Design or optical quality???

Discuss your refractor type scopes here.
User avatar
TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
Mars Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
4
Location: UAE
Status:
Offline

Design or optical quality???

#1

Post by TareqPhoto »


Hi,

I want to know when buying a refractor, which is more important to have:

1. A triplet but with ED optics
2. A doublet but with Fluorite or FPL-53 optics

So if can't afford both or the type of scope i want can't be in both of above and only one of above, what will be the choice?

All scopes are well made and nice quality manufactured so no one will come to say that this build quality is better than the other one, so assume all are with excellent build quality.
    Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
      Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
        Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
          Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
            Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
            User avatar
            yobbo89 Australia
            Moderator
            Moderator
            Articles: 0
            Offline
            Posts: 2560
            Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:44 pm
            4
            Location: australia qld brisbane
            Status:
            Offline

            TSS Photo of the Day

            Re: Design or optical quality???

            #2

            Post by yobbo89 »


            This question always comes up , there are people more qualified then me on the topic for these two scopes.you'll have to hold on!

            i'm just going on a hunch, i would assume that both are good quality scopes, then the triplet would be corrected better with colour ?.
            i naturaly would budget on a purchase and pick the cheaper one ie probably the doublet and do narrowband imaging .and if i used a osc i would pick the tripplet .

            are the scopes the same aperture and fl ?
            scopes :gso/bintel f4 12"truss tube, bresser messier ar127s /skywatcher 10'' dob,meade 12'' f10 lx200 sct
            cameras : asi 1600mm-c/asi1600mm-c,asi120mc,prostar lp guidecam, nikkon d60, sony a7,asi 290 mm
            mounts : eq6 pro/eq8/mesu 200 v2
            filters : 2'' astronomik lp/badder lrgb h-a,sII,oIII,h-b,Baader Solar Continuum, chroma 3nm ha,sii,oiii,nii,rgb,lowglow,uv/ir,Thousand Oaks Solar Filter,1.25'' #47 violet,pro planet 742 ir,pro planet 807 ir,pro planet 642 bp ir.
            extras : skywatcher f4 aplanatic cc, Baader MPCC MKIII Coma Corrector,Orion Field Flattener,zwo 1.25''adc.starlight maxi 2" 9x filter wheel,tele vue 2x barlow .

            Image
            User avatar
            TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
            Mars Ambassador
            Articles: 0
            Offline
            Posts: 135
            Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
            4
            Location: UAE
            Status:
            Offline

            Re: Design or optical quality???

            #3

            Post by TareqPhoto »


            yobbo89 wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:49 pm This question always comes up , there are people more qualified then me on the topic for these two scopes.you'll have to hold on!

            i'm just going on a hunch, i would assume that both are good quality scopes, then the triplet would be corrected better with colour ?.
            i naturaly would budget on a purchase and pick the cheaper one ie probably the doublet and do narrowband imaging .and if i used a osc i would pick the tripplet .

            are the scopes the same aperture and fl ?
            Ok, i will give you 3 or 4 options or examples of scopes which are in mind or i am talking about

            https://www.firstlightoptics.com/askar- ... graph.html

            https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/pr ... icate.html

            https://agenaastro.com/sharpstar-61mm-f ... dphii.html

            https://www.firstlightoptics.com/takaha ... actor.html

            Each with either a flattener or a reducer, so what do you think? I could add more like doublets but i think one example with Fluorite instead of FPL-53 is the best option to include anyway
              Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                  Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                    Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                      Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                      User avatar
                      Lady Fraktor Slovakia
                      Co-Administrator
                      Co-Administrator
                      Articles: 0
                      Offline
                      Posts: 9860
                      Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
                      4
                      Location: Slovakia
                      Status:
                      Offline

                      Re: Design or optical quality???

                      #4

                      Post by Lady Fraktor »


                      Both of your points are not that important actually.

                      FPL-53, FPL-51, FPL-55, FCD-1, FCD-100, FK-61 including Fluorite are all Extra Low Dispersion glasses (though Fluorite is a crystal).
                      They all have Fluorite in the glass formula.

