https://www.telescope.com/Orion/Orion-S ... 116276.uts
This, a souped-up go-to Meade LX70, incognito as an
https://www.astronomics.com/explore-sci ... drive.html
The previous EXOS-2 go-to was the first incarnation, and is currently going the way of the Dodo...
https://optcorp.com/products/explore-sc ... 2IQAvD_BwE
Incidentally, a camera's sensor is much more sensitive than the human eye. During a timed exposure, far more light is collected. But a camera will not tolerate a shaky mount. A camera must be held rigidly, like a rock, and during the length of the exposure; else, the images will blur. The human eye and brain are much more forgiving of shaky images; but a camera will have none of that.
The longer the refractor, in relation to its mount, the shakier the telescope...
https://www.astronomics.com/astro-tech- ... l?___SID=U
That one is a for a good balance between imaging and visual-use.
This one is suited for imaging even more so... https://www.astronomics.com/astro-tech- ... l?___SID=U
Again, a camera's "eye" is far more sensitive, therefore large apertures are not needed, as they are for the weak human eye.
Refractors are the easiest with which to image. Newtonians are perhaps the most difficult, but quite doable.