I am a beginner at
I read that conventional wisdom definitely points to Astro modding a
What I read is on a website br Dr. Roger Clark (clarkvision.com).
Dr Clark has a very impressive resume.
Dr. Clark states below:
“The advantage of a stock digital camera in astrophotography is that the color balance is close to that of the human eye, and shows compositional differences better. Modified digital cameras are too sensitive to hydrogen alpha emission, making scenes containing hydrogen too red, swamping colors from other compositions. Often this shows in amateur astrophotos as dominantly red. The choice of course is personal. I prefer images with more colors to show more processes and chemistry. I believe such images are more interesting, so I only use stock digital cameras for my astrophotography.”
I admit that I haven’t completely read all of the information on his website, so there might be things that I have not read yet. The website has lots and f interesting information.
Have any of you looked at clarkvision.com?
I guess that is it really a personal thing, but any thoughts about this way of thinking?
Thanks for any comments that you have.
Jim