Geometrical optics and focuser
- turboscrew
- Milky Way Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:22 am
- Location: Nokia, Finland
Geometrical optics and focuser
What's the role of the focuser?
I've been playing with geometrical optics of two lens system, and it looks like the image is always formed, either true or false - except when the object to a lens is at its focal point.
Is it because of the eye, or because of other properties not described by geometrical optics?
And why should the focal lengths of the objective and eyepiece overlap (false image)?
I've been playing with geometrical optics of two lens system, and it looks like the image is always formed, either true or false - except when the object to a lens is at its focal point.
Is it because of the eye, or because of other properties not described by geometrical optics?
And why should the focal lengths of the objective and eyepiece overlap (false image)?
- Bigzmey
- Inter-Galactic Ambassador
- Articles: 5
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:55 pm
- 1
- Location: San Diego, CA USA
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: Geometrical optics and focuser
Yes, image is formed by telescope objective in the focal plane. The role of EP is to magnify this image. Since EPs have different focal lengths you need focuser to converge the focal planes of EP and telescope objective. Any time you add additional elements to the optical train (observe eye, diagonal, barlow, etc.) you need to do further adjustments.
Scopes: Stellarvue: SV102 ED F7; Celestron: 9.25" EdgeHD F10, 8" SCT F10, 6" SCT F10, Omni XLT 150R Achro F5, Onyx 80ED F6.3; Meade: 80ST Achro F5.
Mounts: ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; UA: MicroStar.
Binos: Orion: Little Giant II 15x70, WorldView 10x50, Nikon: Action EX 16x50 & 8x40.
EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68s; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV; Russell Optics: SuperPlossls.
Diagonals: Baader: BBHS silver mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: Positive lock prism.
Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S; Astronomik: UHC, Orion: UltraBlock, SkyGlow.
Observing: DSOs: 2106 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 1635, S110: 77). Doubles: 1441, Comets: 18, Asteroids: 95
Mounts: ES: Twilight I; Bresser: EXOS2; SW: SkyTee2, AzGTi; UA: MicroStar.
Binos: Orion: Little Giant II 15x70, WorldView 10x50, Nikon: Action EX 16x50 & 8x40.
EPs: Pentax: XWs & XFs; TeleVue: Delites, Panoptic & Plossls; ES: 68s; Vixen: SLVs; Baader: BCOs, Aspherics, Mark IV; Russell Optics: SuperPlossls.
Diagonals: Baader: BBHS silver mirror, Zeiss Spec T2 prism, Clicklock dielectric; TeleVue: Evebrite dielectric; AltairAstro: Positive lock prism.
Filters: Lumicon: DeepSky, UHC, OIII, H-beta; Baader: Moon & SkyGlow, Contrast Booster, UHC-S; Astronomik: UHC, Orion: UltraBlock, SkyGlow.
Observing: DSOs: 2106 (Completed: Messier, Herschel 1, 2, 3. In progress: H2,500: 1635, S110: 77). Doubles: 1441, Comets: 18, Asteroids: 95
- SkyHiker
- Orion Spur Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 8:40 pm
- 1
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Geometrical optics and focuser
A single lens will form an image but with convergent rays towards the focal point and divergent from there on. In order for the human eye to see an image, the light rays must come in approximately parallel. That's why you need a second lens, the eyepiece. It will make the divergent rays parallel tuned by your hand turning the focuser.
... Henk.
Telescopes: 6" Mak-Newt (Comet Hunter), ES ED127CF, ES ED80, Zhumell Z12, AT6RC, Venture RX-7, Celestron Skymaster 20x80, Mounts and tripod: Losmandy G11S with DIY OnStep, AVX, LXD55, Tiltall, Cameras: Fuji X-a1, Canon SX40, Xt, XSi, T6, ELPH 100HS, DIY: OnStep controller, Barndoor trackers for 10" Dob and camera, Afocal adapter, Foldable Dob base, Az/Alt Dob setting circles, Accessories: TV Paracorr 2, Baader MPCC Mk III, ES FF, SSAG, Plossls, Barlows, Telrad, Laser collimators (Seben LK1, Z12, Howie Glatter), Cheshire, 2 Orion RACIs 8x50, Software: KStars-Ekos, DSS, PHD2, Nebulosity, Photo Gallery, Gimp, CHDK

