So I actually think this was from my stacking process! Thank god.
I ran a different set of images through
DSS, instead of using lightvortexastronomy.com's pixinsight stacking process, and I got WAY better results.
I know it's a different target, but it's shot at same settings, ISO, and same night, but with less integration time:
I know it's still very noisy, but it's way better as far as the weird chrominance-like noise in the m31 stack above. All I did to this image was dynamic crop, DBE, background neutralization, and color calibration. It came out way better.
Has anyone who has used light vortex process had this problem? I'm going to try running m31 through
DSS to make sure I get the same result.
-James W.
Telescope: Explore Scientific 80mm FCD100 Triplet APO Refractor
Mount: EQ6-R Pro
Cameras: ZWO ASI1600mm Pro (Cooled) |
Canon DSLR EOS T7i
Auto-guiding: ZWO ASI120mm-Mini +
Astromania 50mm Guidescope
Filters: ZWO 31mm Ha/Oiii/Sii 7nm + LRGB | Orion 2" Skyglow Filter
Accessories: Explore Scientific 2" Field Flattener, ZWO EFW 8 Position
Software: APT, SharpCap Pro, PHD2, CPWI | PixInsight, DeepSkyStacker, Photoshop
Flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/gp/186194203@N06/18B629