                      A triplet does not necessarily give better colour correction than a doublet but a triplet will give you slightly more reach into the IR and the UV.

                      As long as the element is properly designed for the telescope they will all work well.

                      The purpose of using a Extra Low Dispersion element is the ability to make a shorter focal ratio telescope than one of similar colour correction in a achromat.

                      If you are worried about actual quality of the telescope then I would recommend you purchase the Takahashi.
                      See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
                      EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
                      Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
                      Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
                      Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
                      Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
                      The only culture I have is from yogurt
                      My day was going well until... people
                      Image
                      User avatar
                      TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                      Mars Ambassador
                      Articles: 0
                      Offline
                      Posts: 135
                      Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                      4
                      Location: UAE
                      Status:
                      Offline

                      Re: Design or optical quality???

                      #5

                      Post by TareqPhoto »


                      Lady Fraktor wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 6:58 pm Both of your points are not that important actually.

                      FPL-53, FPL-51, FPL-55, FCD-1, FCD-100, FK-61 including Fluorite are all Extra Low Dispersion glasses (though Fluorite is a crystal).
                      They all have Fluorite in the glass formula.

                      A triplet does not necessarily give better colour correction than a doublet but a triplet will give you slightly more reach into the IR and the UV.

                      As long as the element is properly designed for the telescope they will all work well.

                      The purpose of using a Extra Low Dispersion element is the ability to make a shorter focal ratio telescope than one of similar colour correction in a achromat.

                      If you are worried about actual quality of the telescope then I would recommend you purchase the Takahashi.
                      I care about having better colors with a scope at range of 280mm up to 320mm at most, do you know any scope at this range not expensive with nice colors corrected? I said 280mm not 250mm and 320mm not 360mm.
                        Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                          Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                            Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                              Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                User avatar
                                Lady Fraktor Slovakia
                                Co-Administrator
                                Co-Administrator
                                Articles: 0
                                Offline
                                Posts: 9860
                                Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
                                4
                                Location: Slovakia
                                Status:
                                Offline

                                Re: Design or optical quality???

                                #6

                                Post by Lady Fraktor »


                                I can read, no need to repeat yourself. ;)

                                The only one I can think of offhand is this: https://www.bresser.de/Astronomie/Teles ... L55ss.html

                                There are likely others available though.
                                If you just want colour correction then a doublet will work as well as a triplet unless you want the extra UV and IR ability.
                                See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
                                EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
                                Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
                                Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
                                Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
                                Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
                                The only culture I have is from yogurt
                                My day was going well until... people
                                Image
                                User avatar
                                TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                                Mars Ambassador
                                Articles: 0
                                Offline
                                Posts: 135
                                Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                                4
                                Location: UAE
                                Status:
                                Offline

                                Re: Design or optical quality???

                                #7

                                Post by TareqPhoto »


                                Lady Fraktor wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 7:51 pm I can read, no need to repeat yourself. ;)

                                The only one I can think of offhand is this: https://www.bresser.de/Astronomie/Teles ... L55ss.html

                                There are likely others available though.
                                If you just want colour correction than a doublet will work as well as a triplet unless you want the extra UV and IR ability.
                                Ok, you also forgot reducers that can reduce the focal length to 270-320mm somehow with some scopes such as 60-70mm scopes maybe.

                                Is this scope highly recommended?

                                In another site same question it went far as one member only pointing about issues with any option i choose, so it is like there is no option of what i want, otherwise i have to accept any risk with issues then.

                                All what i want is a scope in this range between 280mm up to 320mm so i can use either Ha filter or Lum filter only with it, because i will use it in my dual imaging system which i will be using a 90mm F/6 triplet which also i am not sure about its quality and 0.65x reducer and future plan of color APS-C camera, i can't copy same this one again as each item is so expensive, so i won't buy APS-C twice or 0.65x twice, so definitely not 90mm F/6 if i want wider field with this combo, so i was thinking about 50-70mm options as long i will use only one filter or two anyway, they told me Ha isn't an issue and i know that, the issue is with Lum filter because it is exposed to all visible spectrum wavelength, so it will show issues from color in final processing even if i do colors in separate scope as triplet or even a reflector, so for that reason i try not get something not good enough with Lum filter then, i don't want to be forced with narrowbanbing only.
                                  Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                                    Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                                      Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                                        Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                          Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                          User avatar
                                          Lady Fraktor Slovakia
                                          Co-Administrator
                                          Co-Administrator
                                          Articles: 0
                                          Offline
                                          Posts: 9860
                                          Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
                                          4
                                          Location: Slovakia
                                          Status:
                                          Offline

                                          Re: Design or optical quality???

                                          #8

                                          Post by Lady Fraktor »


                                          The Vixen is a popular telescope, more in EU than America but Vixen is better liked overall in EU.

                                          You will have to decide on what compromises you need to make as there are not many refractors in this very short range.
                                          I would avoid the Askar at least until actual reviews are posted, a triplet should not require a sub-aperture corrector and two different types of ED elements to get good colour correction.

                                          Sharpstar has a good reputation if the 61mm will work for you.
                                          See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
                                          EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
                                          Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
                                          Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
                                          Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
                                          Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
                                          The only culture I have is from yogurt
                                          My day was going well until... people
                                          Image
                                          User avatar
                                          TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                                          Mars Ambassador
                                          Articles: 0
                                          Offline
                                          Posts: 135
                                          Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                                          4
                                          Location: UAE
                                          Status:
                                          Offline

                                          Re: Design or optical quality???

                                          #9

                                          Post by TareqPhoto »


                                          Lady Fraktor wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 8:23 pm The Vixen is a popular telescope, more in EU than America but Vixen is better liked overall in EU.

                                          You will have to decide on what compromises you need to make as there are not many refractors in this very short range.
                                          I would avoid the Askar at least until actual reviews are posted, a triplet should not require a sub-aperture corrector and two different types of ED elements to get good colour correction.

                                          Sharpstar has a good reputation if the 61mm will work for you.
                                          Good to know about Vixen, because when i look at my site astro reference mostly which is Astrobin, i really don't see much results from that Vixen scope, and i didn't see many results around, so that put it into suspicious status for me, but if you claim that is really popular in Eu then i don't mind, in fact i am not in Eu nor in USA, so it doesn't matter where is this scope or that is getting popular and more uses as long it is a good choice, so i will read more about it.

                                          I did ask or included Takahahsi FS-60CB into questions around, but it sounds this scope isn't representing a high quality scope from many answers or votes, i just thought a Fluorite doublet from Takahashi should outperforms any FPL-53 doublet from China, but some claimed that they saw issues with it, it means i shouldn't put it as top vote then.

                                          I looked at Askar and Sharpstar scopes, new tempting scopes, but i feel they are still unknown about their optics and its quality, i wanted Askar FRA400 more as i saw someone used this scope with 294 mono camera and amazing results, but even with those nice results when i show in the other site they managed to find issues, so for them all results are bad until it is free from issues [CA, halo, astigmatism, coma,....etc]
                                            Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                                              Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                                                Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                                                  Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                                    Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                                    User avatar
                                                    Lady Fraktor Slovakia
                                                    Co-Administrator
                                                    Co-Administrator
                                                    Articles: 0
                                                    Offline
                                                    Posts: 9860
                                                    Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
                                                    4
                                                    Location: Slovakia
                                                    Status:
                                                    Offline

                                                    Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                    #10

                                                    Post by Lady Fraktor »


                                                    Sharpstar has been producing fine telescopes for decades, though I have not heard of Askar before and I have already said above why I would avoid it as a AP refractor.
                                                    Visually it would probably be fine.
                                                    See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
                                                    EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
                                                    Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
                                                    Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
                                                    Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
                                                    Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
                                                    The only culture I have is from yogurt
                                                    My day was going well until... people
                                                    Image
                                                    User avatar
                                                    TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                                                    Mars Ambassador
                                                    Articles: 0
                                                    Offline
                                                    Posts: 135
                                                    Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                                                    4
                                                    Location: UAE
                                                    Status:
                                                    Offline

                                                    Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                    #11

                                                    Post by TareqPhoto »


                                                    Lady Fraktor wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 5:12 am Sharpstar has been producing fine telescopes for decades, though I have not heard of Askar before and I have already said above why I would avoid it as a AP refractor.
                                                    Visually it would probably be fine.
                                                    The only Sharpstar scope in my mind is that 61EDPH II, sounds a great small wide field one as i want, but look at Askar FRA400 also, it is no less than this Askar, it is a quintuplet, but i feel like it became the war of who can make nicer look scope as there is also Radian Raptor 61, in the same league of Sharpstar and Askar, and that making it even more difficult to choose.

