APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

Discuss your refractor type scopes here.
User avatar
Bigzmey United States of America
Moderator
Moderator
Articles: 8
Offline
Posts: 7548
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:55 pm
4
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#21

Post by Bigzmey »


I like were this discussion is going. Hand figured doublets and triplets come at premium. Most of us are looking at mass-produced scopes in particular in larger aperture.

At one point I had a choice between similarly priced ES 127mm APO triplet and SW 120mm ED doublet. My understanding is that the larger scope gets the harder is to get the same level of CA correction in a doublet compared to triplet. So, I went with ES, because it was triplet, had larger aperture (hey, every mm counts! :)) and I knew that I can rely on ES customer service if there will be any issues.

I was very happy with ES 127mm performance. I don't believe I saw as sharply defined airy disks in my other fracs which all happened to be doublets. It could be just seeing, I did not do comparison on the same night, also the aperture sizes are different. But we are talking about cumulative experience based on multiple sessions. At one point I had ES 102mm triplet and now have Stellarvue 102mm doublet. I don't believe I ever saw Jupiter as sharply defined in SV compared to ES, but the color saturation seems better in SV (the colors could be because of upgraded diagonal). Again apples to oranges, different nights. Maybe higher position of Jupiter.

I did not think of it much until I read Jones comments, which seem to match my experience.
Scopes: Stellarvue: SV102ED; Celestron: 9.25" EdgeHD, 8" SCT, 150ST, Onyx 80ED; iOptron: Hankmeister 6" Mak; SW: 7" Mak; Meade: 80ST.
Mounts: SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; iOptron: AZMP; ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; UA: MicroStar.
Binos: APM: 100-90 APO; Canon: IS 15x50; Orion: Binoviewer, LG II 15x70, WV 10x50, Nikon: AE 16x50, 10x50, 8x40.
EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68, 62; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV.
Diagonals: Baader: BBHS mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: 2" prism.
Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S, 6-color set; Astronomik: UHC.

Observing: DSOs: 3106 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 2180, S110: 77). Doubles: 2382, Comets: 34, Asteroids: 255
User avatar
WilliamPaolini United States of America
Saturn Ambassador
Articles: 9
Offline
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 8:57 pm
2
Location: Virginia, USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#22

Post by WilliamPaolini »


I have only heard good reports from APM 140 users. Color correction is a bit better than their 152 ED Apo, which I have. I see no noticeable false color from my 152 at any magnification. If I go to extremes I can coax some out though, so it really is fully Apo visually IMO. And on planets, which is my primary passion, it is superb. Like any telescope if you want the top performance then it needs to be precisely collimated and thoroughly acclimated. Once that is achieved with the 152 it is a stunning planetary performer, so the 140 should be just as good.

IMO, a triplet is overkill for visual and simply not worth it when the doublet is well color corrected, like the APM 140 and 152. But cool down with a 152 can take some time, so when I go out into very cold temps then it can take a full 2 hours. If I am doing planetary I never wait less than 1 hour. The 140 should cool faster though.
-Bill

U.S.A.F. Veteran - Visual Amateur Astronomer since 1966 - Fully Retired since 2019
8" f/5 Newt - Lunt 152 f/7.9 - TSA 102 f/8 - Vixen 81S f/7.7 - P.S.T. - Pentax 65ED II - Nikon 12x50 AE
Pentax XWs - Baader Morpheus - Takahashi LEs - Edmund RKEs - BST Starguiders - 6ZAO-II/5XO/4Abbe
PM and Email communications always welcomed
User avatar
Jones
Mars Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2020 12:21 am
3
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#23

Post by Jones »


I have had about 40 refractors over the past 20 years.
And the ones I've kept are all triples, all visual use, all China made lenses, sourced from APM and Teleskop Service.
90mm f6.7
107mm f6.5
115MM F7
130MM F7
They give nearly the best planetary views you can buy without going too crazy price wise. Maybe the latest crop of doubles can match them. All doubles from the past cannot except a few with big price tags.
Arizona- where the sky's are not cloudy all night.

Triple lensed fracs are so yummy when looking at planets.
User avatar
Jones
Mars Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2020 12:21 am
3
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#24

Post by Jones »


Probably build one of those 125mm f8 doubles next. The one from TS Optics weighs 16 pounds. I can usually save 25% in weight the way I build ota's. So about 12 pounds total. Should work great on the Stellarvue M2 mount. Have been looking for the maximum scope to ride on an M2. The 115mm runs well on it. The 125 will be a little lighter but longer. On refractors every 10mm diameter increase counts.
Arizona- where the sky's are not cloudy all night.

Triple lensed fracs are so yummy when looking at planets.
User avatar
25585
Moon Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon May 24, 2021 11:15 am
2
Location: UK
Status:
Offline

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#25

Post by 25585 »


Lady Fraktor wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 6:04 pm You seem to be comparing mass produced to premium optics which you just cannot do.

Mass produced optics will only have a standard of QC at a set price point, where a premium optic QC level will be much higher.

Occasionally you will find a Meade, Skywatcher, Celestron that is better than the rest of their offerings but it is priced accordingly as well.
Those few telescopes get a higher QC level than the rest.
An example is some of the high end Skywatcher that were designed in Belgium (Lichtenknecker Optics), not in China.
Is that the Esprits?
Unashamed Linda Ronstadt ♡ fan! :dance: :Clap:

Eyepieces from: Aero, Antares, APM, Baader, Brandon, Bresser, Celestron, Datysun, Docter, Explore Scientific, GSO, I R Poyser, Meade, Nikon, Orion, Pentax, Rodenstock, Siberia, Sky-Watcher, Taiso, Takahashi, TAL, Tele Vue, TS, Vernonscope, Vixen, Zeiss.

Scopes from: Altair, Bresser, Lumicon, Orion Optics UK, Sky-Watcher, Takahashi, Tele Vue, TS, Vixen.
User avatar
Lady Fraktor Slovakia
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 9860
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
4
Location: Slovakia
Status:
Offline

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#26

Post by Lady Fraktor »


Esprit, Evostar I guess it depends on the area you purchase it in.
See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
The only culture I have is from yogurt
My day was going well until... people
Image
User avatar
25585
Moon Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon May 24, 2021 11:15 am
2
Location: UK
Status:
Offline

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#27

Post by 25585 »


Lady Fraktor wrote: Sun Jun 13, 2021 6:47 pm Esprit, Evostar I guess it depends on the area you purchase it in.
Esprits are triplets & Evostars doublets. There were early collimation issues with Esprits (& other makes) I think, it was one of the reasons I bought a Takahashi TSA-120 triplet instead, never any reported issues & only good reviews.
Unashamed Linda Ronstadt ♡ fan! :dance: :Clap:

Eyepieces from: Aero, Antares, APM, Baader, Brandon, Bresser, Celestron, Datysun, Docter, Explore Scientific, GSO, I R Poyser, Meade, Nikon, Orion, Pentax, Rodenstock, Siberia, Sky-Watcher, Taiso, Takahashi, TAL, Tele Vue, TS, Vernonscope, Vixen, Zeiss.

Scopes from: Altair, Bresser, Lumicon, Orion Optics UK, Sky-Watcher, Takahashi, Tele Vue, TS, Vixen.
User avatar
John Baars Netherlands
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 5
Online
Posts: 2723
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 9:00 am
4
Location: Schiedam, Netherlands
Status:
Online

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#28

Post by John Baars »


25585 wrote: Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:31 pm Been in my subconscious tempting me. (...)
https://www.cloudynights.com/articles/c ... 20portable.
After reading the review I can imagine your subconscious temptations. The same happened to me. :shock:
It's a doublet, beware!
After reading this discussion so far I would say go for it!
I haven't seen it on the APM site yet. Is there already a price known?
Refractors in frequency of use : *SW Evostar 120ED F/7.5 (all round ), * Vixen 102ED F/9 (vintage), both on Vixen GPDX.
GrabnGo on Alt/AZ : *SW Startravel 102 F/5 refractor( widefield, Sun, push-to), *OMC140 Maksutov F/14.3 ( planets).
Most used Eyepieces: *Panoptic 24, *Morpheus 14, *Leica ASPH zoom, *Zeiss barlow, *Pentax XO5.
Commonly used bino's : *Jena 10X50 , * Canon 10X30 IS, *Swarovski Habicht 7X42, * Celestron 15X70, *Kasai 2.3X40
Rijswijk Public Observatory: * Astro-Physics Starfire 130 f/8, * 6 inch Newton, * C9.25, * Meade 14 inch LX600 ACF, *Lunt.
Amateur astronomer since 1970.
User avatar
WilliamPaolini United States of America
Saturn Ambassador
Articles: 9
Offline
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 8:57 pm
2
Location: Virginia, USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#29

Post by WilliamPaolini »


John Baars wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:40 pm
After reading the review I can imagine your subconscious temptations. The same happened to me. :shock:
It's a doublet, beware!
After reading this discussion so far I would say go for it!
I haven't seen it on the APM site yet. Is there already a price known?
[/quote]

It is on the APM website - https://www.apm-telescopes.de/en/telesc ... -tube.html

For US buyers on the Lunt site - https://luntsolarsystems.com/shop/apm/a ... ical-tube/

I doubt there is any visible CA on it as I have the APM 152 ED Doublet and the only thing I get a very very slight purple fringe on is Sirius. Everything else nada. And the color correction on the 140 is slightly better due to the use of FPL-53. Only thing I do not particularly like about the 140 is that for economies they used the same tube as the 152. So same girth as a 152, just shorter. Would have been nice if they slimmed the tube to 140. Otherwise have heard nothing but good reports. I am very pleased with my 152.
-Bill

U.S.A.F. Veteran - Visual Amateur Astronomer since 1966 - Fully Retired since 2019
8" f/5 Newt - Lunt 152 f/7.9 - TSA 102 f/8 - Vixen 81S f/7.7 - P.S.T. - Pentax 65ED II - Nikon 12x50 AE
Pentax XWs - Baader Morpheus - Takahashi LEs - Edmund RKEs - BST Starguiders - 6ZAO-II/5XO/4Abbe
PM and Email communications always welcomed
User avatar
25585
Moon Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon May 24, 2021 11:15 am
2
Location: UK
Status:
Offline

Re: APM 140mm ED, my next intended.

#30

Post by 25585 »


WilliamPaolini wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:58 pm
John Baars wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:40 pm
After reading the review I can imagine your subconscious temptations. The same happened to me. :shock:
It's a doublet, beware!
After reading this discussion so far I would say go for it!
I haven't seen it on the APM site yet. Is there already a price known?
It is on the APM website - https://www.apm-telescopes.de/en/telesc ... -tube.html

For US buyers on the Lunt site - https://luntsolarsystems.com/shop/apm/a ... ical-tube/

I doubt there is any visible CA on it as I have the APM 152 ED Doublet and the only thing I get a very very slight purple fringe on is Sirius. Everything else nada. And the color correction on the 140 is slightly better due to the use of FPL-53. Only thing I do not particularly like about the 140 is that for economies they used the same tube as the 152. So same girth as a 152, just shorter. Would have been nice if they slimmed the tube to 140. Otherwise have heard nothing but good reports. I am very pleased with my 152.
[/quote]

Tak FS refractors had larger bore tubes, so the APM is in good company. Bigger focusers are easier to provide, thinking of my grenade eyepieces etc.
Unashamed Linda Ronstadt ♡ fan! :dance: :Clap:

Eyepieces from: Aero, Antares, APM, Baader, Brandon, Bresser, Celestron, Datysun, Docter, Explore Scientific, GSO, I R Poyser, Meade, Nikon, Orion, Pentax, Rodenstock, Siberia, Sky-Watcher, Taiso, Takahashi, TAL, Tele Vue, TS, Vernonscope, Vixen, Zeiss.

Scopes from: Altair, Bresser, Lumicon, Orion Optics UK, Sky-Watcher, Takahashi, Tele Vue, TS, Vixen.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Refractor type Telescopes”