Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
- Ben Cartwright SASS
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 10:39 am
- 4
- Location: SE New England
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
BUT if you can't download 3.0 all is not lost. I had to download 4.0 to try my new Player 1 Neptune-M camera (I can't recommend it for solar).
after my imaging session today with my ASI174 and SC 3.0 I opened 4.0 and ran a few shots of the prom I was imaging and also of the surface. I haven't done the surface yet.
Here are the proms, which is 3.0 and which is 4.0 ( I know and will tell in a bit)
Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
Free advice is seldom cheap
"Sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it's not logical but it is true"
Commander Spock
Canon DSLR's R7, R6II, 5D, 7D2, 90D 21 lenses incl. 100-400L mk ii, 70-200L mk iii f/2.8, RF600/11
Lunt LS50 DS, LS80 DS, Lunt 102ED, Stellarvue SV80 APO, Orion ST80, 127 MAK, Skywatcher Evostar 120ED, 102 MAK, Celestron 8" Edge HD, 102AZ
Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro
ZWO ASI071MC-cool, ASI174mm, ASI174mm-cool, ASI178MC-cool, ASI290 mini, ASI120MM-S, ASI120MC Revolution Player One mm (178 chip)
- AstroBee Online
- Moderator
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:03 pm
- 4
- Location: Henderson, NV
- Status:
Online
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
Scopes: Celestron EdgeHD14", Explore Scientific ED152CF & ED127 APO's, StellarVue SV70T, Classic Orange-Tube C-8, Lunt 80mm Ha double-stack solar scope.
Mounts: Astro-Physics Mach One, iOptron CEM70EC Mount, iOptron ZEQ25 Mount.
Cameras: ZWO ASI2600mm Pro, ZWO 2600MC Pro, ZWO ASI1600mm
Filters: 36mm Chroma LRGB & 3nm Ha, OIII, SII, L-Pro, L-eXtreme
Eyepieces: 27mm TeleVue Panoptic, 4mm TeleVue Radian, Explore Scientific 82° 30mm, 6.7mm , Baader 13mm Hyperion, Explore Scientific 70° 10mm, 15mm, 20mm, Meade 8.8mm UWA
Software: N.I.N.A., SharpCapPro, PixInsight, PhotoShop CC, Phd2, Stellarium
https://www.nevadadesertskies.com
- notFritzArgelander
- In Memory
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 14925
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
- 4
- Location: Idaho US
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
Indeed it's tough. They are both very fine. But the bit about gamma control leads me to think that B is 4.0 based on slightly better internal contrast detail in the proms. That is unless gamma was cranked in the other direction!
- Ben Cartwright SASS
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 10:39 am
- 4
- Location: SE New England
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
the first picture "A" is the SC 4.0 B is SC 3.0
I always use 3.0 and two two separate exposures, the surface I set gamma to 1 and then for the proms I set gamma all the way to the right and then usually do 3 exposures at 100, 95 and 90 and then process and see which shows them the best.
I found that 3.0 and 4.0 for the chromosphere is virtually the same, you have to do a little more work in 4.0 in Photoshop to bring it up like 3.0 but the proms in 3.0 the gamma gives you more control
at least these are my findings
Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
Free advice is seldom cheap
"Sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it's not logical but it is true"
Commander Spock
Canon DSLR's R7, R6II, 5D, 7D2, 90D 21 lenses incl. 100-400L mk ii, 70-200L mk iii f/2.8, RF600/11
Lunt LS50 DS, LS80 DS, Lunt 102ED, Stellarvue SV80 APO, Orion ST80, 127 MAK, Skywatcher Evostar 120ED, 102 MAK, Celestron 8" Edge HD, 102AZ
Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro
ZWO ASI071MC-cool, ASI174mm, ASI174mm-cool, ASI178MC-cool, ASI290 mini, ASI120MM-S, ASI120MC Revolution Player One mm (178 chip)
- Lowjiber
- Articles: 2
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2019 12:30 pm
- 5
- Location: Las Vegas, Nv, USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
I'll stick with my 3.0 for as long as possible. Being able to apply Gamma is critical in my opinion.
Clear Skies
- Ben Cartwright SASS
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 10:39 am
- 4
- Location: SE New England
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
I agree with you 100%, only did the test because I had to download 4.0 to get the Player One Neptune-M to be recognized so decided to try it out for solar, I prefer 3.0 for solar 4.0 for
Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #59
Free advice is seldom cheap
"Sometimes having is not so pleasing as wanting, it's not logical but it is true"
Commander Spock
Canon DSLR's R7, R6II, 5D, 7D2, 90D 21 lenses incl. 100-400L mk ii, 70-200L mk iii f/2.8, RF600/11
Lunt LS50 DS, LS80 DS, Lunt 102ED, Stellarvue SV80 APO, Orion ST80, 127 MAK, Skywatcher Evostar 120ED, 102 MAK, Celestron 8" Edge HD, 102AZ
Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro
ZWO ASI071MC-cool, ASI174mm, ASI174mm-cool, ASI178MC-cool, ASI290 mini, ASI120MM-S, ASI120MC Revolution Player One mm (178 chip)
- messier 111
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 9719
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2020 2:49 am
- 3
- Location: Canada's capital region .
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Sharpcap 3.0 vs 4.0
REFRACTOR , TS-Optics Doublet SD-APO 125 mm f/7.8 . Lunt 80mm MT Ha Doublet Refractor .
EYEPIECES, Delos , Delite and 26mm Nagler t5 , 2 zoom Svbony 7-21 , Orion Premium Linear BinoViewer .
FILTER , Nebustar 2 tele vue . Apm solar wedge . contrast booster 2 inches .
Mounts , cg-4 motorized , eq6 pro belt drive .
“Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in a while, or the light won't come in.”
― Isaac Asimov
Jean-Yves
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute