As promised, my report of the first light.
At arrival in the original box the 6 inch was in a perfect condition. No scratschmarks, no stains, no dust inside. The first owner used it as a photographic instrument and had mounted a far better focusser than the original. I had seen his pictures with this instrument and knew nothing could be wrong optically either.It seemed a bit lighter than my fully equipped 4.7 inch. Soon I found out that was not the case once fully equipped.
It came with two Vixen dovetails, one of which was used as a handlebar and photographic platform. The gap between handlebar and tube was rather narrow so I enlarged it by adding some extra nuts. Since the new TS-focusser had no finder-shoe-holder, I used the handlebar to act like a good base for that. Drilling and tapping an already home-made existing hole took care of that.
Time for mounting. Balancing showed me that I had to move one counterweight a bit outside. I had to shove the tube down in the cradle and mount the middle of the dovetail a bit off the middle. While looking at the zenit I want to sit down on a small stool, still I have to bend a lot, but luckily I won't have to sit on the floor. The picture above shows the balanced telescope.
I aligned the finder on some trees far away, it was not really dark yet and in the meantime found out I could not reach sharp focus. Since It had been designed for use with a 2" mirror, focus was far more further away than I could reach with the 1.25" Zeiss prism. Yes, Mark, I put in the prism from the start.
A comparison of its behavior with a mirror will follow in near future:-)) Luckily I still had a 2" extension tube from previous experiments. It fitted of course and focussing problems were over.
Time to check if the telescope sits on the mount the same way as my 120mm refractor does. It does. Vega was still in the memory and after entering it showed up in the 30mm Eudiascopic eyepiece. I checked collimation with my Pentax XO 2.58, at 300X and found out it was all right. The startest on Altair did not reveal major problems. I was a bit surprised about the small Airydisc, until I remembered that an F5 system produces smaller Airydiscs then a F7.5 Nice promise for double stars. A bit of
coma in the order of 1/10 wave, but nothing to be alarmed, quite normal for its budget range. Spherical aberration seems to be in the order of 1/5 to 1/6 wave. According to the program Aberrator it should even be better. I did not check on axial astigmatisme, but as I did not detect it in the first place, it should be low-leveled. This refractor meets the 0.8 Strehl limit effortlessly.
Since it was a very misty night, the Summer-triangle was the only naked eye-object, I wondered how much this telescope should reveal on some
DSO's I had in mind. I put in a UHC filter and went for M27. I was not surprised to see it quite clearly and I could detect its form. M57 was even more clear and sharply defined. I nodded, this is how I wanted it to be. M71 ( without the UHC) was visible, but without the well known little stars. M15 showed individual stars in its periphery. I wondered how M13 would look like. Surprisingly well, as if I looked down a ( dark) sugarpot.
The one issue almost every review keeps dragging on about, the
CA ( as if there is nothing else to remark about this telescope), is no issue for me. Surely I saw a blue halo around Wega an Altair, but I think it was a moderate one. I was not impressed. Maybe due to the use of a prism instead of a mirror, but I am gonna find out. Saturn was all right. Jupiter showed some cloudbelts and zones, the
GRS ( ever so clear) and was certainly not what I am used to in my 120mm
Apo. Well, it is not made for Jupiter, that's for sure. But it shows me 99% of all other objects with a big smile.
I could have been going on like that for several hours, despite the very bad circumstances. But the weather worsened , I saw lightning on the horizon and heard rumbling. So I called it the day and went in. Satisfied. Can't wait for a real transparent night.