                                                    Can you judge a scope that is great amazing for narrowbanding to be used for broadbanding targets also?
                                                      Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                                                        Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                                                          Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                                                            Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                                              Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                                              User avatar
                                                              Lady Fraktor Slovakia
                                                              Co-Administrator
                                                              Co-Administrator
                                                              Articles: 0
                                                              Offline
                                                              Posts: 9860
                                                              Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
                                                              4
                                                              Location: Slovakia
                                                              Status:
                                                              Offline

                                                              Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                              #12

                                                              Post by Lady Fraktor »


                                                              TareqPhoto wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 1:25 pm Can you judge a scope that is great amazing for narrowbanding to be used for broadbanding targets also?
                                                              Unfortunately I cannot tell something that specific.
                                                              I can look at a design and get an idea of how it should operate in general, this is why I have commented about the Askar as one to possibly take off of the list.
                                                              See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
                                                              EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
                                                              Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
                                                              Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
                                                              Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
                                                              Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
                                                              The only culture I have is from yogurt
                                                              My day was going well until... people
                                                              Image
                                                              User avatar
                                                              TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                                                              Mars Ambassador
                                                              Articles: 0
                                                              Offline
                                                              Posts: 135
                                                              Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                                                              4
                                                              Location: UAE
                                                              Status:
                                                              Offline

                                                              Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                              #13

                                                              Post by TareqPhoto »


                                                              Lady Fraktor wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:06 pm
                                                              TareqPhoto wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 1:25 pm Can you judge a scope that is great amazing for narrowbanding to be used for broadbanding targets also?
                                                              Unfortunately I cannot tell something that specific.
                                                              I can look at a design and get an idea of how it should operate in general, this is why I have commented about the Askar as one to possibly take off of the list.
                                                              Funny thing is that in another forum or site and also on Facebook groups, Askar got high votes, so that means it is really a nice scope, even some pointed that they had issue or CA with Sharpstar 61 scope, so the new scope won and a scope that is out for a while didn't meet full expectation much, i won't get blind about it then.
                                                                Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                                                                  Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                                                                    Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                                                                      Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                                                        Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                                                        User avatar
                                                                        notFritzArgelander
                                                                        In Memory
                                                                        In Memory
                                                                        Articles: 0
                                                                        Offline
                                                                        Posts: 14925
                                                                        Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
                                                                        4
                                                                        Location: Idaho US
                                                                        Status:
                                                                        Offline

                                                                        TSS Awards Badges

                                                                        Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                                        #14

                                                                        Post by notFritzArgelander »


                                                                        TareqPhoto wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:49 pm
                                                                        Lady Fraktor wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:06 pm
                                                                        TareqPhoto wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 1:25 pm Can you judge a scope that is great amazing for narrowbanding to be used for broadbanding targets also?
                                                                        Unfortunately I cannot tell something that specific.
                                                                        I can look at a design and get an idea of how it should operate in general, this is why I have commented about the Askar as one to possibly take off of the list.
                                                                        Funny thing is that in another forum or site and also on Facebook groups, Askar got high votes, so that means it is really a nice scope, even some pointed that they had issue or CA with Sharpstar 61 scope, so the new scope won and a scope that is out for a while didn't meet full expectation much, i won't get blind about it then.
                                                                        I think you are relying WAY too much on random reviews and votes by "who knows who?" rather than expert advice. The Takahashi and Vixen scopes mentioned up thread are examples how I would go as recommended. Also the title of the thread "design or optical quality" is problematic. You focus on the number of elements and glass types and TOTALLY neglect vitally important factors like the smoothness of the optical surface polish and scratch/dig specifications not to mention the design of the baffling system. Scattered light control is an important issue. So whether the design is well executed or not is going to be important. Vixen and Takahashi are well executed. I've looked through examples of both. I have no knowledge of Askar and could care less what a social media advertising campaign says.

                                                                        But then, I know nothing. I'm just a retired physicist with a strong optics background who has built some optics and used some awfully fine examples. Go with the social media votes if you like. I hope that it works out for you.
                                                                        Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
                                                                        User avatar
                                                                        TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                                                                        Mars Ambassador
                                                                        Articles: 0
                                                                        Offline
                                                                        Posts: 135
                                                                        Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                                                                        4
                                                                        Location: UAE
                                                                        Status:
                                                                        Offline

                                                                        Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                                        #15

                                                                        Post by TareqPhoto »


                                                                        notFritzArgelander wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 10:11 pm
                                                                        TareqPhoto wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:49 pm
                                                                        Lady Fraktor wrote: Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:06 pm

                                                                        Unfortunately I cannot tell something that specific.
                                                                        I can look at a design and get an idea of how it should operate in general, this is why I have commented about the Askar as one to possibly take off of the list.
                                                                        Funny thing is that in another forum or site and also on Facebook groups, Askar got high votes, so that means it is really a nice scope, even some pointed that they had issue or CA with Sharpstar 61 scope, so the new scope won and a scope that is out for a while didn't meet full expectation much, i won't get blind about it then.
                                                                        I think you are relying WAY too much on random reviews and votes by "who knows who?" rather than expert advice. The Takahashi and Vixen scopes mentioned up thread are examples how I would go as recommended. Also the title of the thread "design or optical quality" is problematic. You focus on the number of elements and glass types and TOTALLY neglect vitally important factors like the smoothness of the optical surface polish and scratch/dig specifications not to mention the design of the baffling system. Scattered light control is an important issue. So whether the design is well executed or not is going to be important. Vixen and Takahashi are well executed. I've looked through examples of both. I have no knowledge of Askar and could care less what a social media advertising campaign says.

                                                                        But then, I know nothing. I'm just a retired physicist with a strong optics background who has built some optics and used some awfully fine examples. Go with the social media votes if you like. I hope that it works out for you.
                                                                        Please, don't put guilt on me also, i doubt that ALL social media people are dump and less knowledgeable, there are experts also, and there are who experimented, in fact the only Takahahsi scope i can afford and mentioned with my options is what someone just said that he had for 10 years and he saw CA with it, he care less with visual, but in imaging it bothers, so i can't throw away his 10 years of experience also, and also in groups or social media i didn't see much love to this Takahashi FS-60CB, so the name Takahashi is like not a bullet proof, not all scopes by them are well made, i could be wrong or they could be wrong, same goes to Vixen, in fact the only scope from Vixen which was voted for me was Vixen VSD 100mm F/3.8, that is not far price from Takahahsi or AP high end small scopes, means it is out of my reach.

                                                                        I still can go for that Vixen FL55, didn't reject it all, but i also can't reject ALL other options just because they are new or they are popular among social media people or whatever, i have to see all options and wait and decide after enough time thinking, any scope can be good and can be bad also, i used my ST80 until now while it is still an achromatic used as a guide scope, almost 4 years and i am still holding it, so i won't buy something quick only because of the brand name reputation, because that is also fooled me and some said that it is not always the case, no need to always pay for the name although they do high quality designs, but sounds my requirement of a small wide field at 280mm-320mm range there aren't high end to choose or trust anyway, they make only for like 100mm up to 180mm, beyond that it is less demand for refractors.
                                                                          Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                                                                            Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                                                                              Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                                                                                Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                                                                  Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                                                                  User avatar
                                                                                  notFritzArgelander
                                                                                  In Memory
                                                                                  In Memory
                                                                                  Articles: 0
                                                                                  Offline
                                                                                  Posts: 14925
                                                                                  Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
                                                                                  4
                                                                                  Location: Idaho US
                                                                                  Status:
                                                                                  Offline

                                                                                  TSS Awards Badges

                                                                                  Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                                                  #16

                                                                                  Post by notFritzArgelander »


                                                                                  There are no “bulletproof” options. Takahashi and Vixen are close enough for me.
                                                                                  Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
                                                                                  User avatar
                                                                                  TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                                                                                  Mars Ambassador
                                                                                  Articles: 0
                                                                                  Offline
                                                                                  Posts: 135
                                                                                  Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                                                                                  4
                                                                                  Location: UAE
                                                                                  Status:
                                                                                  Offline

                                                                                  Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                                                  #17

                                                                                  Post by TareqPhoto »


                                                                                  notFritzArgelander wrote: Fri Jan 29, 2021 12:25 am There are no “bulletproof” options. Takahashi and Vixen are close enough for me.
                                                                                  Actually my dream scope since 2018 was Takahahsi FSQ-106, now we are in 2021 and still it is a dream i couldn't afford, so if i have to wait it then it means years are gone, i might never get it, in fact it is the scope that i keep thinking about over all options i mentioned, but because i can't afford that so i try to find another one meeting my need at low reasonable prices.
                                                                                    Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                                                                                      Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                                                                                        Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                                                                                          Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                                                                            Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                                                                            User avatar
                                                                                            Bigzmey United States of America
                                                                                            Moderator
                                                                                            Moderator
                                                                                            Articles: 8
                                                                                            Online
                                                                                            Posts: 7548
                                                                                            Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:55 pm
                                                                                            4
                                                                                            Location: San Diego, CA USA
                                                                                            Status:
                                                                                            Online

                                                                                            TSS Awards Badges

                                                                                            Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                                                            #18

                                                                                            Post by Bigzmey »


                                                                                            TareqPhoto wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:21 am Hi,

                                                                                            I want to know when buying a refractor, which is more important to have:

                                                                                            1. A triplet but with ED optics
                                                                                            2. A doublet but with Fluorite or FPL-53 optics

                                                                                            So if can't afford both or the type of scope i want can't be in both of above and only one of above, what will be the choice?

                                                                                            All scopes are well made and nice quality manufactured so no one will come to say that this build quality is better than the other one, so assume all are with excellent build quality.
                                                                                            You forgot quintuplet, surely 5 glass elements count for something. :)

                                                                                            I should say quality and design go together. If design has flows execution does not matter, and bad execution can trump a good design.

                                                                                            In selecting the right scope I would start with budget, after determining the right price range I would look at the application. For example for visual 60mm scope (and not just 60mm :)) well executed doublet is all that you need.

                                                                                            Assume is that your scope is for photography, astro or terrestrial. In this case I will be of little help, but if you ask more specific questions you will get more productive answers. But, don't buy a scope just based on a type of glass.
                                                                                            Scopes: Stellarvue: SV102ED; Celestron: 9.25" EdgeHD, 8" SCT, 150ST, Onyx 80ED; iOptron: Hankmeister 6" Mak; SW: 7" Mak; Meade: 80ST.
                                                                                            Mounts: SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; iOptron: AZMP; ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; UA: MicroStar.
                                                                                            Binos: APM: 100-90 APO; Canon: IS 15x50; Orion: Binoviewer, LG II 15x70, WV 10x50, Nikon: AE 16x50, 10x50, 8x40.
                                                                                            EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68, 62; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV.
                                                                                            Diagonals: Baader: BBHS mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: 2" prism.
                                                                                            Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S, 6-color set; Astronomik: UHC.

                                                                                            Observing: DSOs: 3106 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 2180, S110: 77). Doubles: 2382, Comets: 34, Asteroids: 255
                                                                                            User avatar
                                                                                            Lady Fraktor Slovakia
                                                                                            Co-Administrator
                                                                                            Co-Administrator
                                                                                            Articles: 0
                                                                                            Offline
                                                                                            Posts: 9860
                                                                                            Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
                                                                                            4
                                                                                            Location: Slovakia
                                                                                            Status:
                                                                                            Offline

                                                                                            Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                                                            #19

                                                                                            Post by Lady Fraktor »


                                                                                            I did a bit of reading on different refractors you listed, the Takahashi from every review I read rated it highly except for the R&P focuser.
                                                                                            It has a bit of slop that nobody could fully get rid of without replacing the focuser. Optically an excellent refractor.

