Orthoscopic Alternative

Discuss telescope eyepieces.
Post Reply
MrCit United States of America
Earth Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:44 pm
4
Location: Chicagoland, USA
Status:
Offline

Orthoscopic Alternative

#1

Post by MrCit »


As you can guess from my signature, my primary scope is an 8 inch f/6 dob. I started observing with this scope a couple years ago, and my first eyepiece purchases were from the Celestron X-Cel LX line. I especially like the 7 mm, and I used this eyepiece for almost all my planetary viewing (and doubles, etc. when I need high power).

At the end of last summer, I got a 6 mm Baader Classic Ortho, and it was a revelation. I love the sharpness of this eyepiece for planets. I don't really mind the narrower field of view, and I don't even mind the fact that it feels like I have to put my eyeball right on to the glass to use it. That is, I don't mind these things except for the fact that: 1. I tend to get the eyepiece dirty with the oils from my eyelashes, and 2. on cooler nights (or mornings, as the case may be), putting my eye so close to the eyepiece causes the eyepiece to fog up pretty quickly.

So my question is, what would you recommend that has the performance of an ortho, but offers more eye relief? Am I on the right track thinking that the Tele Vue Delos might fit the bill for someone with semi-inifinte funds (which I don't have, but let us dream...)? Other contenders?

Thanks for your thoughts!
Telescopes: Orion Skyline 8 in. dob, Celestron Nexstar 6SE, Explore Scientific AR102 on Twilight I, Celestron 90GT 90 mm f/10 refractor, ST80 (Meade Adventure).
Eyepieces: ES 82° 30 mm, 18 mm; Celestron X-Cel LX 12 mm, 9 mm, 7 mm, 5 mm, Baader Classic Ortho 6 mm.
User avatar
Lady Fraktor Slovakia
Universal Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 9961
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:14 pm
4
Location: Slovakia
Status:
Offline

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#2

Post by Lady Fraktor »


The Vixen SLV are nice eyepieces as well.
50° AFOV but with 20mm eye relief.
https://www.vixenoptics.com/category-s/159.htm
Gabrielle
See Far Sticks: Elita 103/1575, AOM FLT 105/1000, Bresser 127/1200 BV, Nočný stopár 152/1200, Vyrobené doma 70/700, Stellarvue NHNG DX 80/552, TAL RS 100/1000, Vixen SD115s/885
EQ: TAL MT-1, Vixen SXP, SXP2, AXJ, AXD
Az/Alt: AYO Digi II, Stellarvue M2C, Argo Navis encoders on both
Tripods: Berlebach Planet (2), Uni 28 Astro, Report 372, TAL factory maple, Vixen ASG-CB90, Vixen AXD-TR102
Diagonals: Astro-Physics, Baader Amici, Baader Herschel, iStar Blue, Stellarvue DX, Tak prism, TAL, Vixen
Eyepieces: Antares to Zeiss (1011110)
The only culture I have is from yogurt
Image
User avatar
notFritzArgelander
In Memory
In Memory
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 14925
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 4:13 pm
4
Location: Idaho US
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#3

Post by notFritzArgelander »


I've directly compared my TV Delos against BCO and KK Fujiyama orthoscopic eyepieces.

There is a very slight degradation of contrast in the Delos. I notice the difference mostly in observing shadow transits on Jupiter. The shadow is minutely less contrasty in the Delos. This is on a hard contrast object.

On soft contrast details, like internal wisps and nebular filaments the BCOs are more clearly better.
Scopes: Refs: Orion ST80, SV 80EDA f7, TS 102ED f11 Newts: AWB 130mm, f5, Z12 f5; Cats: VMC110L, Intes MK66,VMC200L f9.75 EPs: KK Fujiyama Orthoscopics, 2x Vixen NPLs (40-6mm) and BCOs, Baader Mark IV zooms, TV Panoptics, Delos, Plossl 32-8mm. Mixed brand Masuyama/Astroplans Binoculars: Nikon Aculon 10x50, Celestron 15x70, Baader Maxbright. Mounts: Star Seeker IV, Vixen Porta II, Celestron CG5
User avatar
Bigzmey United States of America
Moderator
Moderator
Articles: 8
Offline
Posts: 7643
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:55 pm
4
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#4