- turboscrew
- Milky Way Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:22 am
- Location: Nokia, Finland
Re: Geometrical optics and focuser
I've read that the focal lengths have to overlap a bit. if the object of second lens is exactly in its focal point, there is no image, true or false. If the object is outside of the focal point, the image is true, an if it's inside of the focal point, the image is false. And since the image of the objective forms at its focal plane (its object in optical infinity)...
Also the angle that a lens "bends" the beam doesn't depend on the distance.
But I guess, it has to do with the eye: whether or not the image forms on the retina, in front of it, or behind it?
To get it, I should study 3 lens systems with true final images?
Also the angle that a lens "bends" the beam doesn't depend on the distance.
But I guess, it has to do with the eye: whether or not the image forms on the retina, in front of it, or behind it?
To get it, I should study 3 lens systems with true final images?
- SkyHiker
- Orion Spur Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 8:40 pm
- 1
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Geometrical optics and focuser
Yes.turboscrew wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:56 am But I guess, it has to do with the eye: whether or not the image forms on the retina, in front of it, or behind it?
No because the shape of the human eye leads to a nearly fixed focus lens. For comfortable viewing the rays must come in parallel. They may diverge a bit but then the eye's lens must work to focus. So just assume parallel. Then there's not that much to study really.turboscrew wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:56 am To get it, I should study 3 lens systems with true final images?
... Henk.
Telescopes: 6" Mak-Newt (Comet Hunter), ES ED127CF, ES ED80, Zhumell Z12, AT6RC, Venture RX-7, Celestron Skymaster 20x80, Mounts and tripod: Losmandy G11S with DIY OnStep, AVX, LXD55, Tiltall, Cameras: Fuji X-a1, Canon SX40, Xt, XSi, T6, ELPH 100HS, DIY: OnStep controller, Barndoor trackers for 10" Dob and camera, Afocal adapter, Foldable Dob base, Az/Alt Dob setting circles, Accessories: TV Paracorr 2, Baader MPCC Mk III, ES FF, SSAG, Plossls, Barlows, Telrad, Laser collimators (Seben LK1, Z12, Howie Glatter), Cheshire, 2 Orion RACIs 8x50, Software: KStars-Ekos, DSS, PHD2, Nebulosity, Photo Gallery, Gimp, CHDK

- SkyHiker
- Orion Spur Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 8:40 pm
- 1
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
-
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: Geometrical optics and focuser
Re-reading it, what I meant to say is that a parallel light bundle (for instance from a star at infinity) must be processed by the optics into a parallel light bundle emerging from the eyepiece, for most comfortable viewing by the human eye. Of course the rays coming from different stars are not parallel but the rays contained in the light bundle of each individual star, are.SkyHiker wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:31 amYes.turboscrew wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:56 am But I guess, it has to do with the eye: whether or not the image forms on the retina, in front of it, or behind it?No because the shape of the human eye leads to a nearly fixed focus lens. For comfortable viewing the rays must come in parallel. They may diverge a bit but then the eye's lens must work to focus. So just assume parallel. Then there's not that much to study really.turboscrew wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:56 am To get it, I should study 3 lens systems with true final images?
... Henk.
Telescopes: 6" Mak-Newt (Comet Hunter), ES ED127CF, ES ED80, Zhumell Z12, AT6RC, Venture RX-7, Celestron Skymaster 20x80, Mounts and tripod: Losmandy G11S with DIY OnStep, AVX, LXD55, Tiltall, Cameras: Fuji X-a1, Canon SX40, Xt, XSi, T6, ELPH 100HS, DIY: OnStep controller, Barndoor trackers for 10" Dob and camera, Afocal adapter, Foldable Dob base, Az/Alt Dob setting circles, Accessories: TV Paracorr 2, Baader MPCC Mk III, ES FF, SSAG, Plossls, Barlows, Telrad, Laser collimators (Seben LK1, Z12, Howie Glatter), Cheshire, 2 Orion RACIs 8x50, Software: KStars-Ekos, DSS, PHD2, Nebulosity, Photo Gallery, Gimp, CHDK

- ARock
- Saturn Ambassador
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 4:06 am
- 1
- Location: USA
Re: Geometrical optics and focuser
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3-png.184389/
In the above image, the role of the focuser is to place the
AR
Scopes: Zhumell Z8, Meade Adventure 80mm, Bushnell 1300x100 Goto Mak.
Mount: ES EXOS Nano EQ Mount, DIY Arduino+Stepper drives.
AP: 50mm guidescope, AR0130 based guidecam, Canon T3i, UHC filter.
EPs: ES82 18,11,6.7mm, Zhumell 30,9mm FJ Ortho 9mm, assorted plossls, Meade 2x S-F Barlow, DGM NPB filter.
Binos: Celestron Skymaster 15x70 (Albott tripod/monopod), Nikon Naturalist 7x35.
Scopes: Zhumell Z8, Meade Adventure 80mm, Bushnell 1300x100 Goto Mak.
Mount: ES EXOS Nano EQ Mount, DIY Arduino+Stepper drives.
AP: 50mm guidescope, AR0130 based guidecam, Canon T3i, UHC filter.
EPs: ES82 18,11,6.7mm, Zhumell 30,9mm FJ Ortho 9mm, assorted plossls, Meade 2x S-F Barlow, DGM NPB filter.
Binos: Celestron Skymaster 15x70 (Albott tripod/monopod), Nikon Naturalist 7x35.