                                                                                            The Askar seems to have a following but even the website says 'virtually eliminates almost all CA' wonderful marketing speak :)
                                                                                            If you are good with processing I would imagine it would not be hard to clean up the image if it is required.

                                                                                            Other than the Vixen 55mm I think you will have a hard time finding one that will fit into the focal length range you posted above.
                                                                                            See Far Sticks: Antares Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser BV 127/1200, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
                                                                                            EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, AXJ, AXD
                                                                                            Az/Alt: AYO Digi II/ Argo Navis, Stellarvue M2C/ Argo Navis
                                                                                            Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
                                                                                            Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Takahashi prism, TAL, Vixen flip mirror
                                                                                            Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss
                                                                                            The only culture I have is from yogurt
                                                                                            My day was going well until... people
                                                                                            Image
                                                                                            User avatar
                                                                                            TareqPhoto United Arab Emirates
                                                                                            Mars Ambassador
                                                                                            Articles: 0
                                                                                            Offline
                                                                                            Posts: 135
                                                                                            Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 7:58 am
                                                                                            4
                                                                                            Location: UAE
                                                                                            Status:
                                                                                            Offline

                                                                                            Re: Design or optical quality???

                                                                                            #20

                                                                                            Post by TareqPhoto »


                                                                                            Bigzmey wrote: Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:42 am
                                                                                            TareqPhoto wrote: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:21 am Hi,

                                                                                            I want to know when buying a refractor, which is more important to have:

                                                                                            1. A triplet but with ED optics
                                                                                            2. A doublet but with Fluorite or FPL-53 optics

                                                                                            So if can't afford both or the type of scope i want can't be in both of above and only one of above, what will be the choice?

                                                                                            All scopes are well made and nice quality manufactured so no one will come to say that this build quality is better than the other one, so assume all are with excellent build quality.
                                                                                            You forgot quintuplet, surely 5 glass elements count for something. :)

                                                                                            I should say quality and design go together. If design has flows execution does not matter, and bad execution can trump a good design.

                                                                                            In selecting the right scope I would start with budget, after determining the right price range I would look at the application. For example for visual 60mm scope (and not just 60mm :)) well executed doublet is all that you need.

                                                                                            Assume is that your scope is for photography, astro or terrestrial. In this case I will be of little help, but if you ask more specific questions you will get more productive answers. But, don't buy a scope just based on a type of glass.
                                                                                            It is only for astrophotography, visual is far away from my mind.

                                                                                            If i shouldn't buy the scope just based on a type of glass, then based on what exactly? Sometimes a budget is a factor, or it is a main factor.
                                                                                              Telescope: SkyWatcher: Skymax 180mm F15 Mak, StarTravel 80mm f/5 ---- Meade LX70 8" F5 Newt
                                                                                                Mount: SkyWatcher AZ-EQ6 GoTo
                                                                                                  Cameras: QHY163M, QHY5L-II-M, ZWO [ASI174MM, ASI290MM, ASI385MC, ASI120MC(damaged)], Sony A7r + Canon DSLRs + lenses [Hasselbald, Canon, Sony, Sigma, Samyang], Hasselbald H4D-60
                                                                                                    Filters: Astrodon Ha 5nm, Cyclops Optics LUX-Series RGB, Optolong NB, Baader filters [M&S Neodymium, Contrast Booster], Skywatcher UHC & OIII
                                                                                                      Software: SGPro, PixInsight, APP, APT, DeepSkyStacker, Nebulosity, SharpCap, FireCapture, PHD2, CDC, Photoshop CC
                                                                                                      Post Reply

                                                                                                      Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

                                                                                                      You need to be a member in order to post a reply

                                                                                                      Create an account

                                                                                                      Not a member? register to join our community
                                                                                                      Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
                                                                                                      It’s free and only takes a minute

                                                                                                      Register

                                                                                                      Sign in

                                                                                                      Return to “Refractor type Telescopes”