWO EFW, ZWO OAG, ASI220MM Mini.
APM 11x70 ED APO Binoculars.
https://www.averywayobservatory.co.uk/
Celestron 9.25 f10 SCT, f6.3FR, CGX mount.
ASI1600MM Pro, ASI294MC Pro, ASI224MC
ZWO EFW, ZWO OAG, ASI220MM Mini.
APM 11x70 ED APO Binoculars.
https://www.averywayobservatory.co.uk/
- seigell
- Jupiter Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 4:59 pm
- 4
- Location: Florida, USA
- Status:
Offline
Re: using Jupiter to find BHs
Correct - only actually it is product of mass over radius vector squared. And that is how I derived the "1/11th of Jupiter's contribution" for Saturn (actually 1/11.018 - but who's counting?).notFritzArgelander wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:32 pmIt’s a conceptual error to consider mass alone. The product of the mass and the radius vector determines the position of the barycenter. If you multiply mass times the distance you’re going to see how it works.
And the Ice Planets??
Uranus = 1/302.6th Jupiter
Neptune = 1/620.4th of Jupiter
Even if all the major Planets were lined-up behind Jupiter, they wouldn't contribute much to disturbing the SSB.
And we can discount the Kuiper and Oort objects, as their masses are distributed roughly equal around the Sun (netting zero).
ES AR152 / ES 80ED Apo / Orion 8in F/3.9 / C9.25-SCT / C6-SCT / C10-NGT / AT6RC / ST-80 / AstroView 90 / Meade 6000 APO 115mm
CGEM (w HyperTune and ADM bling) / 2x CG5-AGT / Forest of Tripod legs / Star Adventurer / Orion EQ-G
550D (Modded-G.Honis) / 60D / 400D / NexImage / NexGuide / Mini 50 SSAG / ST-8300C / ASI120MM-S / ASI1600MM-Cool
Dark Skies in SW CO when I can get there, and badly light polluted backyard when I can't... (Currently Self-Exiled to Muggy Central Florida...)
CGEM (w HyperTune and ADM bling) / 2x CG5-AGT / Forest of Tripod legs / Star Adventurer / Orion EQ-G
550D (Modded-G.Honis) / 60D / 400D / NexImage / NexGuide / Mini 50 SSAG / ST-8300C / ASI120MM-S / ASI1600MM-Cool
Dark Skies in SW CO when I can get there, and badly light polluted backyard when I can't... (Currently Self-Exiled to Muggy Central Florida...)
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: using Jupiter to find BHs
No it is not the radius vector squared. It is the radius vector alone.seigell wrote: ↑Thu Jul 02, 2020 3:18 pmCorrect - only actually it is product of mass over radius vector squared. And that is how I derived the "1/11th of Jupiter's contribution" for Saturn (actually 1/11.018 - but who's counting?).notFritzArgelander wrote: ↑Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:32 pmIt’s a conceptual error to consider mass alone. The product of the mass and the radius vector determines the position of the barycenter. If you multiply mass times the distance you’re going to see how it works.
Squaring the radius vector gives the moment of inertia not the barycenter.
See this link for the correct definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of ... oordinates
Which is different from the moment of inertia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of ... Point_mass
It's the moment of inertia that involves the square. The center of mass / barycenter involves only the first power.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute