EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

Discuss your 'Cats' here.
Post Reply
DMouse
Moon Ambassador
Articles: 0
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:23 pm
Location: Milton

TSS Photo of the Day

EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#1

Post by DMouse »

So, I used to own a second hand EDGE1100HD, and it had some mirror flop issues, so I sold it. I am currently using an f4 12 inch newt, and find using it visually a real pain. So I am considering going back to an SCT and wondered if anyone has an experience with the Meade ACF f10 12, compared to the EDGE1100HD? Out of the box, is mirror flop better with one than the other? I havent seen many Meades for sale second hand, and thats either because no one buys them or they dont sell them because they like them.
Are there any benefits from the Edge compared to the Meade?

Thanks

Paul
Scope: Takahashi FSQ106DX4, Teleskop Service 12 inch Truss Tube RC -- Mount: Bisque PMX+ -- Camera: ATIK383L+ mono, SBIG STi, ZWO120mm-s, ZWO178MC
User avatar
JayTee
Co-Administrator
Articles: 1
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:23 am
Location: Honolulu, HI
Contact:

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#2

Post by JayTee »

Hi Paul,

The Celestron Edge telescopes are supposed to have mirror locks on them to prevent mirror flop. Were the mirror locks not installed or non-functional on the Edge telescope that you used?

Cheers,
JT
∞ Scopes: Celestron CPC1100 #2 Scope: 8" f/7.5 Dob AP Scopes: TPO 6" f/9 RC, ES 80mm f/6 APO G&G Scopes: Meade 102mm f/7.8, Bresser 102mm f/4.5 Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs
∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM60, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000
∞ Cameras: Canon T3i (x2), ZWO ASI294MC Pro & 120MC, Orion SSAG
∞ Binos: 10X50,10.5X70,15X70², 25X100
∞ EPs: ES: 21 100°, 30 82° X-Cels: 9, 12, 18, 25 GSO:15,20
Home Wx (click)

I never met a scope I didn't want to keep. "My God, it's full of stars." Searching the skies since 1966!
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
Universal Ambassador
Articles: 0
Posts: 8145
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
Location: Idaho US

TSS Awards Badges

Re: EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#3

Post by notFritzArgelander »

I used to own a 9.25 Edge and had no issues whatsoever with mirror flop. In this and other regards it outperformed the plain vanilla 9.25 SCT. I'm considering as a large cat, either the 11" Edge or the Vixen VMC260L.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker III, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5, Orion Sirius EQG
User avatar
AntennaGuy
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 1:20 am
Location: Tyler, TX USA

Re: EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#4

Post by AntennaGuy »

I've been thinking/planning to someday buy a Celestron 11" Edge HD (to put in my future/someday observatory!) so I would like to learn more about this issue! So far, I have been leaning fairly heavily toward the Celestron 11" Edge HD rather than the competing Meade 12" LX200 ACF, specifically because: (1) there is less field curvature in the Edge HD, and my eyes aren't getting any younger, and (2) my fear that the electronics in Meade's mount just might fail catastrophically, like apparently many have done in the past, and then that Meade might abandon me (based on reports I've read with horror, on various astronomy forums) with no way to fix/service it if that happens. Reliability of hardware is a big deal! Now, if Meade were to offer a superior product warranty (say 5+ years, and preferably 10) I might consider the Meade. But at present, the Celestron warranty is actually the better one (2 yrs, vs 1 yr for Meade) and I also don't see people posting complaints of the Celestron mounts failing.
* Meade 323 refractor on a manual equatorial mount.
* Celestron C6 SCT on a Twilight 1 Alt-Az mount
* Losmandy GM8G mount.
* Vixen VMC260L on order.
User avatar
XCalRocketMan
Jupiter Ambassador
Articles: 0
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 8:09 pm
Location: Reisterstown, MD USA
Contact:

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#5

Post by XCalRocketMan »

I own the EdgeHD11 and the optics are excellent. As for the mirror flop, there is a little, the mirror locks work but if you are planning AP with autofocusing you wont be able to use the locks. The flop is there but very small - manageable. It generally shows up after a meridian flip.
Scopes/Mounts Celestron EdgeHD-11 on AP1100GTO mount w/APCCpro; William Optics GT102 on iOptron iEQ30 Pro; Criterion Dynamax-8 SCT
Lenses Hyperstar-III; Celestron 0.7x FR; WO Flat/Reducer 0.8x
Guiding Celestron OAG w/ASI174mm mini; Orion ST80; WO 50mm
Cameras and Filters ZWOASI1600mm Pro (ZWO LRGB and Astrodon Ha-5nm, Oiii-3nm, Sii-5nm), QHY10, Canon 50D; ASI174mm mini; ASI462MC; ASI120MC
Misc Moonlite focuser on Edge - Feather-Touch focuser on iOptron; ZWO 31mm FW; Kendrick Dew System, Temp-est Fans
Software SN8; SGP; APT; BYE; PHD; MG; FlexRX; PSP; PI; Registax; FireCapture; SharpCap
User avatar
Mandrew
Moon Ambassador
Articles: 0
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2019 5:07 am
Location: USA Illinois

Re: EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#6

Post by Mandrew »

Mirror flop seems to be inherently part of SCTs, look at the newer classical cassigrains if you can find some.
Devout bino lover and Lunaholic! Scopes - Celestron RASA 8, Orion 180mm Mak-Cass, 6"f8 dob, ST80. binos - Orion 7x50, Oberwerk 8x56 LW, Oberwerk 10x50 Deluxe, 15x70 Deluxe, Oberwerk 100mm ED Binocular telescope.
User avatar
yobbo89
Moderator
Articles: 0
Posts: 1750
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:44 pm
Location: australia qld brisbane

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#7

Post by yobbo89 »

My 12 " Meade was put together poorly, lots of backlash on the mirror focuser, I had to retap the knob because it wasn't taped correctly, so I can only advise a hit or miss, other then that the performance is pretty good. I would bite the bullet and get a crayford focuser. My opinion is that celestron seems to have better qa and support and overall a slightly better product only based on online readings and having a meade 12"
scopes :gso/bintel f4 12"truss tube, bresser messier ar127s /skywatcher 10'' dob,meade 12'' f10 lx200 sct
cameras : asi 1600mm-c/asi1600mm-c,asi120mc,prostar lp guidecam, nikkon d60, sony a7,asi 290 mm
mounts : eq6 pro/eq8/mesu 200 v2
filters : 2'' astronomik lp/badder lrgb h-a,sII,oIII,h-b,Baader Solar Continuum, chroma 3nm ha,sii,oiii,nii,rgb,lowglow,uv/ir,Thousand Oaks Solar Filter,1.25'' #47 violet,pro planet 742 ir,pro planet 807 ir,pro planet 642 bp ir.
extras : skywatcher f4 aplanatic cc, Baader MPCC MKIII Coma Corrector,Orion Field Flattener,zwo 1.25''adc.starlight maxi 2" 9x filter wheel,tele vue 2x barlow .

Image
User avatar
Bigzmey
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 5
Posts: 2630
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:55 pm
Location: San Diego, CA USA

TSS Awards Badges

Re: EDGE 1100HD vs Meade 12 F10 ACF

#8

Post by Bigzmey »

It seems that it is hit and miss with mirror flop. My 8" SCT (the newest model) has almost none, and older EdgeHD 9.25" has more. However, you can get external focuser and lock EdgeHD mirror.
Scopes: Stellarvue: SV102 ED F7; Celestron: 9.25" EdgeHD F10, 8" SCT F10, 6" SCT F10, Omni XLT 150R Achro F5, Onyx 80ED F6.3; Meade: 80ST Achro F5.
Mounts: ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; UA: MicroStar.
Binos: Orion: Little Giant II 15x70, WorldView 10x50, Nikon: Action EX 16x50 & 8x40.
EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68s; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV; Russell Optics: SuperPlossls.
Diagonals: Baader: BBHS silver mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: Positive lock prism.
Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S; Astronomik: UHC, Orion: UltraBlock, SkyGlow.
Observing: DSOs: 2005 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 1565, S110: 77). Doubles: 1382, Comets: 18, Asteroids: 88
Post Reply

Return to “Catadioptric telescopes”