Exploradome retention modification
- KathyNS
- Co-Administrator
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 11:47 am
- 5
- Location: Nova Scotia
- Status:
Online
-
TSS Photo of the Day
TSS Awards Badges
Exploradome retention modification
My Exploradome came with plastic ring segments that go under the dome skirt to keep the dome from lifting in strong winds. The dome is actually quite aerodynamically stable, as well as being heavy, so I have seen no tendency for it to lift. However, given the value of the equipment it is protecting, a retention system is a good idea.
This photo shows one of the retention ring segments lying on the roof below the dome skirt. The retention ring is about 2" wide. Because of the poor fit of the roof panels, there is only 1" clearance between the done skirt and the upturned inner edge of the roof panel. There was a lot of bending and rubbing, and the ends of the ring segments would catch on the corners of the roof panels in places.
As long as I was using the big geared DC motor supplied by Exploradome for rotation, there was unlimited torque available, and the motor was able to force the dome around anyway. However, when I switched to a stepper motor for rotation, the available torque was much less. I had to remove the retention ring to reduce drag.
Keeping the dome on in storms has never been a problem. I had installed removable tie-down turnbuckles that have successfully held the dome on through hurricanes. But they have to be removed before [flight] using the dome, so I was always concerned about a wind coming up while the dome was open. (The yellow cord attached to the bottom of the turnbuckle tethers a shorting plug, which, when inserted into the rotation controller, tells it to refuse all rotation commands.)
I considered modifying the original retention rings by cutting them down. However, that would have taken a lot of fiddly work with jigs and a jigsaw, plus they are a pain in the butt to install.
My solution was to install aluminum brackets on the inside of the observatory. They are attached to the roof framing, and have a 90-degree bend at the top that goes over the ring gear. I would have been happier if I could have made the overlap at the ring gear larger, but the radius of the dome varies by several inches, and there isn't room for anything that extends past the ring gear itself.
The brackets will hold the ring down. The dome itself has to be secured to the ring in order to prevent it flying off. I had always had a couple of screws holding the dome to the ring, just to prevent it rotating relative to the ring. I added six more, for a total of eight, to actually provide some significant hold-down force in the event that it tries to lift. Because there is no access to the underside of the ring to install nuts onto bolts, I used self-tapping screws into pre-drilled holes.
This modification gives me peace of mind when a wind comes up while I am doing unattended imaging.
This photo shows one of the retention ring segments lying on the roof below the dome skirt. The retention ring is about 2" wide. Because of the poor fit of the roof panels, there is only 1" clearance between the done skirt and the upturned inner edge of the roof panel. There was a lot of bending and rubbing, and the ends of the ring segments would catch on the corners of the roof panels in places.
As long as I was using the big geared DC motor supplied by Exploradome for rotation, there was unlimited torque available, and the motor was able to force the dome around anyway. However, when I switched to a stepper motor for rotation, the available torque was much less. I had to remove the retention ring to reduce drag.
Keeping the dome on in storms has never been a problem. I had installed removable tie-down turnbuckles that have successfully held the dome on through hurricanes. But they have to be removed before [flight] using the dome, so I was always concerned about a wind coming up while the dome was open. (The yellow cord attached to the bottom of the turnbuckle tethers a shorting plug, which, when inserted into the rotation controller, tells it to refuse all rotation commands.)
I considered modifying the original retention rings by cutting them down. However, that would have taken a lot of fiddly work with jigs and a jigsaw, plus they are a pain in the butt to install.
My solution was to install aluminum brackets on the inside of the observatory. They are attached to the roof framing, and have a 90-degree bend at the top that goes over the ring gear. I would have been happier if I could have made the overlap at the ring gear larger, but the radius of the dome varies by several inches, and there isn't room for anything that extends past the ring gear itself.
The brackets will hold the ring down. The dome itself has to be secured to the ring in order to prevent it flying off. I had always had a couple of screws holding the dome to the ring, just to prevent it rotating relative to the ring. I added six more, for a total of eight, to actually provide some significant hold-down force in the event that it tries to lift. Because there is no access to the underside of the ring to install nuts onto bolts, I used self-tapping screws into pre-drilled holes.
This modification gives me peace of mind when a wind comes up while I am doing unattended imaging.
