Is this vignetting?

Discuss how you are able to get those fantastic images!!!
User avatar
Larry 1969 United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:33 am
4
Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Is this vignetting?

#21

Post by Larry 1969 »


Nope... That wasn't it... :x

Larry
For visual:
10" Skywatcher collapsible goto dob, various EP's and a Celestron StarSense auto align.

For imaging:
Orion 8" astrograph 800mm @ F3.9
Eq6-R Pro controlled by APT via EQmod with an OTA mounted mini PC
Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 coma corrector
Altair Hypercam 26C
Image
User avatar
UlteriorModem
Local Group Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 2112
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 1:32 am
4
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Is this vignetting?

#22

Post by UlteriorModem »


That will probably do it ;)

Here is my pass at just the single frame completely un-calibrated. There is a good deal of vigenetting in the data made worse by the high levels of sky glow. Neither of which you can do much about. A good set of calibration files will help with that though.

ImageL_0090_ISO800_180s__56F by Tom Whit, on Flickr
Tom

Current Equipment:
Mount: Celestron CGX-L
Scope: 130mm f7 APO
Cam: ASI071mc-pro
User avatar
startoolsastro
Moon Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:38 am
4
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline

Re: Is this vignetting?

#23

Post by startoolsastro »


Hi,

The issue is most likely failure to remove stacking artifacts. In the image you posted I can see a one pixel high stacking artifact at the top and at the bottom, as well as a one pixel wide stacking artifact to the left and to the right.

For some reason, DSS' intersect mode almost works, but fails to properly crop by just one pixel to the top, bottom, left and right. It's a long standing bug...

If stacking artifacts are not removed not removed (cropped), Wipe will, in turn detect the darker-than-real-background artefacts and will then locally back off, as it doesn't want to clip your signal by subtracting the bias/gradients it found from it. Wipe is - by design - very careful.

From the docs;
Preparing data for the Wipe module
Image
^ Leaving stacking artifacts in will cause Wipe to interpret the anomalous data as true background, causing it to back off near the location of the artifacts.

It is of the utmost importance that Wipe is given the best artefact-free, linear data you can muster.

Because Wipe tries to find the true (darkest) background level, any pixel reading that is mistakenly darker than the true background in your image (for example due to dead pixels on the CCD, or a dust speck on the sensor) will cause Wipe to acquire wrong readings for the background. When this happens, Wipe can be seen to "back off" around the area where the anomalous data was detected, resulting in localised patches where gradient (or light pollution) remnants remain. These can often look like halos. Often dark anomalous data can be found at the very centre of such a halo or remnant.

The reason Wipe backs off is that Wipe (as is the case with most modules in StarTools) refuses to clip your data. Instead Wipe allocates the dynamic range that the dark anomaly needs to display its 'features'. Of course, we don't care about the 'features' of an anomaly and would be happy for Wipe to clip the anomaly if it means the rest of the image will look correct.

Fortunately, there are various ways to help Wipe avoid anomalous data;
  • A 'Dark anomaly filter' parameter can be set to filter out smaller dark anomalies, such as dead pixels or small clusters of dead pixels, before passing on the image to Wipe for analysis.
  • Larger dark anomalies (such as dust specks on the sensor) can be excluded from analysis by, simply by creating a mask that excludes that particular area (for example by "drawing" a "gap" in the mask using the Lassoo tool in the Mask editor).
  • Stacking artefacts can be cropped using the Crop module.
Ivo Jager - creator of StarTools
User avatar
Larry 1969 United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:33 am
4
Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Is this vignetting?

#24

Post by Larry 1969 »


Thanks Ivo!
I think I understand. My first step is AutoDev then Bin 50%.
I guess crop should be my next step instead of wipe.
I will reprocess this and report back.

Larry
For visual:
10" Skywatcher collapsible goto dob, various EP's and a Celestron StarSense auto align.

For imaging:
Orion 8" astrograph 800mm @ F3.9
Eq6-R Pro controlled by APT via EQmod with an OTA mounted mini PC
Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 coma corrector
Altair Hypercam 26C
Image
User avatar
Juno16 United States of America
Universal Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 8210
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 3:13 pm
4
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Is this vignetting?

#25

Post by Juno16 »


Hi Larry,

Let us know how that works out. I always use Intersection stacking in dss and only see the usual “fringe” stacking artifacts mostly caused by the meridian flip.
Jim

Scopes: Explore Scientific ED102 APO, Sharpstar 61 EDPH II APO, Samyang 135 F2 (still on the Nikon).
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro with Rowan Belt Mod
Stuff: ASI EAF Focus Motor (x2), ZWO OAG, ZWO 30 mm Guide Scope, ASI 220mm min, ASI 120mm mini, Stellarview 0.8 FR/FF, Sharpstar 0.8 FR/FF, Mele Overloock 3C.
Camera/Filters/Software: ASI 533 mc pro, ASI 120mm mini, ASI 220mm mini , IDAS LPS D-1, Optolong L-Enhance, ZWO UV/IR Cut, N.I.N.A., Green Swamp Server, PHD2, Adobe Photoshop CC, Pixinsight.
Dog and best bud: Jack
Sky: Bortle 6-7
My Astrobin: https://www.astrobin.com/users/Juno16/
User avatar
Larry 1969 United States of America
Milky Way Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:33 am
4
Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Status:
Offline

TSS Photo of the Day

Re: Is this vignetting?

#26

Post by Larry 1969 »


Ivo's solution worked!
I was confused with the processing process. I was using the wipe module to bring out the stacking errors then cropping... :oops:
I have a better understanding now. Thanks for all the help and patience!

Larry
For visual:
10" Skywatcher collapsible goto dob, various EP's and a Celestron StarSense auto align.

For imaging:
Orion 8" astrograph 800mm @ F3.9
Eq6-R Pro controlled by APT via EQmod with an OTA mounted mini PC
Tele Vue Paracorr Type 2 coma corrector
Altair Hypercam 26C
Image
User avatar
Star Dad United States of America
Orion Spur Ambassador
Articles: 0
Offline
Posts: 744
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 8:05 pm
4
Location: Norwich CT
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Is this vignetting?

#27

Post by Star Dad »


Many times I find going simply to wipe will reveal that large "light border area". Even after I have cropped the image. I finally decided that the best method was to autodev then wipe. See where the light border stands out and cancel the wipe, and then go back and re-crop the image. repeat until that light border are is gone. Usually a simply eyeball approach is all it takes. Hopefully the object you are photographing is in the middle with plenty of space around it to crop. Lately, because my town recently installed 5,000K led street lights I can no longer use a gradient but have to use the Vignetting in Wipe with the dark filter set to 2 pixels. Good luck!
"To be good is not enough when you dream of being great"

Orion 203mm/f4.9/1000mm, converted TASCO 114mm/f9/1000mm to steam punk, Meade 114mm/f9/1000, Coronado PST, Orion EQ-G, Ioptron Mini-Tower and iEQ30, Canon 70D, ASI120MM,ASI294MC, Ioptron SkyHunter
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Image processing”