Post by Bigzmey »


Lady Fraktor wrote: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:47 pm The Vixen SLV are nice eyepieces as well.
50° AFOV but with 20mm eye relief.
https://www.vixenoptics.com/category-s/159.htm
Yes! SLVs have ortho-like performance with 20mm eye relief, very comfortable to observe. I compared them side by side to BCOs on many occasions and in terms of contrast, sharpness and light scatter they are neck to neck. BCOs may still have slight advantage on very faint nebulae, but for double splitting, lunar and planets I don't bring orthos any longer and go with SLVs.

They go on sale at least once a year for ~$100 a piece. I also picked a few used for less than that on Astromart and CN.
Scopes: Stellarvue: SV102ED; Celestron: 9.25" EdgeHD, 8" SCT, 150ST, Onyx 80ED; iOptron: Hankmeister 6" Mak; SW: 7" Mak; Meade: 80ST.
Mounts: SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; iOptron: AZMP; ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; UA: MicroStar.
Binos: APM: 100-90 APO; Canon: IS 15x50; Orion: Binoviewer, LG II 15x70, WV 10x50, Nikon: AE 16x50, 10x50, 8x40.
EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68, 62; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV.
Diagonals: Baader: BBHS mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: 2" prism.
Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S, 6-color set; Astronomik: UHC.

Observing: DSOs: 3106 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 2180, S110: 77). Doubles: 2437, Comets: 34, Asteroids: 257
User avatar
Bigzmey United States of America
Moderator
Moderator
Articles: 8
Offline
Posts: 7643
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:55 pm
4
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#5

Post by Bigzmey »


notFritzArgelander wrote: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:53 pm I've directly compared my TV Delos against BCO and KK Fujiyama orthoscopic eyepieces.

There is a very slight degradation of contrast in the Delos. I notice the difference mostly in observing shadow transits on Jupiter. The shadow is minutely less contrasty in the Delos. This is on a hard contrast object.

On soft contrast details, like internal wisps and nebular filaments the BCOs are more clearly better.
I have compared BCOs to Delites. Pretty much neck to neck on Moon and planets. Again, BCOs may have slight advantage on extra faint targets, but I need to do more comparison.

The only EP which actually had an edge over 10mm BCO on faint targets is Pentax XW 10mm. :D
Scopes: Stellarvue: SV102ED; Celestron: 9.25" EdgeHD, 8" SCT, 150ST, Onyx 80ED; iOptron: Hankmeister 6" Mak; SW: 7" Mak; Meade: 80ST.
Mounts: SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; iOptron: AZMP; ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; UA: MicroStar.
Binos: APM: 100-90 APO; Canon: IS 15x50; Orion: Binoviewer, LG II 15x70, WV 10x50, Nikon: AE 16x50, 10x50, 8x40.
EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68, 62; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV.
Diagonals: Baader: BBHS mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: 2" prism.
Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S, 6-color set; Astronomik: UHC.

Observing: DSOs: 3106 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 2180, S110: 77). Doubles: 2437, Comets: 34, Asteroids: 257
User avatar
Ruud
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 813
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2020 9:56 pm
4
Location: the Netherlands
Status:
Offline

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#6

Post by Ruud »


TeleVue DeLite, 3mm and up, 62°, 20 mm eye relief, $255

Delite (and Delos too) have excellent optics and ergonomics.
7x50 Helios Apollo 8x42 Bresser Everest 73mm f/5.9 WO APO 4" f/5 TeleVue Genesis 6" f/10 Celestron 6SE 0.63x reducer 1.8, 2, 2.5 and 3x Barlows eyepieces from 4.5 to 34mm
User avatar
John Baars Netherlands
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 5
Offline
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 9:00 am
4
Location: Schiedam, Netherlands
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#7

Post by John Baars »