DSO AP: Orion 200mm f/4 Newtonian Astrograph; ATIK 383L+; EFW2 filter wheel; Astrodon Ha,Oiii,LRGB filters; KWIQ/QHY5 guide scope; Planetary AP: Celestron C-11; ZWO ASI120MC; Portable: Celestron C-8 on HEQ5 pro; C-90 on wedge; 20x80 binos; Etc: Canon 350D; Various EPs, etc. Obs: 8' Exploradome; iOptron CEM60 (pier); Helena Observatory (H2O) Astrobin
- UlteriorModem
- Local Group Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 1:32 am
- 4
- Location: Florida
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Exploradome retention modification
Well done.
If the wind got high enough to lift the lid it's probably not the best of conditions for imagingwhen a wind comes up while I am doing unattended imaging
Tom
Current Equipment:
Mount: Celestron CGX-L
Scope: 130mm f7 APO
Cam: ASI071mc-pro
Current Equipment:
Mount: Celestron CGX-L
Scope: 130mm f7 APO
Cam: ASI071mc-pro
- KathyNS
- Co-Administrator
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 11:47 am
- 5
- Location: Nova Scotia
- Status:
Online
-
TSS Photo of the Day
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Exploradome retention modification
Probably not. But, living on the coast, I don't always know that before I go to sleep. I'm a belt-and-suspenders (braces, for Brits) kind of gal. We get so few clear nights that I want to be less picky about when I can take advantage of one.UlteriorModem wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:41 pm Well done.
If the wind got high enough to lift the lid it's probably not the best of conditions for imagingwhen a wind comes up while I am doing unattended imaging
A lighter wind, that doesn't impair imaging too much, can include the odd gust. I'd be worried that a gust from the wrong direction could blow into the open slot, pressurize the interior, and cause some lift. I wouldn't expect the dome to fly into the next county, but I don't even want it shifting six inches and opening up a gap.
DSO AP: Orion 200mm f/4 Newtonian Astrograph; ATIK 383L+; EFW2 filter wheel; Astrodon Ha,Oiii,LRGB filters; KWIQ/QHY5 guide scope; Planetary AP: Celestron C-11; ZWO ASI120MC; Portable: Celestron C-8 on HEQ5 pro; C-90 on wedge; 20x80 binos; Etc: Canon 350D; Various EPs, etc. Obs: 8' Exploradome; iOptron CEM60 (pier); Helena Observatory (H2O) Astrobin
- John Fitzgerald
- Jupiter Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:04 am
- 4
- Location: Arkansas
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Exploradome retention modification
Kathy,
Since you have had the ExploraDome, have you encountered those who think it's a hot tub enclosure? Lots of people around here seem to think that about mine, and I just let them think it, neither confirming or denying. No sense borrowing possible problems. In the winter, the dome is visible from the road a couple hundred feet away.
Since you have had the ExploraDome, have you encountered those who think it's a hot tub enclosure? Lots of people around here seem to think that about mine, and I just let them think it, neither confirming or denying. No sense borrowing possible problems. In the winter, the dome is visible from the road a couple hundred feet away.
Double and multiple star observer. Over 3,500 unique pairs logged.
No good deed goes unpunished.
No good deed goes unpunished.
- KathyNS
- Co-Administrator
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 11:47 am
- 5
- Location: Nova Scotia
- Status:
Online
-
TSS Photo of the Day
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Exploradome retention modification
Can't say as I've had anyone suggest that! Mine is pretty well hidden even from the driveway. It is totally invisible from the road.
DSO AP: Orion 200mm f/4 Newtonian Astrograph; ATIK 383L+; EFW2 filter wheel; Astrodon Ha,Oiii,LRGB filters; KWIQ/QHY5 guide scope; Planetary AP: Celestron C-11; ZWO ASI120MC; Portable: Celestron C-8 on HEQ5 pro; C-90 on wedge; 20x80 binos; Etc: Canon 350D; Various EPs, etc. Obs: 8' Exploradome; iOptron CEM60 (pier); Helena Observatory (H2O) Astrobin
- John Fitzgerald
- Jupiter Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:04 am
- 4
- Location: Arkansas
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Exploradome retention modification
Maybe hot tubs are much more popular around here. Most people seem to be unaware of observatories.
Double and multiple star observer. Over 3,500 unique pairs logged.
No good deed goes unpunished.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute