Take a look at this image, which I think is one of the best of the target I'm working on. I have data that's pretty similar to this when I look at the mono images and my O3 data IMO is significantly better. Yet when I put it all together, I don't get that beautiful combination he gets, and in particular, check out the texture of the
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1610/S ... singer.jpg
Here's where I'm at and I still need to work a bit more on this (the O3 is actually the old data at half the drizzled resolution since I've not finished processing it at this resolution yet) but hopefully you can see my attempts at getting the texture and lighting:
My mono images DO look better (texture, etc. which is either very similar or some other choices I've made I'm happy with). But my colour images don't retain that same texture, which looks flat and not like a painting. On top of it I think this image does some tricks to get a 3D like effect but I can't be sure so I can try some of that but still, the texture is missing (or maybe it is due to the 3D effect - I have to try this out - this is basically like using your data to create like a topographic/relief map so perhaps that's what is adding that texture).
Hmm. I am blind in one eye, I wonder if that makes a difference. My daughter said that what I look at as raised she sees as depressed.
--Ram