I am familiar with the problems as my best planetary eyepiece has the same problem.
Since no eyepiece has the same excellent viewing properties as the one, I decided to accept the shortcomings.
To avoid them, I observe at a greater eye distance and take the even smaller field of view for granted. After all, all I have to do is see the planet. The eyepiece is no longer getting greasy and dewy. I do exclude outside light by means of a hood, so that I have to keep my eye even further away to prevent dew by my breath.
One way or another, it remains a Spartan eyepiece.. :) But the views are great!
Refractors in frequency of use : *SW Evostar 120ED F/7.5 (all round ), * Vixen 102ED F/9 (vintage), both on Vixen GPDX.
GrabnGo on Alt/AZ : *SW Startravel 102 F/5 refractor( widefield, Sun, push-to), *OMC140 Maksutov F/14.3 ( planets).
Most used Eyepieces: *Panoptic 24, *Morpheus 14, *Leica ASPH zoom, *Zeiss barlow, *Pentax XO5.
Commonly used bino's : *Jena 10X50 , * Canon 10X30 IS, *Swarovski Habicht 7X42, * Celestron 15X70, *Kasai 2.3X40
Rijswijk Public Observatory: * Astro-Physics Starfire 130 f/8, * 6 inch Newton, * C9.25, * Meade 14 inch LX600 ACF, *Lunt.
Amateur astronomer since 1970.
User avatar
j.gardavsky Germany
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:52 pm
4
Location: Germany
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#8

Post by j.gardavsky »


The problem with the BCOs is their minimum mass, and hence their rapid cool down, causing the fogging.

Check out the tube on the focuser in which the EP is inserted. In another situation - on my RACI - I have made a wrap with an isolating material around the EP holder, and it slows the cool down and helpss against fogging. Otherwise, the RACI EP has been fogged within 20 minutes.

What would also help is a sort of rubber armour on the flat top around the eye lens on the EP.
This has been perfectly well understood by Pentax, and the old Pentax SMC Abbe Orthos have this thin rubber armour on their tops.

Somehow, the other designers did not get it that the astronomy equipment is used during the night hours and that a not protected telescope with its accessories is radiating heat like mad into the Universe.
It's not enough to learn just the optics, some thermomechanics can be also useful,

JG
6" F/5 Sky-Watcher achro, 2" BBHS Star Diagonal, 2" zenith prism, 1.25" Takahashi prism
Leica 82mm APO Televid
Eyepieces: Docter UWA; Leica B WW and WW Asph. Zoom; Leica HC Plan S and L, monocentric; Pentax SMC XW, O-, XO; Tak MC O, Carl Zeiss B WW, and Pl, E-Pl, S-Pl, W-Pl;
Swarovski SW; Baader Symmetric Diascope Edition; Nikon NAV SW, ; TMB supermonocentric; Rodenstock; Vixen HR; TV Delos
Filters: Astrodon, Astronomik, Baader, Balzers, Zeiss West and East, Lumicon
Binoculars (7x42 up to 15x85): Docter Nobilem, Leica Ultravid, Nikon Astroluxe, Swarovski EL Swarovision; BA8 (Kunming Optical)
User avatar
pakarinen United States of America
Inter-Galactic Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 4027
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 3:33 pm
4
Location: NE Illinois
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Orthoscopic Alternative

#9

Post by pakarinen »


Lady Fraktor wrote: Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:47 pm The Vixen SLV are nice eyepieces as well.
50° AFOV but with 20mm eye relief.
https://www.vixenoptics.com/category-s/159.htm
I've bought two (on sale no less) based on LF's recommendation. I'm not an EP expert, but they are very good EPs IMO.
=============================================================================
I drink tea, I read books, I look at stars when I'm not cursing clouds. It's what I do.
=============================================================================
AT50, AT72EDII, ST80, ST102; Scopetech Zero, AZ-GTi, AZ Pronto; Innorel RT90C, Oberwerk 5000; Orion Giantview 15x70s, Vortex 8x42s, Navy surplus 7x50s, Nikon 10x50s
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Eyepieces”