The info in forecasts?

We all started somewhere! We are a friendly bunch! Most of your questions can be posted here, but if you are interested in Astrophotography please use the new Beginner Astrophotography forum. The response time will be much better.
Post Reply
User avatar
turboscrew
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 3233
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:22 am
3
Location: Nokia, Finland
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

The info in forecasts?

#1

Post by turboscrew »


Does someone know what do the seeing indices mean in the Meteoblue forecasts?
I've seen the index 1 ranging from 1 to 5, but the index 2 has been above 2 only when the sky is fully clouded.

Now it looks like this:
Screenshot from 2021-04-10 15-31-54.png
Like in the midnight, the arc seconds is 1.00, but the seeing indices are 2 and 1.

Also, the Clear Outside forecast shows now data from 7timer.info.
What is the lifted index? And what kind of effect can that cause?
The Clear Outside forecast looks like this.
Screenshot from 2021-04-10 15-47-53.png
- Juha

Senior Embedded SW Designer
Telescope: OrionOptics XV12, Mount: CEM120, Tri-pier 360 and alternative dobson mount.
Grab 'n go: Omegon AC 102/660 on AZ-3 mount
Eyepieces: 26 mm Omegon SWAN 70°, 15 mm TV Plössl, 12.5 mm Baader Morpheus, 10 mm TV Delos, 6 mm Baader Classic Ortho, 5 mm TV DeLite, 4 mm and 3 mm TV Radians
Cameras: ZWO ASI 294MM Pro, Omegon veLOX 178C
OAG: TS-Optics TSOAG09, ZWO EFW 7 x 36 mm, ZWO filter sets: LRGB and Ha/OIII/SII
Explore Scientific HR 2" coma corrector, Meade x3 1.25" Barlow, TV PowerMate 4x 2"
Some filters (#80A, ND-96, ND-09, Astronomik UHC)
Laptop: Acer Enduro Urban N3 semi-rugged, Windows 11
LAT 61° 28' 10.9" N, Bortle 5

I don't suffer from insanity. I'm enjoying every minute of it.

Image
User avatar
GCoyote United States of America
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 2708
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 2:53 am
4
Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Status:
Offline

Re: The info in forecasts?

#2

Post by GCoyote »


Good question. At first I thought it was related to turbulence from high Jet Steam velocities but there is more to it than that.
Any metaphor will tear if stretched over too much reality.
Gary C

Celestron Astro Master 130mm f5 Newtonian GEM
Meade 114-EQ-DH f7.9 Newtonian w/ manual GEM
Bushnell 90mm f13.9 Catadioptric
Gskyer 80mm f5 Alt/Az refractor
Jason 10x50 Binoculars
Celestron 7x50 Binoculars
Svbony 2.1x42 Binoculars
(And a bunch of stuff I'm still trying to fix or find parts for.)
User avatar
Ruud
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 813
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2020 9:56 pm
4
Location: the Netherlands
Status:
Offline

Re: The info in forecasts?

#3

Post by Ruud »


Don't know, but I thought it was visual vs photographic. One would very rapid vibration on a small scale, the other more like things bobbing up and down, like boats on water. The latter does not hinder visual observation much. Both are bad for long exposure photography.

Meteblue says about seeing "The estimated seeing indexes (1 & 2) range from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) seeing conditions. These values are computed based on the integration of turbulent layers in the atmosphere." This is why I think both numbers account for the entire air column and describe a different kind of effect on the image quality.

Actually, I'm pretty sure Meteoblue respond to just about any question. I'll send them a link to this thread and ask them if they can help us.
7x50 Helios Apollo 8x42 Bresser Everest 73mm f/5.9 WO APO 4" f/5 TeleVue Genesis 6" f/10 Celestron 6SE 0.63x reducer 1.8, 2, 2.5 and 3x Barlows eyepieces from 4.5 to 34mm
User avatar
turboscrew
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 3233
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:22 am
3
Location: Nokia, Finland
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: The info in forecasts?

#4

Post by turboscrew »


Ruud wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 2:12 pm Don't know, but I thought it was visual vs photographic. One would very rapid vibration on a small scale, the other more like things bobbing up and down, like boats on water. The latter does not hinder visual observation much. Both are bad for long exposure photography.

Meteblue says about seeing "The estimated seeing indexes (1 & 2) range from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) seeing conditions. These values are computed based on the integration of turbulent layers in the atmosphere." This is why I think both numbers account for the entire air column and describe a different kind of effect on the image quality.

Actually, I'm pretty sure Meteoblue respond to just about any question. I'll send them a link to this thread and ask them if they can help us.
Good idea.
It also looks like this has been added when I wasn't looking: "Seeing 2 gives more weight to the effect of density fluctuations, and is more likely to indicate air "flickering" due to turbulence."

It's still unclear what is included in the indices.
- Juha

Senior Embedded SW Designer
Telescope: OrionOptics XV12, Mount: CEM120, Tri-pier 360 and alternative dobson mount.
Grab 'n go: Omegon AC 102/660 on AZ-3 mount
Eyepieces: 26 mm Omegon SWAN 70°, 15 mm TV Plössl, 12.5 mm Baader Morpheus, 10 mm TV Delos, 6 mm Baader Classic Ortho, 5 mm TV DeLite, 4 mm and 3 mm TV Radians
Cameras: ZWO ASI 294MM Pro, Omegon veLOX 178C
OAG: TS-Optics TSOAG09, ZWO EFW 7 x 36 mm, ZWO filter sets: LRGB and Ha/OIII/SII
Explore Scientific HR 2" coma corrector, Meade x3 1.25" Barlow, TV PowerMate 4x 2"
Some filters (#80A, ND-96, ND-09, Astronomik UHC)
Laptop: Acer Enduro Urban N3 semi-rugged, Windows 11
LAT 61° 28' 10.9" N, Bortle 5

I don't suffer from insanity. I'm enjoying every minute of it.

Image
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Beginners forum”